Retractions and Fraud
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A number of [[PDB]] entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes. | A number of [[PDB]] entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes. | ||
| - | * [[3k78]] was removed from the [[PDB]] | + | * 2012, February: [[3k78]] was removed from the [[PDB]] because it appears to be fraudlent<ref>PMID: 22552066</ref><ref>[http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/protein-structure-retracted-after-investigation-into-highly-improbable-features-journal-calls-it-fraud/ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud], April 2012</ref>. |
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 01:56, 12 May 2012
A number of PDB entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes.
References
- ↑ Abbott A. Trial tests Austrian integrity body. Nature. 2012 May 1;485(7396):15. doi: 10.1038/485015a. PMID:22552066 doi:10.1038/485015a
- ↑ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud, April 2012
