Retractions and Fraud
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* 2012, February: [[3k78]] was removed from the [[PDB]] because it appears to be fraudlent<ref>PMID: 22552066</ref><ref>[http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/protein-structure-retracted-after-investigation-into-highly-improbable-features-journal-calls-it-fraud/ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud], April 2012</ref>. | * 2012, February: [[3k78]] was removed from the [[PDB]] because it appears to be fraudlent<ref>PMID: 22552066</ref><ref>[http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/protein-structure-retracted-after-investigation-into-highly-improbable-features-journal-calls-it-fraud/ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud], April 2012</ref>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 2009 and subsequently, several entries authored by H.M. Krishna Murthy were removed from the [[PDB]] as they appear to be fraudulent. These include | ||
+ | See the statement by the Worldwide PDB<ref>[http://www.wwpdb.org/UAB.html wwPDB Statement on Retraction of PDB Entries].</ref> | ||
+ | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references /> | <references /> |
Revision as of 02:02, 12 May 2012
A number of PDB entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes.
- 2009 and subsequently, several entries authored by H.M. Krishna Murthy were removed from the PDB as they appear to be fraudulent. These include
See the statement by the Worldwide PDB[3]
References
- ↑ Abbott A. Trial tests Austrian integrity body. Nature. 2012 May 1;485(7396):15. doi: 10.1038/485015a. PMID:22552066 doi:10.1038/485015a
- ↑ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud, April 2012
- ↑ wwPDB Statement on Retraction of PDB Entries.