Sandbox Wabash 02 Fumarase

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
The discovery that fumarase harbored two adjacent anion binding sites led to the dilemma as to which site was the active site (Weaver & Banaszak, 1996). The H129N and H188N mutants were generated to resolve the two site problem. The fact that fumarase is only active as a tetramer provided strong initial support for the A-site being the active site because it has components from three subunits (Weaver et al., 1995). It was suspected that the A-site was the active site because of the observation that no active monomeric form of fumarase has ever been described, and the A-site was formed by residues from three of the four subunits. Because the biochemical data suggested that a histidine side chain was one of the bases participating in the catalytic reaction (Brant et al.. 1963), testing whether H129 or H188 affected catalytic activity appeared to offer a way of resolving the two site dilemma. Evidence as to which of the two ligand binding sites was indeed the catalytic site should be obtainable by mutating the histidines at the two different sites. If the A-site was the active site, changing H188 should dramatically affect the catalytic activity. Conversely, if the B-site was the active site then a mutation at H129 should affect catalysis.
The discovery that fumarase harbored two adjacent anion binding sites led to the dilemma as to which site was the active site (Weaver & Banaszak, 1996). The H129N and H188N mutants were generated to resolve the two site problem. The fact that fumarase is only active as a tetramer provided strong initial support for the A-site being the active site because it has components from three subunits (Weaver et al., 1995). It was suspected that the A-site was the active site because of the observation that no active monomeric form of fumarase has ever been described, and the A-site was formed by residues from three of the four subunits. Because the biochemical data suggested that a histidine side chain was one of the bases participating in the catalytic reaction (Brant et al.. 1963), testing whether H129 or H188 affected catalytic activity appeared to offer a way of resolving the two site dilemma. Evidence as to which of the two ligand binding sites was indeed the catalytic site should be obtainable by mutating the histidines at the two different sites. If the A-site was the active site, changing H188 should dramatically affect the catalytic activity. Conversely, if the B-site was the active site then a mutation at H129 should affect catalysis.
-
As evident from the calculated specific activities for wild-type fumarase and the H129N and the H188N mutants, little effect is observed in changing H129 into an asparagine residue as both wild type and H129N have about the same specific activity. However, the H188N mutation dramatically affects the catalytic reaction. The specific activity of the H188N is approximately 200 times less than that of wild-type enzyme or H129N. These results prove that the active site of fumarase is near H188 or the A-site. The significance of the B-site to the catalytic reaction is unknown.
+
As evident from the calculated specific activities for wild-type fumarase and the H129N and the H188N mutants, little effect is observed in changing H129 into an asparagine residue as both wild type and H129N have about the same specific activity. However, the H188N mutation dramatically affects the catalytic reaction. The specific activity of the H188N is approximately 200 times less than that of wild-type enzyme or H129N. These results prove that the active site of fumarase is near H188 or the A-site. The significance of the B-site to the catalytic reaction is unknown. X-ray crystal structures were determined to see what effects the mutations had on local conformation at both the A- and B-sites.

Revision as of 02:00, 28 February 2016

Wabash Sandbox 02 Fumarase

Caption for this structure

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

References

  1. Hanson, R. M., Prilusky, J., Renjian, Z., Nakane, T. and Sussman, J. L. (2013), JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia. Isr. J. Chem., 53:207-216. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300024
  2. Herraez A. Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006 Jul;34(4):255-61. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644. PMID:21638687 doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644
Personal tools