HOAT1
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| (17 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==Structure Tour== | ==Structure Tour== | ||
<StructureSection load='9kkk' size='340' side='right'caption='Cryo-EM structure of human SLC22A6 (OAT1) in the apo-state, [[Resolution|resolution]] 3.85Å' scene=''> | <StructureSection load='9kkk' size='340' side='right'caption='Cryo-EM structure of human SLC22A6 (OAT1) in the apo-state, [[Resolution|resolution]] 3.85Å' scene=''> | ||
| + | Classification: MEMBRANE PROTEIN | ||
| + | |||
| + | Organism(s): Homo sapiens | ||
| + | |||
| + | Expression System: Homo sapiens | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mutation(s): No | ||
| + | |||
| + | Deposited: 2024-11-13 Released: 2025-11-05 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Deposition Author(s): Jeon, H.M., Eun, J., Kim, Y. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Funding Organization(s): National Research Foundation (NRF, Korea) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Experimental Data Snapshot''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Method: ELECTRON MICROSCOPY | ||
| + | |||
| + | Resolution: 3.85 Å | ||
| + | |||
| + | Aggregation State: PARTICLE | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reconstruction Method: SINGLE PARTICLE | ||
| + | |||
===Introduction=== | ===Introduction=== | ||
| Line 51: | Line 75: | ||
===Cryo-EM structure of hOAT1=== | ===Cryo-EM structure of hOAT1=== | ||
| - | + | [[Image:Hoat1domain.png |HEIGHT1=200|WIDTH1=200|frame| right| Fig 1. (A) Schematic diagram of human OAT1 topology | |
| + | and the overall transport process.]] | ||
The apo state structure of human Organic Anion Transporter 1 (hOAT1), determined by cryo-EM, reveals the transporter in an inward-facing conformation. This means the central substrate-binding cavity is open toward the intracellular side of the membrane, ready to release a substrate or accept one from the cytoplasm. | The apo state structure of human Organic Anion Transporter 1 (hOAT1), determined by cryo-EM, reveals the transporter in an inward-facing conformation. This means the central substrate-binding cavity is open toward the intracellular side of the membrane, ready to release a substrate or accept one from the cytoplasm. | ||
'''Key Structural Characteristics:''' | '''Key Structural Characteristics:''' | ||
*'''Overall Fold:''' | *'''Overall Fold:''' | ||
| - | + | :*Adopts the classic Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) fold. | |
| - | + | :*Comprises 12 transmembrane helices (TMs 1-12). | |
| - | + | :*Exhibits pseudo-two-fold symmetry, divided into an N-lobe (TMs 1-6) and a C-lobe (TMs 7-12). | |
*'''Central Binding Cavity:''' | *'''Central Binding Cavity:''' | ||
| - | + | :*The cavity is located between the N-lobe (formed by TM1, TM2, TM4, TM5) and the C-lobe (formed by TM7, TM8, TM10, TM11). | |
| - | + | :*It possesses a positively charged electrostatic environment, which explains its strong preference for transporting anionic substrates. | |
| - | + | :*The cavity is lined by 29 residues, forming a hydrophobic and aromatic-rich environment. | |
*'''Cavity Borders and Cytosolic Gate:''' | *'''Cavity Borders and Cytosolic Gate:''' | ||
| - | + | :*The top border (extracellular side) of the cavity is formed by residues including N35, Y230, Y353, and Y354 and are involved in substrate recognition | |
| - | + | :*The bottom border (cytosolic side) features a narrow "thin bottom gate" formed by residues M207 and F442. The interaction between these two residues splits the cytosolic entrance into two distinct pathways: | |
| - | + | ::*Path A: Located between TM2 and TM11. | |
| - | + | ::*Path B: Located between TM5 and TM8. | |
| - | + | :*This suggests that aromatic residues located at the top border are important for extracellular anion binding, while residues at the bottom play a role in exporting extracellular anions to the cytoplasmic side. | |
| - | : | + | *'''Conformational State:''' |
| - | + | :*In the apo state, the transporter is in a relaxed, inward-open conformation, providing access for substrates from the cytoplasm. | |
===Olmesartan recognition by hOAT1=== | ===Olmesartan recognition by hOAT1=== | ||
The structural and functional analysis of <scene name='85/857155/Olsmartin/1'>hOAT1 in complex with the high-affinity antihypertensive drug olmesartan</scene> provides a detailed blueprint for substrate specificity and binding. | The structural and functional analysis of <scene name='85/857155/Olsmartin/1'>hOAT1 in complex with the high-affinity antihypertensive drug olmesartan</scene> provides a detailed blueprint for substrate specificity and binding. | ||
| - | + | *Olmesartan binds within the central cavity of hOAT1 in an inward-facing conformation where it occupies Site 3 of the binding pocket. The drug adopts a diagonal orientation relative to the membrane plane, a pose that requires more space than the smaller inhibitor probenecid. | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | *Olmesartan occupies Site 3 of the binding pocket and is located within 5A˚ distance of residues of TM1, TM4, TM5, TM7, TM10, and TM11, namely N35, M207, G227, Y230, W346, Y353, Y354, F438, F442, S462, and R466. | ||
===Mechanism of OAT1 inhibition by probenecid=== | ===Mechanism of OAT1 inhibition by probenecid=== | ||
| Line 147: | Line 123: | ||
'''1. Binding Mode and Direct Competition''' | '''1. Binding Mode and Direct Competition''' | ||
