Rubisco and Crop Output

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 24: Line 24:
Most plants are C3 or C4 plants. This is based off whether they use C3 or C4 intermediates. C3 plants are more accustomed to cooler temperatures, as opposed to C4 plants that are found in warmer temperatures. <scene name='81/814059/Photorespiration/2'>Photorespiration</scene> is more likely to occur in C4 plants than C3 plants, because C4 plants grow in warmer climates. As temperatures begin to increase, so does photorespiration. Plants are more likely to dehydrate in the warm weather. This forces them to close the stomata in order to conserve water. When the plant closes the stomata, CO2 is prevented from entering the leaf. Photorespiration is when Rubisco binds O2 instead of CO2. This is contrary to the general pattern of photosynthesis, where Rubisco binds to CO2 instead of O2. Rubisco acts differently in C4 than C3 plants. To reduce photorespiration, C4 plants can “harvest” CO2 in bundle sheath cells. They also are useful at collecting carbon and using less water in warmer climates.
Most plants are C3 or C4 plants. This is based off whether they use C3 or C4 intermediates. C3 plants are more accustomed to cooler temperatures, as opposed to C4 plants that are found in warmer temperatures. <scene name='81/814059/Photorespiration/2'>Photorespiration</scene> is more likely to occur in C4 plants than C3 plants, because C4 plants grow in warmer climates. As temperatures begin to increase, so does photorespiration. Plants are more likely to dehydrate in the warm weather. This forces them to close the stomata in order to conserve water. When the plant closes the stomata, CO2 is prevented from entering the leaf. Photorespiration is when Rubisco binds O2 instead of CO2. This is contrary to the general pattern of photosynthesis, where Rubisco binds to CO2 instead of O2. Rubisco acts differently in C4 than C3 plants. To reduce photorespiration, C4 plants can “harvest” CO2 in bundle sheath cells. They also are useful at collecting carbon and using less water in warmer climates.
-
 
+
The major problem researchers have been working to change with Rubisco is the oxygenation instead of the carboxylation. The reason this is a problem is because the plant has to undergo a wasteful side reaction, making this energetically unfavorable, by losing around 30% of the plants ATP in that step. When Rubisco binds oxygen instead, crop yield becomes lower, this is because it only makes half the amount of 3-Phosphoglycerate. This limits how many times a plant can undergo the Calvin Cycle to make sugar. When temperatures begin to increase it is even more of an inconvenience and much more difficult for a plant to fix this problem. If we can fix kinetically competitive side reaction, Rubisco can not only be more successful with photosynthesis, but extremely successful with changing crop growth and quantity.
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
The major problem researchers have been working to change with Rubisco is the oxygenation instead of the carboxylation. The reason this is a problem is because the plant has to fix this, making this issue energetically unfavorable, by losing around 30% of the plants ATP in that step. When Rubisco binds oxygen instead, crop yield becomes lower, this is because it only makes half the product amount of 3-Phosphoglycerate. This limits how many times a plant can undergo the Calvin Cycle to make sugar. When temperatures begin to increase it is even more of an inconvenience and much more difficult for a plant to fix this problem. If we can fix this issue, Rubisco can not only be more successful with photosynthesis, but extremely successful with changing crop growth and quantity.
+
“In recent times, major advances in Rubisco engineering have been achieved through improvement of our knowledge of Rubisco synthesis and assembly, and identifying amino acid catalytic switches in the L-subunit responsible for improvements in catalysis. in crops such as rice will require further advances in chloroplast bioengineering and Rubisco biogenesis.”Carefully modifying genes in specific major functioning subunits can help change Rubisco to adjust the Calvin cycle and save ATP. This all starts in the chloroplasts, where Rubisco works. Improvements can also be made in C3 plants as well. They can be engineered to harvest Co2 as well, just like C4 plants. There are also alternative pathways that can be created to avoid oxygenation. <ref name="Sharwood">PMID: 27935049</ref>
“In recent times, major advances in Rubisco engineering have been achieved through improvement of our knowledge of Rubisco synthesis and assembly, and identifying amino acid catalytic switches in the L-subunit responsible for improvements in catalysis. in crops such as rice will require further advances in chloroplast bioengineering and Rubisco biogenesis.”Carefully modifying genes in specific major functioning subunits can help change Rubisco to adjust the Calvin cycle and save ATP. This all starts in the chloroplasts, where Rubisco works. Improvements can also be made in C3 plants as well. They can be engineered to harvest Co2 as well, just like C4 plants. There are also alternative pathways that can be created to avoid oxygenation. <ref name="Sharwood">PMID: 27935049</ref>
== Success of Rubisco ==
== Success of Rubisco ==
-
Success of Rubisco can be measured by the Michaelis constant of O2 and of Co2. RCA plays an important part in maintaining Rubisco activity. RCA is a nuclear gene that encodes a chloroplast protein. It is a member of the AAA(+) protein superfamily. Without RCA, plants would need a high amount of CO2 because Rubisco activity wouldn’t be maintained. Sugar phosphate molecules inhibit catalysis and prevent carbamylation. RCA removes these sugar phosphate molecules. “In most plants, RCA comprises two isoforms, an α isoform equipped with a C-terminal extension containing two cysteine residues that confer redox regulation and a shorter b isoform (Carmo-Silva et al., 2015). In Arabidopsis, the b isoform does not contain the redoxsensitive cysteine residues and is less sensitive to ADP inhibition (Carmo-Silva & Salvucci, 2013). However, the b form of tobacco RCA is sensitive to ADP inhibition, which may be explained by the absence of the α isoform (Carmo-Silva & Salvucci, 2013).” <ref name="Sharwood">PMID: 27935049</ref>
+
RCA plays an important part in maintaining Rubisco activity. RCA is a nuclear gene that encodes a chloroplast protein. It is a member of the AAA(+) protein superfamily. Without RCA, plants would need a high amount of CO2 because Rubisco activity wouldn’t be maintained. Sugar phosphate molecules inhibit catalysis and prevent carbamylation. RCA removes these sugar phosphate molecules. “In most plants, RCA comprises two isoforms, an α isoform equipped with a C-terminal extension containing two cysteine residues that confer redox regulation and a shorter b isoform (Carmo-Silva et al., 2015). In Arabidopsis, the b isoform does not contain the redoxsensitive cysteine residues and is less sensitive to ADP inhibition (Carmo-Silva & Salvucci, 2013). However, the b form of tobacco RCA is sensitive to ADP inhibition, which may be explained by the absence of the α isoform (Carmo-Silva & Salvucci, 2013).” <ref name="Sharwood">PMID: 27935049</ref>
-
In conclusion, there are other factors in plants that can be modified to generate more crop growth. However, being able to manipulate Rubisco is the most energetically effective and can make the most impact on crop output.
+

Revision as of 21:45, 1 May 2019

==Your Heading Here (maybe something like 'Structure')== Modifying Rubisco to Improve Crop Output

Caption for this structure

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

References

  1. Hanson, R. M., Prilusky, J., Renjian, Z., Nakane, T. and Sussman, J. L. (2013), JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia. Isr. J. Chem., 53:207-216. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300024
  2. Herraez A. Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006 Jul;34(4):255-61. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644. PMID:21638687 doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644
  3. 3.0 3.1 Sharwood RE. Engineering chloroplasts to improve Rubisco catalysis: prospects for translating improvements into food and fiber crops. New Phytol. 2017 Jan;213(2):494-510. doi: 10.1111/nph.14351. Epub 2016 Dec 9. PMID:27935049 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14351

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Emily T. Frankenreiter, Michal Harel

Personal tools