New Test

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
-
<StructureSection load='7jzl' size='350' frame='true' side='right' caption='SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Bound to Minibinders (PDB 7jzl)' scene='10/1075220/Monomerwithminibinder/4'>
+
<StructureSection load='7jzl' size='350' frame='true' side='right' caption='SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein (7JZL): A trimer responsible for interacting with host ACE2 receptors to deliver the virus into host cells.' scene='10/1078099/Spike_protein/1'>
==Introduction==
==Introduction==

Revision as of 01:09, 14 April 2025

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein (7JZL): A trimer responsible for interacting with host ACE2 receptors to deliver the virus into host cells.

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate


Contents

Binding Site and Interactions

In order to best target the RBD of the spike protein, the minibinders reveal a wide range of interactions to compete with .

The first design method, Rosetta, created AHB2 based on the single interacting helix of ACE2. With , we see two alpha helices mimicking ACE2. Hydrogen bonding interactions between N36, D11, K43, E41, and E30 of the minibinder interact with residues K417, R403, Y449, Q493, and N487, respectively, in the spike protein.

De novo designed proteins, as discussed previously, focused on computational design to determine residues best able to interact with the spike protein. We will focus on LCB1 and LCB3. reveals hydrogen bonding between D30 of the minibinder and both K417 and R403 of the spike protein, in addition to D17 and R14 of the minibinder interacting with Q493 of the spike protein. Similarly, reveals hydrogen bonding between D11 of the minibinder to K417 and R403 of the spike protein.

Within all four binding sites, we see two conserved residues throughout: K417 and Q493. This finding reveals the importance of these residues in both binding and stability.

Furthermore, an interesting difference between the two design methods is the location of hydrogen bonding interactions. In AHB2, similar to ACE2, we see interactions spanning the entirety of the helices in contact with the spike protein. De novo design, on the other hand, reveals the main hydrogen bonding interactions occurring within the center residues of the helices.

Figure 4 shows the sequence comparison between the interacting helix of ACE2 and the helices of the three minibinders.
Figure 4: The sequence differences between ACE2, AHB2, LCB1 and LCB3.
Figure 4: The sequence differences between ACE2, AHB2, LCB1 and LCB3.

Protein Inhibitor Effectiveness

Limitations

References

Cao, L., Goreshnik, I., Coventry, B., Case, J.B., Miller, L., Kozodoy, L., Chen, R.E., Carter, L., Walls, A.C., Park, Y., Strauch, E., Stewart, L., Diamond, M.S., Veesler, D., & Baker, D. De novo design of picomolar SARS-CoV-2 mini protein inhibitors. Science 370, 426-431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd9909

https://www.who.int/europe/emergencies/situations/covid-19

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9786537/#:~:text=The%20receptor%2Dbinding%20domain%20(RBD,that%20initiates%20the%20viral%20transmission.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41580-021-00418-x#citeas

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abd9909

Zhang, Haoran et al. Advances in developing ACE2 derivatives against SARS-CoV-2. The Lancet Microbe, Volume 4, Issue 5, e369 - e378 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00011-3

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/basics/explaining-how-vaccines-work.html\

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine


PDB Files

[1]https://www.rcsb.org/structure/7UHB

Student Contributors

  • Giavanna Yowell
  • Shea Bailey
  • Matthew Pereira

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Matthew Pereira

Personal tools