| - | *Probenecid binds at the top of the central cavity, parallel to the membrane plane. | + | *Probenecid binds at the top of the central cavity, parallel to the membrane plane. Its binding site overlaps with both Site 1 (partially) and Site 3. |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | *In the binding pocket of Site 1, surrounded by 16 residues located within a 5 A ˚ (M31, N35, M142, V145, G227, Y230, W346, Y353, Y354, K382, D378, F438, S462, A465, R466, and S469). | |
'''2. Conformational Arrest and Cytoplasmic Path Blockage''' | '''2. Conformational Arrest and Cytoplasmic Path Blockage''' | ||
| - | The primary inhibitory mechanism is a probenecid-induced conformational change that physically blocks substrate access and exit. | + | The primary inhibitory mechanism is a probenecid-induced conformational change that physically blocks substrate access and exit. Compared to the apo state, the cytoplasmic opening of the binding pocket narrows from ~15 Å to ~12 Å in the probenecid-bound state. Probenecid binding narrows Path A and completely blocks Path B. Restriction of the access route to path B likely limits the entry of substrates to Site 1 and the exit of substrates from the binding pocket. |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
This structural rearrangement is caused by a slight inward movement of the cytoplasmic ends of TM5, TM8, TM10, and TM11 toward the binding pocket. | This structural rearrangement is caused by a slight inward movement of the cytoplasmic ends of TM5, TM8, TM10, and TM11 toward the binding pocket. | ||
| Line 175: | Line 135: | ||
'''3. Locked Conformation''' | '''3. Locked Conformation''' | ||
| + | By constricting the cytoplasmic access routes, probenecid does not just compete for the substrate-binding site; it stabilizes the transporter in an apo-like, inward-facing conformation that is inaccessible to cytosolic substrates. This prevents the entry of new substrates and likely traps the transporter in this non-functional state, effectively "locking" it and preventing the conformational changes necessary for the transport cycle. | ||
| + | ===Mechanistic Insights into hOAT1 Function and Inhibition=== | ||
| - | + | [[Image:HOAT1mechanism.png | frame |300px| upright= 1.5 |none | alt= | Fig 2. Mechanism of olmesartan binding and conformational inhibition by probenecid. A) When the transporter is in its outward-facing conformation, substrates or inhibitors enter the central binding pocket and undergo structural rearrangement to | |
| - | + | ||
| - | [[Image:HOAT1mechanism.png | frame | upright= 1.5 |none | alt= | Fig | + | |
the inward-facing conformation. When olmesartan interacts with the bottom gating residues M207 and F442, the side chains S203, Y230 (not shown here), and | the inward-facing conformation. When olmesartan interacts with the bottom gating residues M207 and F442, the side chains S203, Y230 (not shown here), and | ||
R466 appear to rearrange to coordinate with a chloride ion and drug compared to the apo structure. Whereas probenecid binding induces an additional | R466 appear to rearrange to coordinate with a chloride ion and drug compared to the apo structure. Whereas probenecid binding induces an additional | ||
conformation change for inhibition (apo-like conformation).]] | conformation change for inhibition (apo-like conformation).]] | ||
| - | ''' | + | ''' A Dual-Mechanism for Potent Inhibition by Probenecid''' |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | The study reveals that the classic inhibitor probenecid employs a sophisticated, dual-mechanism to arrest OAT1 function, moving beyond simple competition. | |
| + | '''Direct Competition:''' Probenecid occupies the central binding pocket, and its interaction with K382 in Site 1 directly competes with the binding of the counter-substrate α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). This disrupts the exchange cycle that drives substrate transport. | ||
| + | '''Conformational Arrest:''' More significantly, probenecid binding induces subtle conformational changes in the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane helices (TM5, TM8, TM10, TM11). This leads to a constriction of the cytosolic opening, completely blocking one access path (Path B) and narrowing the other (Path A). This physically prevents substrates from entering or exiting the binding site from the cytoplasm, effectively "locking" the transporter in an inactive, inward-facing state. This mechanism is reminiscent of inhibition seen in other transporters like hURAT1, suggesting it may be a general strategy for effective transport arrest. | ||
| + | ===Conclusion=== | ||
| + | rOAT1 structures with probenecid have been reported previously, <ref>Parker, J.L., Kato, T., Kuteyi, G., Sitsel, O., and Newstead, S. (2023). | ||
| + | Molecular basis for selective uptake and elimination of organic anions in | ||
| + | the kidney by OAT1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1786–1793. https://doi. | ||
| + | org/10.1038/s41594-023-01039-y.</ref> and our hOAT1 structures align with findings for rOAT1 and provide new insights into the mechanism by which probenecid inhibits transport activity. Additionally, this study reveals the structure of hOAT1 with olmesartan, offering mechanistic insights into species-specific differences in OAT1 transport of specific substrates. | ||
==Notes & References== | ==Notes & References== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Current revision
Interactive 3D Complement in Proteopedia
|
| |
|
Cryo-EM structures of human OAT1 reveal drug binding and inhibition mechanisms[1]. | |
|
Cell Volume 33, Issue 11, P1856-1866.E5, November 06, 2025 |
Structure Tour
| |||||||||||



