Sandbox Reserved 1106
From Proteopedia
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==== Primary Structure ==== | ==== Primary Structure ==== | ||
- | The Ago1 protein has the same 4 primary domains as all argonaute proteins (N, PAZ, Mid, PIWI, described in the page [[Argonaute]]) and the two linker regions L1 (also called DUF1785 domain) and L2. In fact, there are 84% of similitudes between the primary sequence of hAgo1 and that of hAgo2. The main structural difference between the two similar proteins is that the N domain of AGO1 interacts with the L1, L2 and PIWI domains via residues 18-48 and 138-173. | + | The Ago1 protein has the same 4 primary domains as all argonaute proteins (N, PAZ, Mid, PIWI, described in the page [[Argonaute]]) and the two linker regions L1 (also called DUF1785 domain) and L2. In fact, there are 84% of similitudes between the primary sequence of hAgo1 and that of hAgo2. The main structural difference between the two similar proteins is that the N domain of AGO1 interacts with the L1, L2 and PIWI domains via residues 18-48 and 138-173. <ref name="source1">Christopher R. Faehnle, et al. (2013, May). ''The making of a Slicer: Activation of Human Argonaute-1''. Cell Reports. [https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(13)00266-0?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2211124713002660%3Fshowall%3Dtrue] </ref> |
+ | |||
Besides, Argonaute 1 can be found in a lot of phylogenetic groups, with different structure. For example, in the plant ''Brachypodium distachyon'', where 10 argonautes proteins have been discovered, BdAGO1 lacks the N and Mid domains. This particularity explains the small size of this protein with only 624 residues. Moreover, BdAGO1 is functionally related to Ago1 as both proteins lack endonuclease activity. Indeed, the catalytic tetrad of its PIWI domain is disabled through the absence of the last D/H residue in the domain. | Besides, Argonaute 1 can be found in a lot of phylogenetic groups, with different structure. For example, in the plant ''Brachypodium distachyon'', where 10 argonautes proteins have been discovered, BdAGO1 lacks the N and Mid domains. This particularity explains the small size of this protein with only 624 residues. Moreover, BdAGO1 is functionally related to Ago1 as both proteins lack endonuclease activity. Indeed, the catalytic tetrad of its PIWI domain is disabled through the absence of the last D/H residue in the domain. | ||
- | However, the AtAGO1 (from ''Arabidopsis thaliana''), which can be found in the nucleus and the cytoplasm of the plant, includes a Mid domain and has an homologous conformation to BdAO9, BdAGO11, BdAGO12, BdAGO15, and BdAGO16. On the other hand, BdAGO1 has AtAGO4 as its closest homolog (like BaAGO2, BdAGO3 and BdAGO4), even if the AtAGO4 possess a Mid Domain. <ref name=" | + | However, the AtAGO1 (from ''Arabidopsis thaliana''), which can be found in the nucleus and the cytoplasm of the plant, includes a Mid domain and has an homologous conformation to BdAO9, BdAGO11, BdAGO12, BdAGO15, and BdAGO16. On the other hand, BdAGO1 has AtAGO4 as its closest homolog (like BaAGO2, BdAGO3 and BdAGO4), even if the AtAGO4 possess a Mid Domain. <ref name="source2"> Ena Secic, et al. (2019, October). ''Further Elucidation of the argonaute and dicer protein families in the model grass species Brachypodium distachyon''. Frontiers in Plant Science. [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01332/full]</ref> |
==== Proteins Associating with Ago1 ==== | ==== Proteins Associating with Ago1 ==== | ||
- | The Argonaute 1 protein can be associated with others molecular components of the cell. In fact, proteomic analysis has demonstrated that RNase III Dicer binds hAgo1 through the PIWI domain (see page on argonaute) and also, at least, four other proteins in specific association with hAgo1: | + | The Argonaute 1 protein can be associated with others molecular components of the cell. In fact, proteomic analysis has demonstrated that RNase III Dicer binds hAgo1 through the PIWI domain (see page on argonaute) and also, at least, four other proteins in specific association with hAgo1: <ref name="source2">Gunter Meister, et al. (2005, December). ''Identification of Novel Argonaute-Associated Proteins''. Current Biology, 2149-2155. [https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(05)01301-1?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0960982205013011%3Fshowall%3Dtrue]</ref> |
• TNRC6B isoform 1 / KIAA1093 (175kDa) which has RRM motif at C-term to recognize RNA, and also GW repeats (trinucleotide motifs) | • TNRC6B isoform 1 / KIAA1093 (175kDa) which has RRM motif at C-term to recognize RNA, and also GW repeats (trinucleotide motifs) | ||
Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
Then, from a nucleotide point of view, hAgo1 shows 6 RNA-specific interactions with ribose 2’OH of let-7 (U1, G2, G4, G5, A7 and A8). There are either direct or water-mediated through the side- or main- chain atoms of hAgo1 like for hAgo2/miR20a. However, there is one interaction presents in hAgo2/miR20a that is missing in hAgo1/let-7 ; it is the one with U6 since this base is slightly modified because of the shift of α7 in the L2 toward the N domain. Furthermore, the first adenine base has a syn conformation around the glycosidic bond and the last two bases are piled in the PAZ domain | Then, from a nucleotide point of view, hAgo1 shows 6 RNA-specific interactions with ribose 2’OH of let-7 (U1, G2, G4, G5, A7 and A8). There are either direct or water-mediated through the side- or main- chain atoms of hAgo1 like for hAgo2/miR20a. However, there is one interaction presents in hAgo2/miR20a that is missing in hAgo1/let-7 ; it is the one with U6 since this base is slightly modified because of the shift of α7 in the L2 toward the N domain. Furthermore, the first adenine base has a syn conformation around the glycosidic bond and the last two bases are piled in the PAZ domain | ||
