Sandbox Reserved 429
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
(→Additional Features) |
|||
(196 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- INSERT YOUR SCENES AND TEXT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- INSERT YOUR SCENES AND TEXT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
- | =='' | + | ==''Penicillin binding protein/lactivicin (inhibitor) (2jch)<ref>PMID: 17676039 </ref>''== |
+ | by Tyler Carpenter, Samuel Pierce, Hyunjoon Choi, Anton El Khoury and Tiankai Zhang | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Student Projects for UMass Chemistry 423 Spring 2016]] | ||
+ | <StructureSection load='2jch' size='350' side='right' caption='Key player in cell rescue from the imminent death (2jch)' scene='48/483886/Rainbow/1'> | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
- | < | + | Every bacteria wants to live. Every bacteria wants to reproduce. To achieve both, bacteria need some sort of protection that will maintain the structure inside and will protect it from outside dangers. This protection is called cell wall, that primarily consists of a polymer that is called peptidoglycan. This compound can be synthesized only with the help of <font color='red'> ''penicillin binding proteins (PBPs)'' </font> , which are the target of this article (the name basically comes from a way it was discovered). PBP serves as a catalyst in the final stages of peptidoglycan synthesis, transglycosylation and transpeptidation in particular.<ref>PMID: 23949602</ref> Although there are multiple types of PBPs, they all bind penicillin (however, with different affinities) and this is what is important for this article. |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
+ | As the bacteria infiltrates the organism, it becomes necessary to somehow destroy it. One way is to to break this cell wall. To achieve this, the penicillin is introduced to the bacteria that later reacts with PBPs (using <font color='orange'> ''β-lactam ring'' </font>), preventing it from catalyzing the formation of a peptidoglycan and, as a result, stops the formation of a cell wall. However, many pathogenic bacteria have evolved a way to mutate themselves to be immune to various drugs that contain this β-lactam rings. What happens is that bacterium produces enzyme, called <scene name='48/483886/Beta_lactamase/1'>β-lactamase</scene> that cleaves the β-lactam ring on a penicillin and thus preventing it from reacting with PBPs. To solve this problem, the new drug, called, lactivicin was developed that contains gamma-lactone rings and cycloserine as substitutions to β-lactam. So far, it has proved to be an efficient antibiotic. It successfully binds to PBPs and prevents cell wall from forming. | ||
+ | Recently, an analog of lactivicin, phenoxylactivicin (PLTV) was developed and is discussed in this article. | ||
+ | The complex of the PBP with <scene name='48/483886/Pltv/3'>phenoxylactivicin</scene> is shown on the picture. | ||
+ | Picture on the right is displayed as N-terminus to C-termiunus Rainbow for<scene name='48/483886/Rainbow/1'> PBP complex </scene>. The coloring goes as shown on the sample: | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | {{Template:ColorKey_Amino2CarboxyRainbow}} | ||
==Overall Structure== | ==Overall Structure== | ||
- | < | + | Penicillin Binding Proteins have specific structures and designs that promote allow the binding of Penicillin and other antibiotics. One of the enzymes within the PBP family is <scene name='48/483886/D-alanyl-d-alanine_carboxypept/1'>D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase/transpeptidase</scene>. This enzyme is responsible for the link between two chains in the peptidoglycan network <ref> Goodsell, David. "Penicillin-binding Proteins." Penicillin-binding Proteins. May 2002. Web. 07 Apr. 2016.</ref>. DA-DA peptidase’s structure contains a serine in the active site. Ser 62 is used to bind a peptide strand which would then link to another strand of the network, and this is the site where penicillin binds and inhibits the protein. |
+ | This enzyme is split into two sections, which will be referred to as the North and South regions. The North Region contains both the carboxyl and amino termini, two α-helices, and a nine-stranded antiparallel β-sheet <ref> Kelly, J. A., and A. P. Kuzin. "3PTE." RCSB PDB. Web. 07 Apr. 2016.</ref> This leads the Northern region of the enzyme to appear symmetrical. Both termini lead are connected to helices and then into β-strands. Inbetween the sets of strands the South region of the peptide is formed and this is strictly made out of helices. In the center of the two regions is where the Ser 62 active site resides, and this is also at the symmetrical center of the protein. The protein essentially forms a cupped hand, with the center of the palm being the active site, the bottom of the palm being a series of 8 or so helices, the knuckles being the β-strands, and the tips of the fingers being the two helices of the North region. | ||
- | The Overall Structure of LRRK2 is shown in the window on the right and may be returned to by clicking <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_secondary_structure/1'>here</scene>. | ||
- | |||
- | The two chains, or units, that make up LRRK2 are essentially each TYK2 proteins, meaning LRRK2 is a dimer of TYK2. The Overall Structure of TYK2 is shown <scene name='48/483886/Tyk2_secondary_structure/1'>here</scene>. The one major structural difference is that LRRK2 includes 2 Mg+ ions while Tyk2 does not. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | *'''Building the LRRK2 Protein''' | ||
