Sandbox Reserved 969

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (21:29, 9 January 2015) (edit) (undo)
 
Line 75: Line 75:
Moreover we may underscore a higher affinity for K+ than Na+ because of several reason :
Moreover we may underscore a higher affinity for K+ than Na+ because of several reason :
-
First, we can find 4 backbone carbonyl oxygen from <scene name='60/604488/Val64/1'>Val64</scene> which participate in K+ and Rb+ ions chelation because of the formation of an octahedral ligand: an octahedral arrangement oxygen ligands in the channel pore is more favorable for K+ than Na+.
+
First, we can find 4 backbones carbonyl oxygen from <scene name='60/604488/Val64/1'>Val64</scene> which participate in K+ and Rb+ ions chelation because of the formation of an octahedral ligand: an octahedral arrangement oxygen ligands in the channel pore is more favorable for K+ than Na+.
The lack of selectivity is due to the fact that the NaK channel have an almost identical structure when it is in complex with Na+, K+ or Rb+ : there is no big rearrangement in the structure of the protein depending on the bound ion. So the structure is stable with any ions, so it is non selective. Moreover, it could have a heavy atom contamination but it happens in a smaller extent with K+ than with Na+.
The lack of selectivity is due to the fact that the NaK channel have an almost identical structure when it is in complex with Na+, K+ or Rb+ : there is no big rearrangement in the structure of the protein depending on the bound ion. So the structure is stable with any ions, so it is non selective. Moreover, it could have a heavy atom contamination but it happens in a smaller extent with K+ than with Na+.

Current revision

NaK Channel 3E83

PDB ID 3e83

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate
Personal tools