User:Karsten Theis/Takustr6

From Proteopedia

< User:Karsten Theis(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (16:56, 29 September 2020) (edit) (undo)
 
(11 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 7: Line 7:
==Results==
==Results==
-
<StructureSection load='' size='340' side='right' caption='moving up to macromolecules' scene='79/793353/2bj6/1'>
+
<StructureSection load='' size='500' side='right' caption='Saenger lab structures' scene='79/793353/2bj6/1'>
=== 1973 ===
=== 1973 ===
Line 29: Line 29:
=== 1988 - 1993 ===
=== 1988 - 1993 ===
-
Proteinase K (2PRK)
+
Proteinase K (<scene name='79/793353/2prk/1'>2PRK</scene>)
... as well as 1PEK and 1PTK
... as well as 1PEK and 1PTK
Line 35: Line 35:
=== 1992 ===
=== 1992 ===
-
Factor for inversion stimulation FIS (1FIA)
+
Factor for inversion stimulation FIS (<scene name='79/793353/2prk/2'>1FIA</scene>)
=== 1994 - 2012 ===
=== 1994 - 2012 ===
-
Tetracycline repressor (2TRT)
+
<jmol>
 +
<jmolLink>
 +
<script> load files "=2TRT" "=2TRT" "=1QPI" "=1QPI" filter "biomolecule 1"
 +
compare {3.1} {1.1} SUBSET{*.CA} ATOMS{8-155}{8-155} ROTATE TRANSLATE
 +
compare {4.1} {1.1} SUBSET{*.CA} ATOMS{8-155}{8-155} ROTATE TRANSLATE
 +
set refreshing FALSE
 +
moveto /* time, axisAngle */ 1.0 { 564 643 518 109.44} /* zoom, translation */ 110.0 0.0 0.0 /* center, rotationRadius */ {34.160000000000075 34.16000000000002 25.835952990815013} 46.11980702931616 /* navigation center, translation, depth */ {0 0 0} 0 0 0 /* cameraDepth, cameraX, cameraY */ 3.0 0.0 0.0;
 +
restrict none
 +
select 1.1 and (TAC or _MG)
 +
spacefill on
 +
select protein; backbone 0.3; color gray
 +
select 4.1 and DNA; cartoon only; color orange
 +
select 27-44 and protein; cartoon only; color skyblue
 +
animation fps 1
 +
animation mode loop
 +
animation FRAMES [1 2 3 4 3 2]
 +
set refreshing TRUE
 +
animation on
 +
</script>
 +
<text>Tetracycline repressor</text>
 +
</jmolLink>
 +
</jmol> switching back an forth between the tetracycline bound form (does not bind to DNA) and the DNA-bound form (no tetracycline bound. The two structures with neither DNA nor tetracycline bound are hypothetical and are shown to better illustrate the conformational change between the two complexes.
 +
 
 +
<jmol>
 +
<jmolRadioGroup>
 +
<item>
 +
<script>animation off; delay 1.0; model 1</script>
 +
<text>Tetracycline complex</text>
 +
</item>
 +
<item>
 +
<script>animation off; delay 1.0; model 4</script>
 +
<text>DNA complex</text>
 +
</item>
 +
<item>
 +
<script>animation off; delay 1.0; model 2</script>
 +
<text>Tetracycline hidden</text>
 +
</item>
 +
<item>
 +
<script>animation off; delay 1.0; model 3</script>
 +
<text>DNA hidden</text>
 +
</item>
 +
<item>
 +
<script>animation on</script>
 +
<text>animations</text>
 +
<checked>true</checked>
 +
 
