Retractions and Fraud
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* 2012, February: [[3k78]] was removed from the [[PDB]] because it appears to be fraudlent<ref>PMID: 22552066</ref><ref>[http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/protein-structure-retracted-after-investigation-into-highly-improbable-features-journal-calls-it-fraud/ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud], April 2012</ref>. | * 2012, February: [[3k78]] was removed from the [[PDB]] because it appears to be fraudlent<ref>PMID: 22552066</ref><ref>[http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/protein-structure-retracted-after-investigation-into-highly-improbable-features-journal-calls-it-fraud/ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud], April 2012</ref>. | ||
| - | * 2009 and subsequently, several entries authored by H.M. Krishna Murthy were removed from the [[PDB]] as they appear to be fraudulent. Those already removed, as well as those for which removal is pending, are listed at [[Template:Murthy_fraud|Murthy fraud]]. See also this list of [[Template:Possible_fraud|possibly fraudlent]] entries co-authored by Murthy. See the statement by the Worldwide PDB<ref name="wwpdb-retractions" />. | + | * 2009 and subsequently, several entries authored by H.M. Krishna Murthy were removed from the [[PDB]] as they appear to be fraudulent. Those already removed, as well as those for which removal is pending, are listed at [[Template:Murthy_fraud|Murthy fraud]]. See also this list of [[Template:Possible_fraud|possibly fraudlent]] entries co-authored by Murthy. See the statement by the Worldwide PDB<ref name="wwpdb-retractions" /> and the discussion of fraud<ref>[https://lists.sdsc.edu/pipermail/pdb-l/2009-December/004991.html Discussion of fraud on the PDB email list].</ref> on the PDB email list and the official statement by the University of Alabama<ref>[http://main.uab.edu/Sites/reporter/articles/71570/ Official statement by the University of Alabama on fraudlent PDB entries by H. M. Krishna Murthy ]. This statement includes detailed information about the analysis of each entry by outside experts.</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 02:14, 12 May 2012
A number of PDB entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes[1].
- 2009 and subsequently, several entries authored by H.M. Krishna Murthy were removed from the PDB as they appear to be fraudulent. Those already removed, as well as those for which removal is pending, are listed at Murthy fraud. See also this list of possibly fraudlent entries co-authored by Murthy. See the statement by the Worldwide PDB[1] and the discussion of fraud[4] on the PDB email list and the official statement by the University of Alabama[5]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 wwPDB Statement on Retraction of PDB Entries.
- ↑ Abbott A. Trial tests Austrian integrity body. Nature. 2012 May 1;485(7396):15. doi: 10.1038/485015a. PMID:22552066 doi:10.1038/485015a
- ↑ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud, April 2012
- ↑ Discussion of fraud on the PDB email list.
- ↑ Official statement by the University of Alabama on fraudlent PDB entries by H. M. Krishna Murthy . This statement includes detailed information about the analysis of each entry by outside experts.