- | |||
- | There are 12 <font color='gold'> '''beta sheets''' </font>that form the backbone of the protein. <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_secondary_structure_1/1'>Click</scene> to add them. 6 sheets belong to <font color='palegreen'> '''Chain #1''' </font> and 6 sheets belong to <font color='lightsteelblue'> '''Chain #2''' </font>. <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_secondary_structure_2/2'>Click</scene> to differentiate each chain. They are organized into 4 groups of 3 sheets, where each group is adjacent to a group belonging to the opposite chain. This ordering increases the total protein stability by interweaving the two chains, but still allows for hinged movement. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | LRRK2 additionally contains 10 alpha helices. The helices surround the beta sheets like a turtle’s shell, covering the beta sheets with the exception of one large side (belly) and the centers on the two long ends (head and tail). <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_secondary_structure_3/1'>Click</scene> to add the <font color='sienna'> '''alpha helices''' </font>. <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_secondary_structure_4/2'>Click</scene> to differentiate each chain. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Now we <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_secondary_structure_5/1'> add the loops </scene> to complete the protein chain. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Now all that is left is to <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_secondary_structure_6/1'> add the non-protein components </scene> that are featured in the overall structure. There are 2 Guanosine Diphosphate compounds shown in ball and stick representation, along with 2 Magnesium ions, represented as spheres. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | *'''Location of Hinge Structures''' | ||
- | |||
- | Each subunit of LRRK2 contains a single strand that connects the alpha helices to the beta sheets. These <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_secondary_struc_hinge/1'>strands</scene> may act as hinges during binding interactions. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | *'''Polar and Non-polar Groups''' | ||
- | |||
- | For LRRK2, when looking at the <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_surface_groups_only/1'>Surface Groups only</scene>, you see that most residues are <font color='orchid'> '''polar''' </font> there are very few <font color='darkgray'> '''non-polar''' </font>. | ||
- | |||
- | Conversely, the <scene name='48/483886/Lrrk2_buried_groups_only/1'>Buried Groups only</scene> consist almost entirely of <font color='darkgray'> '''non-polar''' </font> groups. | ||
==Binding Interactions== | ==Binding Interactions== | ||
- | <Structure load='1a84' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='pdbcode, Insert caption here' scene='48/483886/4py1_binding_1/1' /> | ||
- | + | The final stages of the synthesis of peptidoglycan requires penicillin binding proteins. All bacterial cell walls are made of peptidoglycan and it is important to note that all bacteria have reactions that covalently link the first peptidoglycan between two polysaccharides. This reaction is catalyzed by transpeptidase enzymes which is inhibited by the beta-lactam. Penicillin binding protein binds to beta-lactam antibiotics because they are similar in chemical structure to the modular pieces that form the peptidoglycan. The <scene name='48/483886/betalactem/2'>beta-lactam</scene> amide bond is ruptured to form a covalent bond with the catalytic serine at the binding protein's active site. When the PBP form a stable covalent complex with the beta-lactam antibiotics, the cell dies due to PBP inactivation. | |
- | The | + | The beta-lactam area in most drugs resemble the D-Ala-D-Ala end of peptides to which the transpeptidase enzyme binds. At the DA-DA, there is a serine 62 which is used to bind peptide strands to other stands and this is also where penicillin binds and inhibits the protein. When the transpeptidase reaction takes place, the enzymes bind to the DA-DA end of the chain which results in one of the DA residues to be released and the enzyme attaches to the end of the peptide. Next, the closest peptidoglycan is covalently linked to the first peptidoglycan which forms a crosslink between the two polysaccharides. Almost every bacterium has PBP genes but most enzymes are inhibited by the beta-lactams. The enzymes become inactive due to the drugs binding tightly to the active site and blocking the reaction. |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ==Additional Features== | |
+ | Antibiotics resistance is the property of bacteria that have receive relatively low effectiveness by antibiotic. With the overproduction and overusing of antibiotics, more bacteria have low resistance to antibiotic are killed than the bacteria have high resistance. Under the evolutionary pressure, the remaining group of bacteria have relatively high resistance which means that the normal antibiotics have less effectiveness or do not have effectiveness anymore. As penicillin-binding proteins playing an important role at bacteria’s cell synthesis and β-lactams antibiotics inhibiting bacterial division by binding penicillin-binding proteins, antibiotics resistance also emerges to the penicillin-binding proteins and makes penicillin-binding proteins have low affinity for penicillins. | ||