 +
</item>
 +
 
 +
</jmolRadioGroup>
 +
</jmol>
 +
 
=== 1997 ===
=== 1997 ===
Line 46: Line 96:
=== 1998 ===
=== 1998 ===
-
<scene name='79/793353/1auk/1'>
+
<scene name='79/793353/1auk/2'>
Arylsulfatase A</scene> (1AUK)
Arylsulfatase A</scene> (1AUK)
Line 55: Line 105:
=== 1996 - 2001<ref>Karsten: Looking back, I'm amazed that only five years passed between the 4 Angstrom model and the complete atomic model of photosystem I. To me, folks working on that project were in a different space-time continuum. Everything took longer, the unit cell dimensions were crazy, the solvent content unbelievable, and then the did these things like advancing the spindle every three images because they were burning through the crystal, or using a cylindrical image plate in Japan in hopes of spreading out the overlapping diffraction spots. And then there was airport security: "No, you can't X-ray that, sorry. It's in the thermos to keep it cool. No, you can't look inside, it is light sensitive. Yes, trust me." I am still impressed by the graduate students who dared to join this project.</ref> ===
=== 1996 - 2001<ref>Karsten: Looking back, I'm amazed that only five years passed between the 4 Angstrom model and the complete atomic model of photosystem I. To me, folks working on that project were in a different space-time continuum. Everything took longer, the unit cell dimensions were crazy, the solvent content unbelievable, and then the did these things like advancing the spindle every three images because they were burning through the crystal, or using a cylindrical image plate in Japan in hopes of spreading out the overlapping diffraction spots. And then there was airport security: "No, you can't X-ray that, sorry. It's in the thermos to keep it cool. No, you can't look inside, it is light sensitive. Yes, trust me." I am still impressed by the graduate students who dared to join this project.</ref> ===
-
Photosystem I (1C51)
+
Photosystem I (1jb0)
 +
This is a big protein and takes a while to load. The <scene name='79/793353/Psi_overall/1'>figure</scene> shows a single monomer of the trimeric structure.
 +
 +
Exciton transfer: If you press the buttons, you see animations of a chlorophyll molecule getting excited by a flash of light, and transferring the energy through exciton transfer. PSI has a built in antenna system, transferring excitation energy by exciton transfer to the special pair, where the redox chemistry (charge separation) is initiated. Exciton transfer is a stochastic process so every exciton transfer pathway is different. There are two buttons to show two possiblities It's not entirely correct, but it looks pretty (inspired by the famous cytochrome picture by Irving Geis[https://www.l2molecule.com/inspirations/2015/1/24/irving-geis-and-his-paintings-of-proteins])
 +
 +
<jmol>
 +
<jmolButton>
 +
<script> script "http://proteopedia.org/wiki/images/c/c2/Psi_animation2.spt"
 +
</script>
 +
<text>random path 1</text>
 +
</jmolButton>
 +
</jmol><jmol>
 +
<jmolButton>
 +
<script> script "http://proteopedia.org/wiki/images/9/90/Psi_animation1.spt"
 +
</script>
 +
<text>random path 2</text>
 +
</jmolButton>
 +
</jmol>
 +
 +
 +
Electron transfer: Once one of the special pair chlorophylls is excited, charge separation and electron transfer take place. This <scene name='79/793353/Psi_overall/3'>figure</scene> shows the cofactors involved in transferring electrons.
=== 1999 ===
=== 1999 ===
-
Cycloamylose 26 1C58
+
Cycloamylose 26 <scene name='79/793353/1c58/2'>1C58</scene>
Line 119: Line 189:
=== Structure refinement ===
=== Structure refinement ===
1992: For every new structure, there would be two papers. The first describing the fold (in Science or Nature), the second "full paper" describing the details after refining the structure. Then, if you wanted, you would deposit your coordinates in the PDB. The diffraction data would be moved to magnetic tape as soon as a new project took up to much of your precious disk space quota.
1992: For every new structure, there would be two papers. The first describing the fold (in Science or Nature), the second "full paper" describing the details after refining the structure. Then, if you wanted, you would deposit your coordinates in the PDB. The diffraction data would be moved to magnetic tape as soon as a new project took up to much of your precious disk space quota.
 +
 +
===Theoretical and computational work ===
=== Making figures ===
=== Making figures ===
Line 133: Line 205:
== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
-
=== Weekends ===
+
see discussion page, second tab on the top
-
 
+
-
Weekends were the time you really could make progress on the graphics system or one of the purification machines. Sometimes, though, the PI would walk in and have suggestions (like "did you try to add calcium") and your plans would change.
+
-
 
+
-
=== Smoking ===
+
-
 
+
-
Famously, Joerg Labahn and Hui-Woog Choe swore on their own brands of cigarettes to generate smoke to induce nucleation in crystallization. They would smoke in the lab no matter whether they were setting up crystallization trays or not.
+
-
 
+
-
=== Secretaries ===
+
-
 
+
-
Students and guest scientists came and went, but the secretary provided institutional memory.
+
-
 
+
-
=== IT dept ===
+
-
 
+
-
=== Leibniz keks ===
+
-
 
+
-
1988: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Butterkeks.jpg/275px-Butterkeks.jpg
+
-
 
+
-
=== Surprises ===
+
-
 
+
-
The day the FAST detector got flooded... The day in seminar the PI shouted "that alpha helix is left-handed" and the speaker, after some consternation, flipped the overhead slide... The day a grad student wanted to announce to the world that crystallization of novel proteins in space works, and the post-doc recognized the units cell dimensions as those of hen-egg white lysozyme, the positive control.
+
-
 
+
-
=== Occupational hazards ===
+
-
+
-
Sometimes, you would get yelled at. Like the new students asking what the red button on the X-ray generator does while reaching for it. Or like the PI when he picked up the physical model of FIS (still in 10 amino acid segments) and started fidgeting with it, changing side chain torsion angles. Sometimes, you would get embarrassed. Like the diploma student who first learned how to crystallize RNAse T1 with TTP, and then tried to crystallize RNAse A with TTP ("what do you think the A stands for?", asked the old-hand grad student laughing out loud after the entire tray had already been set up, with the PI grinning in the background"). And folks wore special undergarments when they knew they had to spend hours in the cold room.
+
-
 
