1vjq
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| (11 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | [[Image:1vjq.gif|left|200px]] | ||
| - | + | ==Designed protein based on backbone conformation of procarboxypeptidase-A (1AYE) with sidechains chosen for maximal predicted stability.== | |
| - | + | <StructureSection load='1vjq' size='340' side='right'caption='[[1vjq]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 2.10Å' scene=''> | |
| - | + | == Structural highlights == | |
| - | + | <table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[1vjq]] is a 2 chain structure. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=1VJQ OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=1VJQ FirstGlance]. <br> | |
| - | + | </td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">X-ray diffraction, [[Resolution|Resolution]] 2.098Å</td></tr> | |
| - | + | <tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=MSE:SELENOMETHIONINE'>MSE</scene></td></tr> | |
| - | + | <tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=1vjq FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=1vjq OCA], [https://pdbe.org/1vjq PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1vjq RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/1vjq PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=1vjq ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | |
| - | + | </table> | |
| - | + | == Evolutionary Conservation == | |
| - | + | [[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]] | |
| - | + | Check<jmol> | |
| - | == | + | <jmolCheckbox> |
| + | <scriptWhenChecked>; select protein; define ~consurf_to_do selected; consurf_initial_scene = true; script "/wiki/ConSurf/vj/1vjq_consurf.spt"</scriptWhenChecked> | ||
| + | <scriptWhenUnchecked>script /wiki/extensions/Proteopedia/spt/initialview03.spt</scriptWhenUnchecked> | ||
| + | <text>to colour the structure by Evolutionary Conservation</text> | ||
| + | </jmolCheckbox> | ||
| + | </jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=1vjq ConSurf]. | ||
| + | <div style="clear:both"></div> | ||
| + | <div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | ||
| + | == Publication Abstract from PubMed == | ||
A previously developed computer program for protein design, RosettaDesign, was used to predict low free energy sequences for nine naturally occurring protein backbones. RosettaDesign had no knowledge of the naturally occurring sequences and on average 65% of the residues in the designed sequences differ from wild-type. Synthetic genes for ten completely redesigned proteins were generated, and the proteins were expressed, purified, and then characterized using circular dichroism, chemical and temperature denaturation and NMR experiments. Although high-resolution structures have not yet been determined, eight of these proteins appear to be folded and their circular dichroism spectra are similar to those of their wild-type counterparts. Six of the proteins have stabilities equal to or up to 7kcal/mol greater than their wild-type counterparts, and four of the proteins have NMR spectra consistent with a well-packed, rigid structure. These encouraging results indicate that the computational protein design methods can, with significant reliability, identify amino acid sequences compatible with a target protein backbone. | A previously developed computer program for protein design, RosettaDesign, was used to predict low free energy sequences for nine naturally occurring protein backbones. RosettaDesign had no knowledge of the naturally occurring sequences and on average 65% of the residues in the designed sequences differ from wild-type. Synthetic genes for ten completely redesigned proteins were generated, and the proteins were expressed, purified, and then characterized using circular dichroism, chemical and temperature denaturation and NMR experiments. Although high-resolution structures have not yet been determined, eight of these proteins appear to be folded and their circular dichroism spectra are similar to those of their wild-type counterparts. Six of the proteins have stabilities equal to or up to 7kcal/mol greater than their wild-type counterparts, and four of the proteins have NMR spectra consistent with a well-packed, rigid structure. These encouraging results indicate that the computational protein design methods can, with significant reliability, identify amino acid sequences compatible with a target protein backbone. | ||
| - | + | A large scale test of computational protein design: folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins.,Dantas G, Kuhlman B, Callender D, Wong M, Baker D J Mol Biol. 2003 Sep 12;332(2):449-60. PMID:012948494<ref>PMID:012948494</ref> | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | |
| - | + | </div> | |
| - | + | <div class="pdbe-citations 1vjq" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div> | |
| - | + | == References == | |
| - | + | <references/> | |
| - | + | __TOC__ | |
| - | + | </StructureSection> | |
| - | [[Category: | + | [[Category: Large Structures]] |
| - | [[Category: | + | [[Category: Baker D]] |
| - | [[Category: | + | [[Category: Merritt EA]] |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
Current revision
Designed protein based on backbone conformation of procarboxypeptidase-A (1AYE) with sidechains chosen for maximal predicted stability.
| |||||||||||
