This old version of Proteopedia is provided for student assignments while the new version is undergoing repairs. Content and edits done in this old version of Proteopedia after March 1, 2026 will eventually be lost when it is retired in about June of 2026.

Apply for new accounts at the new Proteopedia. Your logins will work in both the old and new versions.

Fragment-Based Drug Discovery

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)

Jump to: navigation, search

Current revision

Drug Design: Fragment-Based Drug Discovery

Traditionally, new drugs are developed by either making small changes to existing drugs or by individually testing thousands of compounds. Both of these methods require many hours of laborious chemical synthesis. However, new techniques are being applied in the drug industry which show promise in decreasing the cost and time required to discover and develop new drugs.

1 Fragment-Based Drug Discovery

Fragment-Based Drug Discovery

One technique used in drug discovery is fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD). FBDD is a method of discovering new compounds by utilizing fragments that have some degree of binding affinity for a drug target, optimizing those fragments so as to increase their binding affinity, then linking them together to form a lead compound that has high affinity and selectivity for the drug target. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and x-ray crystallography can be used to analyze the fragments and drug targets in order to create three-dimensional images which can be used to obtain an analysis of molecular relationships. This allows developers to get a visual representation of how each fragment binds to the target and can also be useful in identifying the individual binding sites of the target.

Fragment-Based Drug Discovery (Adapted from Fig. 1)^[1]

The development of using SAR by NMR is a classic example of FBDD. (Throughout this discussion ABT-737 will be used to illustrate the FBDD process.) This compound has been shown to effectively inhibit the over-expression of which is a protein that is commonly observed to be over-expressed in many types of cancers.^[2] It acts an inhibitor of apoptosis and may also contribute to chemotherapy resistance. Bcl-xl inhibition by ABT-737 therefore, allows apoptosis to occur and helps to prevent chemo-resistance.

SAR by NMR
Structure-activity relationship (SAR) by NMR is one tool that can be used to design and develop new drugs. This is the process in which NMR is used to identify the components responsible for binding to the protein. NMR is also used to analyze the relationships between these components to determine where the protein binding sites are located and how the ligand interacts with those sites.^[1]

Ligand Screening

The first step of FBDD is to expose the potential drug target to a large number of small molecular fragments. This is usually done with a method known as high-throughput screening. High-throughput screening (HTS) is the process of using robotics to perform a large number of chemical tests. HTS is used to quickly identify fragments that have affinity for the target which are then analyzed to understand why they have affinity.

ABT-737: ligand screening

were found to have moderate affinity for Bcl-xl. is a fluorobiphenylcarboxylic acid. It occupies of Bcl-xl which consists of Phe 101, Tyr 105, Ala 108, Phe 109, Leu 136, Gly 142, Arg 143, and Ala 146. The fluorobiphenyl system of compound 1 is very hydrophobic and therefore, these residues form a around the system. There is also one hydrophilic interaction involved in this complex. The of Bcl-xl. This is not a strong interaction but is significant because it can be modified to form a much stronger bond.

is a napthalene-based alcohol which occupies . This particular fragment also is involved with hydrophobic interactions with Bcl-xl, although they are not as strong as in the case of compound 1. This binding site includes Ala 97, Glu 100, Phe 101, Val 145, and Tyr 199.

Ligand Optimization

Once the fragments have been identified, they are then modified to increase their binding affinity. These modifications can include atom substitutions, the addition of substituents, or even the replacement of the entire fragment. Knowing and having an understanding of the structure of the biological target is useful in optimizing the fragments. The nature of the binding site is what determines how a ligand will bind (as in the case of the hydrophobic pocket formed around compound 1). This approach to designing drugs is referred to as structure-based drug design.

Structure-Based Drug Design
Structure-based drug design is utilized when the 3-D structure of a protein, or other drug target, is used to predict drug candidates. A visual representation of the structure allows developers to pinpoint binding sites and more effectively design a drug that will have high affinity for the target.