+
-
=== , respectively. ===
+
-
 
+
-
Magic word you had to use at least twice or four times in posters and papers, respectively.
+
-
 
+
-
=== Culture clashes ===
+
-
We had a variety of people, some who grew up in Berlin and had never left it (and didn't speak much English), and visitors from all over the world. Interactions weren't always smooth. The 16-year old lab tech started calling a visitor from Japan Kamikaze because he was so polite that he would quickly move to the wall of the main hallway when someone else approached him. Everyone learned how to say "yes" in Russian because one of the co-workers kept uttering "da, da, da, da" on the phone.
+
-
 
+
-
=== Myths ===
+
-
The one about the pipette tips floating in the bottled buffer solutions ("they increase the shelf-life of the buffer").
+
-
 
+
-
=== Food supply ===
+
-
Olfert Landt started two businesses during his time at Takustr 6. The Biobar was a drawer below one of the fridges stocked with candy bars. The checklist, which was evaluated weekly, was taped to the fridge. You could see who had deadlines or no other place to be by looking at the list. There was another list for coffee. Tobacco was not provided. Olfert's other business is still going strong.
+
-
 
+
-
=== Sleeping arrangements ===
+
-
Most folks had homes most of the time. On synchrotron trips, though, sleeping arrangements were sketchy. For one trip to DESY in Hamburg, the PI determined the number of reserved beds by dividing the number of travelers by two. After all, the synchrotron runs 24/7, and half of the crew should always be at the beam.
+
-
 
+
-
=== Visitors ===
+
== Footnotes ==
== Footnotes ==
<references/>
<references/>

Current revision


Introduction

The Institute of Crystallography, part of the Chemistry department of the Free University Berlin, was located at Takustrasse 6. The macromolecular crystallography was on the third floor. It is still there, but the institutional framework has changed, and a new group has moved in. This page reminisces about research done from when the group moved to Berlin to the PIs retirement.

kristallo-gr.jpg [1]

Results

Saenger lab structures

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

Methods

The third floor was one big corridor, outlining the steps in structure solution. Cold rooms on one end, crystallization and X-ray labs in the middle (along with the two grown-up offices and the seminar room) and data crunching on the other end.

Purification

Crystallization

In-house data collection

Synchrotron data collection

Data processing

Structure solution

Structure refinement

1992: For every new structure, there would be two papers. The first describing the fold (in Science or Nature), the second "full paper" describing the details after refining the structure. Then, if you wanted, you would deposit your coordinates in the PDB. The diffraction data would be moved to magnetic tape as soon as a new project took up to much of your precious disk space quota.

Theoretical and computational work

Making figures

1992: FTP (yes, that's a verb) your coordinates to the Evans-and-Sutherland vector graphic machine (sign up first). Find the perfect orientation of your model (in stereo, if necessary), apply rub-off lettering directly on the screen for labels, and set up a tripod for the camera to take pictures. If you were in a hurry, run down to the photography lab in the basement to develop your film and make copies of the negatives (unless you were making slides for a talk). Then, patiently take off all the lettering and start over because someone wanted a different view, maybe 3 degrees rotation around the y-axis.

Publishing

1992: We had computers, even PCs, but they were slow. You would find out if you had your entire PhD thesis in a single document and tried to go from chapter 1 to chapter 4 after making changes. Word had to re-paginate the entire document, which would take longer than making a pot of coffee and drinking it. Others used LaTeX on the mainframe, entering text on a VT100 terminal.

Model building

1990s: Every time a new structure was solved, we would build a physical model. Well, we would have a crystallography course, and participants would build stretches of ten amino acids from a list of main-chain and side-chain torsion angles. Then, we would assemble those on a wooden board with aluminum stakes, guided by the projection of the C-alpha trace taped to the wooden board. At the end, the technician from downstairs would build a plexiglass housing to avoid tampering with the structure (see Discussion, occupational hazards). It was reminiscent of a hunter putting skulls and antlers of the kill on the wall.

Conferences

Discussion

see discussion page, second tab on the top

Footnotes

  1. Karsten: back then, you could ask for a specific PDB ID, and researchers tried to get one that fit their project. nRNT for RNase T1 is pretty good, but at one point the lab ran out of digits
  2. Karsten: Looking back, I'm amazed that only five years passed between the 4 Angstrom model and the complete atomic model of photosystem I. To me, folks working on that project were in a different space-time continuum. Everything took longer, the unit cell dimensions were crazy, the solvent content unbelievable, and then the did these things like advancing the spindle every three images because they were burning through the crystal, or using a cylindrical image plate in Japan in hopes of spreading out the overlapping diffraction spots. And then there was airport security: "No, you can't X-ray that, sorry. It's in the thermos to keep it cool. No, you can't look inside, it is light sensitive. Yes, trust me." I am still impressed by the graduate students who dared to join this project.

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Karsten Theis

Personal tools