User talk:Steven Tuyishime - Revision history

Tom Gluick: /* The Finale */

2008-12-21T02:45:51Z

The Finale

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 21 December 2008
Line 64:		Line 64:
	Hi<br/>		Hi<br/>

-	A great job-- It is almost ready for prime time. With a few edits you ought to enter the contest. The second link to CATH does not work.	+	A great job-- It is almost ready for prime time. With a few edits you ought to enter the contest. The second link to CATH does not work. Also number the termini in the domains. The explanation is good. You ought to zoom in and may be use different set of colors for showing the sandwich. <br/>
		+
		+	Grade: 10/10
		+
		+	Dr. Gluick [[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 04:45, 21 December 2008 (IST)

Tom Gluick: The Finale

2008-12-21T02:29:18Z

The Finale

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:29, 21 December 2008
Line 59:		Line 59:

	Dr Gluick [[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 23:49, 19 December 2008 (IST)		Dr Gluick [[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 23:49, 19 December 2008 (IST)
		+
		+	== The Finale ==
		+
		+	Hi<br/>
		+
		+	A great job-- It is almost ready for prime time. With a few edits you ought to enter the contest. The second link to CATH does not work.

Tom Gluick: /* How to make it better! */

2008-12-19T21:52:56Z

How to make it better!

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 19 December 2008
Line 44:		Line 44:

	Your email: <br/>>		Your email: <br/>>
-	Hey Dr. Gluick I changed the wording and also took out the last wiki. I	+	Hey Dr. Gluick I changed the wording and also took out the last wiki. I
-	just had a question on what you meant by the statement : "The figures do	+	just had a question on what you meant by the statement : "The figures do not help to show your points effectively." I have been thinking about how to manipulate the wikis to better represent the text but all I have been able to come up with is what I have on the page. I was just wondering what kind of wiki would show my points better. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.<br/>
-	not help to show your points effectively." I have been thinking about how to manipulate the wikis to better represent the text but all I have been able to come up with is what I have on the page. I was just wondering	+
-	what kind of wiki would show my points better. Any help would be greatly	+	My Reply: <br/>
-	appreciated. Thank you.<br/>	+
-	My Reply: <br/>	+

	1. label the residues that start and end the domain		1. label the residues that start and end the domain
	2. Since time is short this is what I would do:		2. Since time is short this is what I would do:
	:a. First WIKI shows all subunits with 11 transaparent and one with the two domains--colored differently		:a. First WIKI shows all subunits with 11 transaparent and one with the two domains--colored differently
-	:b. Second WIKI focuses on one of the domains specifically, this WIKI would have the subunit in the center of the field, spinning and as large as possible with the N and C termini of the domain clearly labeled.	+	:b. Second WIKI focuses on one of the domains specifically, this WIKI would have the subunit in the center of the field, spinning and as large as possible with the N and C termini of the domain clearly labeled. Also show the features that make the sandwhich a sandwhich with effective color scheme and bring this out in your text or send the reader to CATH site for this domain directly.
	:c. Another WIKI shows the features of the domain with some indication of what the label means --more here after review--		:c. Another WIKI shows the features of the domain with some indication of what the label means --more here after review--
	:d. I would repeat this for the other domain.		:d. I would repeat this for the other domain.

Tom Gluick: How to make it better!

2008-12-19T21:49:30Z

How to make it better!

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 19 December 2008
Line 40:		Line 40:
	Each of these is a way to classify molecules.--this sentence needs work--is not CATH a hierarchical system used to classify molecules?		Each of these is a way to classify molecules.--this sentence needs work--is not CATH a hierarchical system used to classify molecules?
	The figures do not help to show your points effectively. the last wiki is not really necesssary? [[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 18:58, 19 December 2008 (IST)		The figures do not help to show your points effectively. the last wiki is not really necesssary? [[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 18:58, 19 December 2008 (IST)
		+
		+	== How to make it better! ==
		+
		+	Your email: <br/>>
		+	Hey Dr. Gluick I changed the wording and also took out the last wiki. I
		+	just had a question on what you meant by the statement : "The figures do
		+	not help to show your points effectively." I have been thinking about how to manipulate the wikis to better represent the text but all I have been able to come up with is what I have on the page. I was just wondering
		+	what kind of wiki would show my points better. Any help would be greatly
		+	appreciated. Thank you.<br/>
		+	My Reply: <br/>
		+
		+	1. label the residues that start and end the domain
		+	2. Since time is short this is what I would do:
		+	:a. First WIKI shows all subunits with 11 transaparent and one with the two domains--colored differently
		+	:b. Second WIKI focuses on one of the domains specifically, this WIKI would have the subunit in the center of the field, spinning and as large as possible with the N and C termini of the domain clearly labeled.
		+	:c. Another WIKI shows the features of the domain with some indication of what the label means --more here after review--
		+	:d. I would repeat this for the other domain.
		+	:e. I would link to CATH directly so the reader can see typical structures or explanation of the fold in the CATH database.
		+	3. Again this is what I would do.
		+
		+	Dr Gluick [[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 23:49, 19 December 2008 (IST)

