Sandbox Reserved 1458
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Structural highlights == | == Structural highlights == | ||
Here is a <scene name='79/799586/4x2z1/2'>cartoon view</scene> of PLpro, it's main secondary features are mainly beta sheets and with alpha helixes and a little less random coils. | Here is a <scene name='79/799586/4x2z1/2'>cartoon view</scene> of PLpro, it's main secondary features are mainly beta sheets and with alpha helixes and a little less random coils. | ||
- | In this <scene name='79/799586/4x2zb/1'>cartoon view</scene> the most important tertiary and quaternary structures of PLpro are highlighted | + | In this <scene name='79/799586/4x2zb/1'>cartoon view</scene> the most important tertiary and quaternary structures of PLpro are highlighted. They include the P4 residues which is the resides that the most impact on catalytic efficiency. |
- | This is a <scene name='79/799586/4z2zspacefill/1'>space filling</scene> view of PLpro | + | This is a <scene name='79/799586/4z2zspacefill/1'>space filling</scene> view of PLpro where it shows how much space the atoms take up in the protein. |
- | Here is a <scene name='79/799586/4x2zhydrophobicity/1'>hydrophobicity-focused view</scene> of PLpro, the importance of hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions are that they | + | Here is a <scene name='79/799586/4x2zhydrophobicity/1'>hydrophobicity-focused view</scene> of PLpro, the importance of hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions are that they determine how the proteins fold and that is the case in PLpro as well. PLpro has a mix of hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions. |
- | Here is a view of the ligand. The important chemical features of the ligand are | + | Here is a view of the ligand. The important chemical features of the ligand is that they form H bonds with each other and have metal interactions with Zinc. The amino acids that interact with the ligand are Cystine, Threonine and Arginine. Cystine interacts with Zn through metal interactions as well as forms H bonds with other Cystines and Threonine. |
- | This is the catalytic triad and it helps the protein achieve its function by | + | This is the catalytic triad and it helps the protein achieve its function by helping the protein reveal key differences in substrate binding sites of PLpros. Specifically the P3 and P4 sub sites and the residues that interact with the-barrel of ubiquitin are different. This suggest a difference in catalytic activity. It helps the protein function more efficiently by revealing and opening up different binding sites. The catalytic triad include D275, H264, C101. |
- | The active site is pictured here and has the key amino acids highlighted. Those key amino acids are . | + | |
+ | The active site is pictured here and has the key amino acids highlighted. Those key amino acids are W156, D223, N155 and IIe. W156 is involved in shaping the S2 subsite for a glycine, D223 and N155 help form the pocket and shape active site. IIe replaces T302 which obstructs the placement of the side chain of lysine residue causing BL1 to be moved creating a larger pocket. | ||
h | h | ||
This is a sample scene created with SAT to <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/1">color</scene> by Group, and another to make <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/2">a transparent representation</scene> of the protein. You can make your own scenes on SAT starting from scratch or loading and editing one of these sample scenes. | This is a sample scene created with SAT to <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/1">color</scene> by Group, and another to make <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/2">a transparent representation</scene> of the protein. You can make your own scenes on SAT starting from scratch or loading and editing one of these sample scenes. | ||
- | + | == Kinetic Data == | |
This article compares the kinetic parameters of PLpros from different COVs. Sars COV followed by IBV had higher catalytic efficiencies than MERS COV. This information helps tell us what the proteins can cleave at a given catalytic efficiency. This allows them to see the relationship between the two and see at what catalytic efficiency can the protein still operate and function properly. | This article compares the kinetic parameters of PLpros from different COVs. Sars COV followed by IBV had higher catalytic efficiencies than MERS COV. This information helps tell us what the proteins can cleave at a given catalytic efficiency. This allows them to see the relationship between the two and see at what catalytic efficiency can the protein still operate and function properly. | ||
</StructureSection> | </StructureSection> |
Revision as of 16:49, 17 November 2018
This Sandbox is Reserved from October 22, 2018 through April 30, 2019 for use in the course Biochemistry taught by Bonnie Hall at the Grand View University, Des Moines, IA USA. This reservation includes Sandbox Reserved 1456 through Sandbox Reserved 1470. |
To get started:
More help: Help:Editing |
PLpro
|
References
Kong, L., et al. “Structural View and Substrate Specificity of Papain-like Protease from Avian Infectious Bronchitis Virus.” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 290, no. 11, 13 Mar. 2015, pp. 7160–7168.,
- ↑ Hanson, R. M., Prilusky, J., Renjian, Z., Nakane, T. and Sussman, J. L. (2013), JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia. Isr. J. Chem., 53:207-216. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300024
- ↑ Herraez A. Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006 Jul;34(4):255-61. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644. PMID:21638687 doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644