ABT-737: ligand optimization

Compounds 1 & 2 exhibited very poor binding affinity for Bcl-xl. The optimization of these two compounds resulted in . In order to improve the binding affinity, the carboxylic acid of compound 1 was substituted with an acyl sulfonamide to capitalize on the hydrophilic interaction with the protein. This thereby increasing the affinity for Bcl-xl. The substitution of the sulfonamide actually allows the acidic proton to get closer to Gly 142 than it could in the carboxylic acid, which is why it is able to bind stronger to the amino acid.

Compound 2 was important in identifying the hydrophobicity of binding site 2 but affinity was increased by substituting a . This substitution more efficiently binds to site 2 through . This idea of using a known ligand to develop another ligand, and eventually drugs, is known as ligand-based drug design.

Ligand-Based Drug Design
"Ligand-based drug design (LBDD) techniques are applied when the structure of the receptor is unknown but when a series of compounds or ligands have been identified that show the biological activity of the interest."^[3] In other words, once it is known how a ligand binds to a protein or any other molecule, new ligands, and eventually drugs, can be designed to bind in a similar manner and get the desired effect. It involves modifying a known ligand to develop another ligand with a higher binding affinity for the target.

One challenge in drug delivery is bioavailability. The bioavailibility may be decreased due to non-specific protein binding. Therefore, compound 3 required further optimization because Bcl-xl affinity is greatly reduced in the presence of human serum albumin (HSA). In order to decrease HSA affinity, and therefore increase Bcl-xl affinity, SAR by NMR was used to modify compound 3 by eliminating key binding groups of the compound to HSA without affecting Bcl-xl affinity.

Modifying compound 3 to reduce HSA affinity
Compound 3 has high affinity for Bcl-xl but has an even higher affinity for HSA. For this reason, when HSA is present, compound 3 and similar ligands are more likely to bind to HSA thereby decreasing the amount that can bind with Bcl-xl. In order to decrease the affinity for HSA while maintaining affinity for Bcl-xl, SAR by NMR was used to compare compound 3 with a (thioethylamino-2,4-dimethylphenyl analogue), which also has high affinity for HSA. It was found that of compound 4 had very strong hydrophobic interactions with HSA. Therefore, these portions in compound 3 were modified with polar substituents to decrease HSA affinity. To decrease hydrophobicity, the fluorobiphenyl system was substituted with a and a was added to the thioethylamino linkage group.

Ligand Linking

The final step in FBDD is to link all of the individual, optimized fragments together to form one compound with very high affinity for the target. The goal is for all of the high-binding affinity characteristics of the fragments to be represented in one final, high-affinity compound.

References

↑ ^1.0 ^1.1 Shuker S. B., Hajduk P. J., Meadows R. P., Fesik S. W. Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR. Science; Nov 29, 1996; 274, 5292; ProQuest Central pg. 1531.
↑ Oltersdorf T., Elmore S. W., Shoemaker A. R. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Vol 435|2 June 2005|doi:10.1038/nature03579
↑ Pandit D. LIGAND-BASED DRUG DESIGN: I. CONFORMATIONAL STUDIES OF GBR 12909 ANALOGS AS COCAINE ANTAGONISTS; II. 3D-QSAR STUDIES OF SALVINORIN A ANALOGS AS εΑΡΡΑ OPIOID AGONISTS. http://archives.njit.edu/vol01/etd/2000s/2007/njit-etd2007-051/njit-etd2007-051.pdf

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Justin Weekley, Arthur Cox, Jaime Prilusky

Retrieved from "http://52.214.119.220/wiki/index.php/Fragment-Based_Drug_Discovery"

