Sandbox Reserved 1643
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
												
			
			| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| <font color='#cc80ff'>serine, </font><font color='#c88033'>histidine</font> | <font color='#cc80ff'>serine, </font><font color='#c88033'>histidine</font> | ||
| - | <scene name='86/868176/Petase_catalytictriad_ba1/1'>serine, histidine</scene> | ||
| + | <scene name='86/868176/Petase_catalytictriad_ba1/1'>serine, a histidine and an aspartate</scene> | ||
| - | The PETase discovered in I. sakaiensis is a cutinase-like serine hydrolase. As in every cutinase, the catalytic site is made of a serine, a histidine and an aspartate. Altogether, they are called the catalytic triad. In PETase, these three amino acids are S133, H210 and D179 <ref name="structure">DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.005</ref>. The PETase follows the canonical serine hydrolase catalytic mechanism when PET binds to the enzyme. The serine performs a nucleophilic attack on the substrate, then the basic amino acid histidine polarizes the serine and the acidic amino acid aspartate stabilizes the histidine <ref name="current and futur perspectives">DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2020.571265</ref>. The reaction mechanism takes place in two steps, acylation and deacylation. Acylation consists of proton transfer from Ser133 to His210 and a nucleophilic attack by Ser133 on the substrate, leading to a tetrahedral transition state. Deacylation consists of deprotonation of a water molecule by His210, resulting in a hydroxide attacking the acylated Ser133 intermediate and breaking its bond to the substrate. His210 transfers the water’s proton to Ser133, with formation of MHET and enzyme regeneration. [???] | + | |
| + | The PETase discovered in I. sakaiensis is a cutinase-like serine hydrolase. As in every cutinase, the catalytic site is made of <scene name='86/868176/Petase_catalytictriad_ba1/1'>a serine, a histidine and an aspartate</scene>. Altogether, they are called the catalytic triad. In PETase, these three amino acids are S133, H210 and D179 <ref name="structure">DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.005</ref>. The PETase follows the canonical serine hydrolase catalytic mechanism when PET binds to the enzyme. The serine performs a nucleophilic attack on the substrate, then the basic amino acid histidine polarizes the serine and the acidic amino acid aspartate stabilizes the histidine <ref name="current and futur perspectives">DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2020.571265</ref>. The reaction mechanism takes place in two steps, acylation and deacylation. Acylation consists of proton transfer from Ser133 to His210 and a nucleophilic attack by Ser133 on the substrate, leading to a tetrahedral transition state. Deacylation consists of deprotonation of a water molecule by His210, resulting in a hydroxide attacking the acylated Ser133 intermediate and breaking its bond to the substrate. His210 transfers the water’s proton to Ser133, with formation of MHET and enzyme regeneration. [???] | ||
| Questions remain regarding the mobility of certain residues during the catalytic cycle. | Questions remain regarding the mobility of certain residues during the catalytic cycle. | ||
Revision as of 22:16, 18 January 2022
| This Sandbox is Reserved from 26/11/2020, through 26/11/2021 for use in the course "Structural Biology" taught by Bruno Kieffer at the University of Strasbourg, ESBS. This reservation includes Sandbox Reserved 1643 through Sandbox Reserved 1664. | 
| To get started: 
 More help: Help:Editing | 
PET Hydrolase
| 
 | |||||||||||
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Yoshida S, Hiraga K, Takehana T, Taniguchi I, Yamaji H, Maeda Y, Toyohara K, Miyamoto K, Kimura Y, Oda K. A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science. 2016 Mar 11;351(6278):1196-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aad6359. PMID:26965627 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6359
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Danso D, Schmeisser C, Chow J, Zimmermann W, Wei R, Leggewie C, Li X, Hazen T, Streit WR. New Insights into the Function and Global Distribution of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)-Degrading Bacteria and Enzymes in Marine and Terrestrial Metagenomes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Apr 2;84(8). pii: AEM.02773-17. doi:, 10.1128/AEM.02773-17. Print 2018 Apr 15. PMID:29427431 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02773-17
- ↑ Panda T, Gowrishankar BS. Production and applications of esterases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005 Apr;67(2):160-9. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1840-y. , Epub 2005 Jan 4. PMID:15630579 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1840-y
- ↑ P. Dockrill, « Scientists Have Accidentally Created a Mutant Enzyme That Eats Plastic Waste », ScienceAlert. https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-accidentally-engineered-mutant-enzyme-eats-through-plastic-pet-petase-pollution Retrieved 2021-01-11.
- ↑ Kim JW, Park SB, Tran QG, Cho DH, Choi DY, Lee YJ, Kim HS. Functional expression of polyethylene terephthalate-degrading enzyme (PETase) in green microalgae. Microb Cell Fact. 2020 Apr 28;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01355-8. PMID:32345276 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01355-8
- ↑ Austin HP, Allen MD, Donohoe BS, Rorrer NA, Kearns FL, Silveira RL, Pollard BC, Dominick G, Duman R, El Omari K, Mykhaylyk V, Wagner A, Michener WE, Amore A, Skaf MS, Crowley MF, Thorne AW, Johnson CW, Woodcock HL, McGeehan JE, Beckham GT. Characterization and engineering of a plastic-degrading aromatic polyesterase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 17. pii: 1718804115. doi:, 10.1073/pnas.1718804115. PMID:29666242 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718804115
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 Fecker T, Galaz-Davison P, Engelberger F, Narui Y, Sotomayor M, Parra LP, Ramirez-Sarmiento CA. Active Site Flexibility as a Hallmark for Efficient PET Degradation by I. sakaiensis PETase. Biophys J. 2018 Mar 27;114(6):1302-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.005. PMID:29590588 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.005
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 Carr CM, Clarke DJ, Dobson ADW. Microbial Polyethylene Terephthalate Hydrolases: Current and Future Perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2020 Nov 11;11:571265. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.571265., eCollection 2020. PMID:33262744 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.571265