Tom Gluick: /* more comments */

2008-12-19T16:58:56Z

more comments

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 19 December 2008
Line 36:		Line 36:
	== more comments ==		== more comments ==

-	hi	+	hi<br/>

-	Each of these is a way to classify molecules.--this sentence needs work--is not CATH a hierarchical system used to classify molecules?	+	Each of these is a way to classify molecules.--this sentence needs work--is not CATH a hierarchical system used to classify molecules?
	The figures do not help to show your points effectively. the last wiki is not really necesssary? [[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 18:58, 19 December 2008 (IST)		The figures do not help to show your points effectively. the last wiki is not really necesssary? [[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 18:58, 19 December 2008 (IST)

Tom Gluick: more comments

2008-12-19T16:58:19Z

more comments

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 19 December 2008
Line 33:		Line 33:
	I do not think showing the amino acid residue that connects the two domains is instructive.<br/>		I do not think showing the amino acid residue that connects the two domains is instructive.<br/>
	[[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 08:20, 18 December 2008 (IST)		[[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 08:20, 18 December 2008 (IST)
		+
		+	== more comments ==
		+
		+	hi
		+
		+	Each of these is a way to classify molecules.--this sentence needs work--is not CATH a hierarchical system used to classify molecules?
		+	The figures do not help to show your points effectively. the last wiki is not really necesssary? [[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 18:58, 19 December 2008 (IST)

Tom Gluick: Comments on Revision

2008-12-18T06:20:32Z

Comments on Revision

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:20, 18 December 2008
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Grade 8.5/9.0<br/>		Grade 8.5/9.0<br/>
	Dr. Gluick		Dr. Gluick
		+
		+	== Comments on Revision ==
		+
		+	A couple of things:<br/>
		+	Dropping the T and H of CATH is fine. However, you can illustrate topology ( which is just how things are linked) by using N-C coloring scheme; Or you might want to illustrate the fold by a better color scheme than just boring gray.<br/>
		+	Also, if you can center on the final selection, than rotate about the selection instead of the entire molecule.<br/>
		+	I do not think showing the amino acid residue that connects the two domains is instructive.<br/>
		+	[[User:Tom Gluick\|Tom Gluick]] 08:20, 18 December 2008 (IST)

Tom Gluick: /* Outline Assessment */

2008-12-15T19:01:59Z

Outline Assessment

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 15 December 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:


-	The outline is in pretty good shape. You provide a nice discussion of the term used in CATH which I thought to be appropriate for the assignment. The WIKIS subject matter also match the text. Overall, the text is well written. In your final submission, remove the links from the first assignment, and label your references--see Proteopedia help on references or view my page. Looking forward to seeing the finished product.	+	The outline is in pretty good shape. You provide a nice discussion of the term used in CATH which I thought to be appropriate for the assignment. The WIKIS subject matter also match the text. Overall, the text is well written. In your final submission, remove the links from the first assignment, and label your references--see Proteopedia help on references or view my page. Looking forward to seeing the finished product.<br/>

		+	Grade 8.5/9.0<br/>
	Dr. Gluick		Dr. Gluick

Steven Tuyishime: /* Outline */

2008-12-12T18:15:07Z

Outline

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 12 December 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	== Outline Assessment ==		== Outline Assessment ==

-	==Outline==

	The outline is in pretty good shape. You provide a nice discussion of the term used in CATH which I thought to be appropriate for the assignment. The WIKIS subject matter also match the text. Overall, the text is well written. In your final submission, remove the links from the first assignment, and label your references--see Proteopedia help on references or view my page. Looking forward to seeing the finished product.		The outline is in pretty good shape. You provide a nice discussion of the term used in CATH which I thought to be appropriate for the assignment. The WIKIS subject matter also match the text. Overall, the text is well written. In your final submission, remove the links from the first assignment, and label your references--see Proteopedia help on references or view my page. Looking forward to seeing the finished product.

	Dr. Gluick		Dr. Gluick

Steven Tuyishime: Outline Assessment

2008-12-12T18:14:35Z

Outline Assessment

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 12 December 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Best,		Best,
	[[User:Eran Hodis\|Eran Hodis]] 18:28, 17 November 2008 (IST)		[[User:Eran Hodis\|Eran Hodis]] 18:28, 17 November 2008 (IST)
		+
		+	== Outline Assessment ==
		+
		+	==Outline==
		+
		+	The outline is in pretty good shape. You provide a nice discussion of the term used in CATH which I thought to be appropriate for the assignment. The WIKIS subject matter also match the text. Overall, the text is well written. In your final submission, remove the links from the first assignment, and label your references--see Proteopedia help on references or view my page. Looking forward to seeing the finished product.
		+
		+	Dr. Gluick