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
-The development of <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Abt-737/5'>ABT-737</scene> using SAR by NMR is a classic example of FBDD. (Throughout this discussion ABT-737 will be used to illustrate the FBDD process.) This compound has been shown to effectively inhibit the over-expression of <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Bcl-xl/1'>Bcl-xl</scene> which is a protein that is commonly observed to be over-expressed in many types of cancers.<ref name="Oltersdorf T., Elmore S. W., Shoemaker A. R. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Vol 435|2 June 2005|doi:10.1038/nature03579">Oltersdorf T., Elmore S. W., Shoemaker A. R. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Vol 435|2 June 2005|doi:10.1038/nature03579</ref> It acts an inhibitor of apoptosis and may also contribute to chemotherapy resistance. Bcl-xl inhibition by ABT-737 therefore, allows apoptosis to occur and helps to prevent chemo-resistance.
+The development of <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Abt-737/6'>ABT-737</scene> using SAR by NMR is a classic example of FBDD. (Throughout this discussion ABT-737 will be used to illustrate the FBDD process.) This compound has been shown to effectively inhibit the over-expression of <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Bcl-xl/1'>Bcl-xl</scene> which is a protein that is commonly observed to be over-expressed in many types of cancers.<ref name="Oltersdorf T., Elmore S. W., Shoemaker A. R. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Vol 435|2 June 2005|doi:10.1038/nature03579">Oltersdorf T., Elmore S. W., Shoemaker A. R. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Vol 435|2 June 2005|doi:10.1038/nature03579</ref> It acts an inhibitor of apoptosis and may also contribute to chemotherapy resistance. Bcl-xl inhibition by ABT-737 therefore, allows apoptosis to occur and helps to prevent chemo-resistance.
 {| class="wikitable collapsible"
 ! scope="col" width="5000px" | SAR by NMR
@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 ! scope="col" width="5000px" | Modifying compound 3 to reduce HSA affinity
 |-
-| scope="col" width="5000px" | Compound 3 has high affinity for Bcl-xl but has an even higher affinity for HSA. For this reason, when HSA is present, compound 3 and similar ligands are more likely to bind to HSA thereby decreasing the amount that can bind with Bcl-xl. In order to decrease the affinity for HSA while maintaining affinity for Bcl-xl, SAR by NMR was used to compare compound 3 with a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_3/1'>compound 4</scene> (thioethylamino-2,4-dimethylphenyl analogue), which also has high affinity for HSA. It was found that <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_3/2'>two hydrophobic portions</scene> of compound 3 had very strong hydrophobic interactions with HSA. Therefore, these portions were modified with polar substituents to decrease HSA affinity. To decrease hydrophobicity, the fluorobiphenyl system was substituted with a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Piperazine_ring/2'>piperazine ring</scene> and a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Abt-737/4'>2-dimethylaminoethyl group</scene> was added to the thioethylamino linkage group.
+| scope="col" width="5000px" | Compound 3 has high affinity for Bcl-xl but has an even higher affinity for HSA. For this reason, when HSA is present, compound 3 and similar ligands are more likely to bind to HSA thereby decreasing the amount that can bind with Bcl-xl. In order to decrease the affinity for HSA while maintaining affinity for Bcl-xl, SAR by NMR was used to compare compound 3 with a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_3/1'>compound 4</scene> (thioethylamino-2,4-dimethylphenyl analogue), which also has high affinity for HSA. It was found that <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_3/3'>two hydrophobic portions</scene> of compound 4 had very strong hydrophobic interactions with HSA. Therefore, these portions in compound 3 were modified with polar substituents to decrease HSA affinity. To decrease hydrophobicity, the fluorobiphenyl system was substituted with a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Piperazine_ring/2'>piperazine ring</scene> and a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Abt-737/4'>2-dimethylaminoethyl group</scene> was added to the thioethylamino linkage group.
 |}

Fragment-Based Drug Discovery

From Proteopedia

Current revision

Drug Design: Fragment-Based Drug Discovery

Contents

Fragment-Based Drug Discovery

Ligand Screening

ABT-737: ligand screening

Ligand Optimization

ABT-737: ligand optimization

Ligand Linking

References

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Views

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Toolbox