Extremophile
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Salty condition can be overcome with extra Negative surface charge density == | == Salty condition can be overcome with extra Negative surface charge density == | ||
- | The green alga Dunaliella salina lives in an environment where salt levels change swiftly and dramatically from low to high salt concentrations (see an interesting Scientific American article about life in the Dead Sea of Israel [http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/artful-amoeba/2011/10/09/fountains-of-life-found-at-the-bottom-of-the-dead-sea/]). The problem for its extra-cellular proteins is staying soluble in both solvents. Professors Sussman and Zamir from the Weizmann Institute report the first such protein crystal structure and suggest that the protein's relative increase of negative surface charge density turns the protein into a anion-like molecule capable of dissolving in high salt. However, unlike the halophilic enzyme from Haloarcula marismortui which Profs. Sussman and Maverach (Tel Aviv University) crystallized earlier, the negative surface charge is not so high that the protein becomes insoluble in lower salt concentrations. The three-way comparison between the salt-adapting properties of a mesophilic, halotolerant, and halophilic enzyme illuminates a biophysical strategy for tuning protein structures to extreme salt conditions. | + | The green alga ''Dunaliella salina'' lives in an environment where salt levels change swiftly and dramatically from low to high salt concentrations (see an interesting ''Scientific American'' article about life in the Dead Sea of Israel [http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/artful-amoeba/2011/10/09/fountains-of-life-found-at-the-bottom-of-the-dead-sea/]). The problem for its extra-cellular proteins is staying soluble in both solvents. Professors Sussman and Zamir from the Weizmann Institute report the first such protein crystal structure and suggest that the protein's relative increase of negative surface charge density turns the protein into a anion-like molecule capable of dissolving in high salt. However, unlike the halophilic enzyme from ''Haloarcula marismortui'' which Profs. Sussman and Maverach (Tel Aviv University) crystallized earlier, the negative surface charge is not so high that the protein becomes insoluble in lower salt concentrations. The three-way comparison between the salt-adapting properties of a mesophilic, halotolerant, and halophilic enzyme illuminates a biophysical strategy for tuning protein structures to extreme salt conditions. |
In the list below, the increasing negative charge density on the surface is apparent. Notice also that while the halotolerant enzyme (middle) switches positive amino acids to neutral, the halophilic enzyme (last), also switches neutral amino acids to become negative. | In the list below, the increasing negative charge density on the surface is apparent. Notice also that while the halotolerant enzyme (middle) switches positive amino acids to neutral, the halophilic enzyme (last), also switches neutral amino acids to become negative. | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== High temperatures encourage using proline to lower Entropy loss and between-chain ion-network bonding to increase enthalpy gain == | == High temperatures encourage using proline to lower Entropy loss and between-chain ion-network bonding to increase enthalpy gain == | ||
- | Some bacteria and even animals can survive great temperatures. Studying <scene name='JMS/sandbox5/Tbadh/1'>a thermophilic enzyme</scene> ([[1ykf]]), Prof. Burstein noticed two special features that appear to explain this enzymes ability to maintain its structure in over 83℃! For comparison, you could fry an egg at 65℃, which mean all the protein in an egg denature at significantly less than 83℃. To demonstrate the special structural properties of the thermophilic enzyme underlies its thermophilic prowess, Prof Burstein selectively altered normal enzymes to have the two structural features, and indeed found that the normal enzymes had become thermophilic. The two properties relate to ∆H and to ∆S. Firstly, he found the thermophilic enzyme had a unique <scene name='JMS/sandbox5/Ion_network/4'>four amino acid binding-network</scene> that encompassed two monomers of the tetrameric enzyme, repeating between each monomer and its two partner monomers. This network apparently makes the oligomer more stable, or ∆H more negative. Secondly, the thermophilic enzyme was <scene name='JMS/sandbox5/Proline/2'>enriched for proline</scene>. Because proline's side chain has minimal degree of freedom, proline's, unlike other amino acids, are minimally restricted by folding. Therefore, ∆S is less negative. | + | Some bacteria and even animals can survive great temperatures. Studying <scene name='JMS/sandbox5/Tbadh/1'>a thermophilic enzyme</scene> ([[1ykf]]), Prof. Burstein noticed two special features that appear to explain this enzymes ability to maintain its structure in over 83℃ (!) For comparison, you could fry an egg at 65℃, which mean all the protein in an egg denature at significantly less than 83℃. To demonstrate the special structural properties of the thermophilic enzyme underlies its thermophilic prowess, Prof Burstein selectively altered normal enzymes to have the two structural features, and indeed found that the normal enzymes had become thermophilic. The two properties relate to ∆H and to ∆S. Firstly, he found the thermophilic enzyme had a unique <scene name='JMS/sandbox5/Ion_network/4'>four amino acid binding-network</scene> that encompassed two monomers of the tetrameric enzyme, repeating between each monomer and its two partner monomers. This network apparently makes the oligomer more stable, or ∆H more negative. Secondly, the thermophilic enzyme was <scene name='JMS/sandbox5/Proline/2'>enriched for proline</scene>. Because proline's side chain has minimal degree of freedom, proline's, unlike other amino acids, are minimally restricted by folding. Therefore, ∆S is less negative. |
</StructureSection> | </StructureSection> |
Revision as of 16:10, 25 April 2013
|
Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)
Joseph M. Steinberger, Joel L. Sussman, Alexander Berchansky, Michal Harel