- | Finally, one of the most important aspect is the non-5’ phosphorylated strand ; indeed the U1 base of let-7 and the 5’P of hAgo1 are interacted with protein residues of the Mid and PIWI domains which avoid an interaction between them, preventing a phosphorylation which is important for accurate slicing activity. | + | Finally, one of the most important aspect is the non-5’ phosphorylated strand ; indeed the U1 base of let-7 and the 5’P of hAgo1 are interacted with protein residues of the Mid and PIWI domains which avoid an interaction between them, preventing a phosphorylation which is important for accurate slicing activity. <ref name="source1"></ref> |
''Knowing that the nine first 9 nucleotids of let-7 are: 5’AAUAUUAAA3’.'' | ''Knowing that the nine first 9 nucleotids of let-7 are: 5’AAUAUUAAA3’.'' | ||
Line 55: | Line 56: | ||
==== Restoration of slicing activity ==== | ==== Restoration of slicing activity ==== | ||
- | Among the four human Argonaute proteins, only hAGO2 is an active slicer. A conserved catalytic triad within the PIWI domain in hAGO2 is required for its slicing activity and hAGO1 has an arginine in place of the active site histidine in the DEDH tetrad. Yet, restoring an intact catalytic DEDH tetrad with a R805H mutation is not enough to activate slicing in hAGO1. Therefore, it appears more distant regions of the enzyme are determinant for slicer activity. Domain-swapping experiments revealed that the substitution of the hAGO1 and hAGO2 PIWI domain activates hAGO1 while hAGO2 slicing activity is being removed; providing new evidence that other factors, in addition to the incomplete DEDH tetrad, are responsible for the slicer defect in hAGO1. Indeed, an additional mutation of L674F on the PIWI loop 3 adjacent to the active site of hAGO1 leads to an active slicer with level comparable to that of the hAGO2 PIWI domain swap. Intriguingly, the elements that make hAGO1 an active slicer involve a sophisticated interplay between the active site and more distant regions of the enzyme. | + | Among the four human Argonaute proteins, only hAGO2 is an active slicer. A conserved catalytic triad within the PIWI domain in hAGO2 is required for its slicing activity and hAGO1 has an arginine in place of the active site histidine in the DEDH tetrad. Yet, restoring an intact catalytic DEDH tetrad with a R805H mutation is not enough to activate slicing in hAGO1. Therefore, it appears more distant regions of the enzyme are determinant for slicer activity. Domain-swapping experiments revealed that the substitution of the hAGO1 and hAGO2 PIWI domain activates hAGO1 while hAGO2 slicing activity is being removed; providing new evidence that other factors, in addition to the incomplete DEDH tetrad, are responsible for the slicer defect in hAGO1. Indeed, an additional mutation of L674F on the PIWI loop 3 adjacent to the active site of hAGO1 leads to an active slicer with level comparable to that of the hAGO2 PIWI domain swap. Intriguingly, the elements that make hAGO1 an active slicer involve a sophisticated interplay between the active site and more distant regions of the enzyme. <ref name="source1"></ref> |
== Function == | == Function == |
Revision as of 14:39, 17 January 2020
This Sandbox is Reserved from 25/11/2019, through 30/9/2020 for use in the course "Structural Biology" taught by Bruno Kieffer at the University of Strasbourg, ESBS. This reservation includes Sandbox Reserved 1091 through Sandbox Reserved 1115. |
To get started:
More help: Help:Editing |
Argonaute 1 (PDB 4KXT)
|
References
[1] Gunter Meister, et al. (2005, December). Identification of Novel Argonaute-Associated Proteins. Current Biology, 2149-2155. [3]
[2] Bethany A Jawosky et al. (2006, September). Involvement of AGO1 and AGO2 in mammalian transcriptional silencing. Nature Structural and Molecular biology, 787-792.[4]
[3] Ligang Wu, et al. (2008, September). Importance of translation and Nonnucleolytic Ago Proteins for On- Target RNA Interference. Current Biology, 1327-1332.[5]
[4] Christopher R. Faehnle, et al. (2013, May). The making of a Slicer: Activation of Human Argonaute-1. Cell Reports. [6]
[5] Daniel Völler, et al. (2016, August). Argonaute family protein expression in normal tissue and cancer entities. Plos one.[7]
[6] Schalk C. et al. (2017, February). Small RNA-mediated repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by the DNA damagebinding protein 2 and Argonaute 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. (PNAS) USA 114, E2965–E2974.[8]
[7] Elad Elkayam, et al. (2017, August). Multivalent recruitment of human argonaute by GW182. Molecular Cell, 646-658. [9]
[8] Lidiya Lisitskaya, et al. (2018). DNA Interference and beyond : Structure and Functions of Prokaryotic Argonaute Proteins. Nature Communications.[10]
[9] Ena Secic, et al. (2019, October). Further Elucidation of the argonaute and dicer protein families in the model grass species Brachypodium distachyon. Frontiers in Plant Science.[11]
[10] ZhenLong Ye, et al. (2015, July). Argonaute 2: A Novel Rising Star in Cancer Research. Journal of Cancer, 877-882. [12]
JSmol in Proteopedia [3]
- ↑ Christopher R. Faehnle, et al. (2013, May). The making of a Slicer: Activation of Human Argonaute-1. Cell Reports. [1]
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Ena Secic, et al. (2019, October). Further Elucidation of the argonaute and dicer protein families in the model grass species Brachypodium distachyon. Frontiers in Plant Science. [2]
- ↑ Hanson, R. M., Prilusky, J., Renjian, Z., Nakane, T. and Sussman, J. L. (2013), JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia. Isr. J. Chem., 53:207-216. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300024