3gvb
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
(5 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | [[Image:3gvb.png|left|200px]] | ||
- | + | ==AmpC beta-lactamase in complex with Fragment-based Inhibitor== | |
+ | <StructureSection load='3gvb' size='340' side='right'caption='[[3gvb]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 1.80Å' scene=''> | ||
+ | == Structural highlights == | ||
+ | <table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[3gvb]] is a 2 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escherichia_coli_K-12 Escherichia coli K-12]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=3GVB OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=3GVB FirstGlance]. <br> | ||
+ | </td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">X-ray diffraction, [[Resolution|Resolution]] 1.8Å</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=3GV:(3S)-1-(2-HYDROXYPHENYL)-5-OXOPYRROLIDINE-3-CARBOXYLIC+ACID'>3GV</scene>, <scene name='pdbligand=DMS:DIMETHYL+SULFOXIDE'>DMS</scene>, <scene name='pdbligand=PO4:PHOSPHATE+ION'>PO4</scene></td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=3gvb FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=3gvb OCA], [https://pdbe.org/3gvb PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3gvb RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/3gvb PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=3gvb ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | == Function == | ||
+ | [https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/AMPC_ECOLI AMPC_ECOLI] This protein is a serine beta-lactamase with a substrate specificity for cephalosporins. | ||
+ | == Evolutionary Conservation == | ||
+ | [[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]] | ||
+ | Check<jmol> | ||
+ | <jmolCheckbox> | ||
+ | <scriptWhenChecked>; select protein; define ~consurf_to_do selected; consurf_initial_scene = true; script "/wiki/ConSurf/gv/3gvb_consurf.spt"</scriptWhenChecked> | ||
+ | <scriptWhenUnchecked>script /wiki/extensions/Proteopedia/spt/initialview01.spt</scriptWhenUnchecked> | ||
+ | <text>to colour the structure by Evolutionary Conservation</text> | ||
+ | </jmolCheckbox> | ||
+ | </jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=3gvb ConSurf]. | ||
+ | <div style="clear:both"></div> | ||
+ | <div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | ||
+ | == Publication Abstract from PubMed == | ||
+ | Fragment screens for new ligands have had wide success, notwithstanding their constraint to libraries of 1,000-10,000 molecules. Larger libraries would be addressable were molecular docking reliable for fragment screens, but this has not been widely accepted. To investigate docking's ability to prioritize fragments, a library of >137,000 such molecules were docked against the structure of beta-lactamase. Forty-eight fragments highly ranked by docking were acquired and tested; 23 had K(i) values ranging from 0.7 to 9.2 mM. X-ray crystal structures of the enzyme-bound complexes were determined for 8 of the fragments. For 4, the correspondence between the predicted and experimental structures was high (RMSD between 1.2 and 1.4 A), whereas for another 2, the fidelity was lower but retained most key interactions (RMSD 2.4-2.6 A). Two of the 8 fragments adopted very different poses in the active site owing to enzyme conformational changes. The 48% hit rate of the fragment docking compares very favorably with "lead-like" docking and high-throughput screening against the same enzyme. To understand this, we investigated the occurrence of the fragment scaffolds among larger, lead-like molecules. Approximately 1% of commercially available fragments contain these inhibitors whereas only 10(-7)% of lead-like molecules do. This suggests that many more chemotypes and combinations of chemotypes are present among fragments than are available among lead-like molecules, contributing to the higher hit rates. The ability of docking to prioritize these fragments suggests that the technique can be used to exploit the better chemotype coverage that exists at the fragment level. | ||
- | + | Docking for fragment inhibitors of AmpC beta-lactamase.,Teotico DG, Babaoglu K, Rocklin GJ, Ferreira RS, Giannetti AM, Shoichet BK Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 5;106(18):7455-60. Epub 2009 Apr 22. PMID:19416920<ref>PMID:19416920</ref> | |
- | + | From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | |
- | + | </div> | |
- | + | <div class="pdbe-citations 3gvb" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div> | |
- | + | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
- | *[[Beta-lactamase|Beta-lactamase]] | + | *[[Beta-lactamase 3D structures|Beta-lactamase 3D structures]] |
- | + | == References == | |
- | == | + | <references/> |
- | < | + | __TOC__ |
- | [[Category: | + | </StructureSection> |
- | [[Category: | + | [[Category: Escherichia coli K-12]] |
- | [[Category: Shoichet | + | [[Category: Large Structures]] |
- | [[Category: Teotico | + | [[Category: Shoichet BK]] |
- | + | [[Category: Teotico DT]] | |
- | + | ||
- | + |
Current revision
AmpC beta-lactamase in complex with Fragment-based Inhibitor
|