Journal:Acta Cryst D:S2059798320011869
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*<scene name='86/860390/Cv/5'>Pentamer of tetramer stacking in the toad NA crystal. Top view</scene>. | *<scene name='86/860390/Cv/5'>Pentamer of tetramer stacking in the toad NA crystal. Top view</scene>. | ||
*<scene name='86/860390/Cv/6'>One of the tetramers</scene>. | *<scene name='86/860390/Cv/6'>One of the tetramers</scene>. | ||
| - | In the lattice-translocation defect crystals, every other layer is either in the Fig. 5b orientation or in the Fig. 5d orientation, and the choice is absolutely random. This randomness breaks the long-term periodic and forms a local short-term periodic. This appears to be the particle-size broadening (Coppens, 1997)<ref name="Coppens">PMID:25727874</ref>. If the long-term periodic is broken, the diffraction intensity would spread along the reciprocal-space direction of the step function. In this special case, it is the b* direction. With the spread of the reflections, the subsidiary maxima of the neighboring reflections may overlap, which will result in the smear spots, the especial chacteracters of LTD. | + | In the lattice-translocation defect crystals, every other layer is either in the Fig. 5b orientation or in the <scene name='86/860390/Cv/7'>Fig. 5d orientation</scene>, and the choice is absolutely random. This randomness breaks the long-term periodic and forms a local short-term periodic. This appears to be the particle-size broadening (Coppens, 1997)<ref name="Coppens">PMID:25727874</ref>. If the long-term periodic is broken, the diffraction intensity would spread along the reciprocal-space direction of the step function. In this special case, it is the b* direction. With the spread of the reflections, the subsidiary maxima of the neighboring reflections may overlap, which will result in the smear spots, the especial chacteracters of LTD. |
In the intensity deconvolution methods, the randomly distributed two different kinds of layers (third in Fig. 6a) were supposed to accumulate into two mosaic domains (fourth in Fig. 6a), which is similar to twining (Dauter & Jaskolski, 2016)<ref name="Dauter">PMID:28132496</ref>. The corrected intensities could be obtained by dividing the observed value by the factor of [(2''k''<sup>2</sup>-2k+1)+2k(1-k)cos(2πh''t''<sub>d</sub>)]. Therefore, LTD problem could be solved. | In the intensity deconvolution methods, the randomly distributed two different kinds of layers (third in Fig. 6a) were supposed to accumulate into two mosaic domains (fourth in Fig. 6a), which is similar to twining (Dauter & Jaskolski, 2016)<ref name="Dauter">PMID:28132496</ref>. The corrected intensities could be obtained by dividing the observed value by the factor of [(2''k''<sup>2</sup>-2k+1)+2k(1-k)cos(2πh''t''<sub>d</sub>)]. Therefore, LTD problem could be solved. | ||
Revision as of 11:54, 15 September 2020
| |||||||||||
This page complements a publication in scientific journals and is one of the Proteopedia's Interactive 3D Complement pages. For aditional details please see I3DC.
