User:Christopher Shelby/Sandbox 1
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Another important role NC playes in reverse transcription is complementary DNA elongation. After ssDNA is synthesized, minus-strand transfer is required for extension of the short strand to get the full-length DNA copy of gRNA. This is facilitated by the complementary annealing to the repeat region (R-region). This R region is composed of the transactivation response element (TAR) and poly A. The donar RNA is then degraded and the ssDNA is then translocated to the acceptor RNA. NC role in minus strand transfer is based on its chaperone activity. NC facilitates annealing of the complimentary minus strand ssDNA ( (-) ssDNA ) to the acceptor RNA and increases its rate of binding by ~3000 fold (Levin , Mithun, Mascarenhas, & Musier-Forsyth, 2010). There are two mechanisms for the NC facilitated annealing: kissing loop and zipper. One is the TAR RNA and TAR DNA forming an initial kissing loop in the apical loops. In an experiment where the DNA version of TAR RNA and complementary TAR DNA was complexed with NC, the kissing loop was the slower and minor pathway. Kissing loop was observed in 27-nt mini TAR tRNA and DNA hairpins in the absence of NC. For full length 59-nt TAR tRNA and DNA was used, the addition of NC complete switched the annealing pathway from kissing loop to zipper. Because TAR is a very stable, the <scene name='81/814018/Nc_dna_interaction_2/1'> helix destabilizing property of NC </scene> is necessary for annealing. With FRET, NC was shown to shift equilibrium from the closed conformation of TAR a predominantly open conformation. NC also protected TAR (-) ssDNA from self-priming via nonspecific folding back on itself due to binding of the zinc fingers. If TAR RNA is also present, NC ensures that the more thermodynamically stable bp of TAR DNA with TAR RNA. | Another important role NC playes in reverse transcription is complementary DNA elongation. After ssDNA is synthesized, minus-strand transfer is required for extension of the short strand to get the full-length DNA copy of gRNA. This is facilitated by the complementary annealing to the repeat region (R-region). This R region is composed of the transactivation response element (TAR) and poly A. The donar RNA is then degraded and the ssDNA is then translocated to the acceptor RNA. NC role in minus strand transfer is based on its chaperone activity. NC facilitates annealing of the complimentary minus strand ssDNA ( (-) ssDNA ) to the acceptor RNA and increases its rate of binding by ~3000 fold (Levin , Mithun, Mascarenhas, & Musier-Forsyth, 2010). There are two mechanisms for the NC facilitated annealing: kissing loop and zipper. One is the TAR RNA and TAR DNA forming an initial kissing loop in the apical loops. In an experiment where the DNA version of TAR RNA and complementary TAR DNA was complexed with NC, the kissing loop was the slower and minor pathway. Kissing loop was observed in 27-nt mini TAR tRNA and DNA hairpins in the absence of NC. For full length 59-nt TAR tRNA and DNA was used, the addition of NC complete switched the annealing pathway from kissing loop to zipper. Because TAR is a very stable, the <scene name='81/814018/Nc_dna_interaction_2/1'> helix destabilizing property of NC </scene> is necessary for annealing. With FRET, NC was shown to shift equilibrium from the closed conformation of TAR a predominantly open conformation. NC also protected TAR (-) ssDNA from self-priming via nonspecific folding back on itself due to binding of the zinc fingers. If TAR RNA is also present, NC ensures that the more thermodynamically stable bp of TAR DNA with TAR RNA. | ||
| - | An interesting property necessary for NC chaperone activity is the quick association and dissociation. In order to facilitate nuclear acid stand annealing NC has to have rapid binding/unbinding kinetics which is due in large part to the zinc fingers. This NC rapid dissociation kinetics may also play an important role in regulating the timing of reverse transcription. At low Gag concentration, the dissociation kinetics of Gag matches that of mature NC. However, at higher concentrations (roughly 0.23 μM), the rate of Gag dissociation from ssRNA or ssDNA was greatly reduced relative to mature NC, and at a concentration of 0.46 μM, the (-) DNA transfer system stopped (Levin , Mithun, Mascarenhas, & Musier-Forsyth, 2010). It believed that the higher Gag concentration facilitates the oligomerization of Gag along the gRNA and blocks the binding of RT, inhibiting reverse transcription. Gag’s reduced dissociation kinetics also prevented the extended binding of tRNA to the PBS site after initial kissing loop formation. Mature NC and unspliced Gag, demonstrates different dissociation kinetics and thereby exhibited different chaperone activities (Levin , Mithun, Mascarenhas, & Musier-Forsyth, 2010) . | + | An interesting property necessary for NC chaperone activity is the quick association and dissociation. In order to facilitate nuclear acid stand annealing NC has to have rapid binding/unbinding kinetics which is due in large part to the zinc fingers. This NC rapid dissociation kinetics may also play an important role in regulating the timing of reverse transcription. At low Gag concentration, the dissociation kinetics of Gag matches that of mature NC. However, at higher concentrations (roughly 0.23 μM), the rate of Gag dissociation from ssRNA or ssDNA was greatly reduced relative to mature NC, and at a concentration of 0.46 μM, the (-) DNA transfer system stopped (Levin , Mithun, Mascarenhas, & Musier-Forsyth, 2010). It is believed that the higher Gag concentration facilitates the oligomerization of Gag along the gRNA and blocks the binding of RT, inhibiting reverse transcription. Gag’s reduced dissociation kinetics also prevented the extended binding of tRNA to the PBS site after initial kissing loop formation. Mature NC and unspliced Gag, demonstrates different dissociation kinetics and thereby exhibited different chaperone activities (Levin , Mithun, Mascarenhas, & Musier-Forsyth, 2010) . |
Revision as of 15:09, 3 May 2019
| |||||||||||