- | + | Normally, the bacteria produce the penicillin binding proteins with low penicillin-affinity <scene name='48/483886/Conserved_residues_of_pbp/2'>low affinity</scene> by transformation, which is a kind of gene modification. Through this way, bacteria could have a relatively higher resistance to β-lactams antibiotics. But staphylococcus is a special case, it strengthens the drug resistance by two ways instead of gene exchange. By the raised dissociation constants for the non-covalent pre-acylation and the dropped penicillin-sensitive microscopic rate constant for acylation, staphylococcus enhance its own drug resistance.<ref>PMID:15226303</ref> | |
- | < | + | And the solution to the penicillin binding proteins drug resistance could be semi-synthetic β-lactams. The mechanism is that semi-synthetic β-lactams have the alternative side chain compared to the normal penicillins and it will make penicillin binding proteins have the higher affinity to it and as a result the increasing drug resistance will be solved.<ref>PMID:3082839</ref> |
+ | ==Quiz Question 1== | ||
- | < | + | The binding pocket for PTLV (all residues within 5Å of the molecule) is shown <scene name='48/483886/Pltv_binding_pocket/1'>here</scene> colored from most conserved to most variable. |
- | + | {{Template:ColorKey_ConSurf}} | |
- | + | ||
- | + | Why are most of these residues highly conserved? | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | Would it be evolutionarily advantageous to mutate this binding pocket to prevent inhibition by PTLV? Explain. | |
- | Mutations also occur in the ROC domain and play an indirect role in kinase activity. | ||
- | Overview of Mechanism/Function | ||
- | *GTP binding in the ROC domain regulates kinase activity | ||
- | *Two PD associated residues, <scene name='48/483886/Roc_dimer/3'>R1441 and I1371</scene>, stabilize the ROC dimer | ||
- | *Mutations cause destabilization at these sites decreasing GTPase activity (and kinase activity) | ||
- | <ref>doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709098105</ref> | ||
- | <ref>doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.07.007</ref> | ||
- | <ref>doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04743.x</ref> | ||
- | <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> | ||
- | |||
- | ==Quiz Question 1== | ||
- | <Structure load='4py1' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='TYK2, 4py1, Hinge Structure' scene='48/483886/Hinge_structure/1' /> | ||
- | <br> | ||
- | The molecule shown is TYK2. Since the structure of TYK2 is almost identical to the structure of LRRK2, we will use it to simplify the concept of the <scene name='48/483886/Hinge_structure/1'>hinge structure</scene>. | ||
- | <br> | ||
- | The <scene name='48/483886/Hinge_1/3'>hinge</scene> is the only segment that connects the (mainly) <scene name='48/483886/Upper_cap/2'>beta sheet structure</scene> to the (mainly) <scene name='48/483886/Lower_cap/3'>alpha sheet structure</scene>. Various intramolecular interactions between the <font color='lime'>'''upper'''</font> and <font color='seagreen'>'''lower'''</font> segments help the protein maintain its tertiary structure. The strength of the interactions determines the rigidity of the <font color='deeppink'>'''hinge'''</font>. If we were to add several cysteine molecules that were able to form disulfide bonds between the <font color='lime'>'''upper'''</font> and <font color='seagreen'>'''lower'''</font> segments without disrupting the active site, how would the kinase be affected? In your description, include whether the mutations would primarily affect Km or Vmax, how they would affect these kinetic parameters, and give a brief explanation of why. | ||
- | <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> | ||
- | |||
- | ==Quiz Question 2== | ||
- | <Structure load='1a84' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='pdbcode, Insert caption here' scene='Insert optional scene name here' /> | ||
- | <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> | ||
- | |||
- | For our second question I am going to present a green scene with the binding pocket shown and representation of the ligand shown. The green scene will show the details of the binding pocket including the secondary structures and the residues which make them up. I will then ask the student to think about the scene and give three ways in which they could modify the ligand which would make it a better competitive inhibitor. | ||
- | |||
- | <scene name='48/483886/Practice_scene_1/2'>TextToBeDisplayed</scene> | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
- | *[[ | + | *[[Penicillin-binding protein]] |
- | *[[ | + | *[[2y2g]] |
- | *[[ | + | *[[2bg1]] |
- | *[[ | + | *[[2fff]] |
- | *[[ | + | *[[2jch]] |
==Credits== | ==Credits== | ||
- | Introduction - | + | Introduction - Anton El Khoury |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | Overall Structure - Tyler Carpenter | |
- | + | Drug Binding Site - Hyunjoon Choi | |
- | + | Additional Features - Tiankai Zhang | |
+ | Quiz Question 1 - Samuel Pierce | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Current revision
This Sandbox is Reserved from January 19, 2016, through August 31, 2016 for use for Proteopedia Team Projects by the class Chemistry 423 Biochemistry for Chemists taught by Lynmarie K Thompson at University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA. This reservation includes Sandbox Reserved 425 through Sandbox Reserved 439. |
Penicillin binding protein/lactivicin (inhibitor) (2jch)[1]
by Tyler Carpenter, Samuel Pierce, Hyunjoon Choi, Anton El Khoury and Tiankai Zhang
Student Projects for UMass Chemistry 423 Spring 2016
|