Sandbox Wabash 02 Fumarase

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
'''Determination of the True Active Site of Fumarase C from E. Coli'''.
'''Determination of the True Active Site of Fumarase C from E. Coli'''.
Fumarase C from E. coli is an enzyme homologous to the cytosolic and mitochondrial enzymes found in eukaryotic cells. It catalyzes the hydration/dehydration reaction between the metabolites L-malate and fumarate. Eukaryotic fumarases have been studied extensively by classical kinetic and isotope labeling methods (Hill & Teipel, 1971; Cleveland, 1977). Fumarase from E. coli is less well characterized. Two basic groups are thought to be involved in the overall catalytic process. The first (B1) is responsible for the removal of a proton from the C3 position of L-malate, resulting in a carbanion stabilized by an acid-carboxylate intermediate formed at C4. The last stage of the catalytic process is thought to involve a second basic group on the protein labeled B2. In the direction of fumarate production, this basic group would be protonated and the removal of the -OH from C2 results in the formation of a water molecule. The proton at B1 in Figure 1 has unusual properties and is believed to be removed as the next substrate molecule binds (Rose et al., 1992). The crystallographic studies of wild-type fumarase indicated that the enzyme had an unusual subunit arrangement with a core of 20 alpha-helices, 5 from each of the subunits (Weaver et al., 1995). Subsequent crystallographic studies with several inhibitors including pyromellitic acid and beta-trimethylsilyl maleate produced some unexpected results. Although both are related to the normal substrate, they are bound to different sites. The original tungstate site, a heavy atom derivative, was also the binding site of the inhibitors citrate and pyromellitic acid. This was labeled the A-site and is comprised of atoms from three of the four subunits (Weaver & Banaszak, 1996). The second site contained L-malate in the native crystals and beta-trimethylsilyl maleate in another crystallographic study (Weaver & Banaszak, 1996), and was labeled the B-site and was formed by atoms from a single subunit. The results led to the dilemma as to which of the two sites was the active site.
Fumarase C from E. coli is an enzyme homologous to the cytosolic and mitochondrial enzymes found in eukaryotic cells. It catalyzes the hydration/dehydration reaction between the metabolites L-malate and fumarate. Eukaryotic fumarases have been studied extensively by classical kinetic and isotope labeling methods (Hill & Teipel, 1971; Cleveland, 1977). Fumarase from E. coli is less well characterized. Two basic groups are thought to be involved in the overall catalytic process. The first (B1) is responsible for the removal of a proton from the C3 position of L-malate, resulting in a carbanion stabilized by an acid-carboxylate intermediate formed at C4. The last stage of the catalytic process is thought to involve a second basic group on the protein labeled B2. In the direction of fumarate production, this basic group would be protonated and the removal of the -OH from C2 results in the formation of a water molecule. The proton at B1 in Figure 1 has unusual properties and is believed to be removed as the next substrate molecule binds (Rose et al., 1992). The crystallographic studies of wild-type fumarase indicated that the enzyme had an unusual subunit arrangement with a core of 20 alpha-helices, 5 from each of the subunits (Weaver et al., 1995). Subsequent crystallographic studies with several inhibitors including pyromellitic acid and beta-trimethylsilyl maleate produced some unexpected results. Although both are related to the normal substrate, they are bound to different sites. The original tungstate site, a heavy atom derivative, was also the binding site of the inhibitors citrate and pyromellitic acid. This was labeled the A-site and is comprised of atoms from three of the four subunits (Weaver & Banaszak, 1996). The second site contained L-malate in the native crystals and beta-trimethylsilyl maleate in another crystallographic study (Weaver & Banaszak, 1996), and was labeled the B-site and was formed by atoms from a single subunit. The results led to the dilemma as to which of the two sites was the active site.
 +
 +
<scene name='72/726360/Wild-type_b-site/1'>Wild-Type B-Site</scene>
The discovery that fumarase harbored two adjacent anion binding sites led to the dilemma as to which site was the active site (Weaver & Banaszak, 1996). The H129N and H188N mutants were generated to resolve the two site problem. The fact that fumarase is only active as a tetramer provided strong initial support for the A-site being the active site because it has components from three subunits (Weaver et al., 1995). It was suspected that the A-site was the active site because of the observation that no active monomeric form of fumarase has ever been described, and the A-site was formed by residues from three of the four subunits. Because the biochemical data suggested that a histidine side chain was one of the bases participating in the catalytic reaction (Brant et al.. 1963), testing whether H129 or H188 affected catalytic activity appeared to offer a way of resolving the two site dilemma. Evidence as to which of the two ligand binding sites was indeed the catalytic site should be obtainable by mutating the histidines at the two different sites. If the A-site was the active site, changing H188 should dramatically affect the catalytic activity. Conversely, if the B-site was the active site then a mutation at H129 should affect catalysis.
The discovery that fumarase harbored two adjacent anion binding sites led to the dilemma as to which site was the active site (Weaver & Banaszak, 1996). The H129N and H188N mutants were generated to resolve the two site problem. The fact that fumarase is only active as a tetramer provided strong initial support for the A-site being the active site because it has components from three subunits (Weaver et al., 1995). It was suspected that the A-site was the active site because of the observation that no active monomeric form of fumarase has ever been described, and the A-site was formed by residues from three of the four subunits. Because the biochemical data suggested that a histidine side chain was one of the bases participating in the catalytic reaction (Brant et al.. 1963), testing whether H129 or H188 affected catalytic activity appeared to offer a way of resolving the two site dilemma. Evidence as to which of the two ligand binding sites was indeed the catalytic site should be obtainable by mutating the histidines at the two different sites. If the A-site was the active site, changing H188 should dramatically affect the catalytic activity. Conversely, if the B-site was the active site then a mutation at H129 should affect catalysis.

Revision as of 18:32, 28 February 2016

Wabash Sandbox 02 Fumarase

Caption for this structure

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

References

  1. Hanson, R. M., Prilusky, J., Renjian, Z., Nakane, T. and Sussman, J. L. (2013), JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia. Isr. J. Chem., 53:207-216. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300024
  2. Herraez A. Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006 Jul;34(4):255-61. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644. PMID:21638687 doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644
Personal tools