Sandbox Reserved 1718
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Significance of Human Itch GPCR == | == Significance of Human Itch GPCR == | ||
- | The | + | The determination of the first structures of a ligand-activated G protein-coupled receptor was achieved by Robert J. Lefkowitz and Brian K. Kobilka which won them the 2012 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. They also successfully captured images of the first activated G protein-coupled receptor in complex with a G protein. *** add citation |
- | + | ||
== Related Enzymes == | == Related Enzymes == | ||
Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
The MRGPRX2 receptor consists of 7 transmembrane helices, 3 intracellular loops, and 3 extracellular loops. The N-terminus, which is in the extracellular domain, is involved in ligand binding to the receptor. The intracellular domain consists of helix VII and a specific c-terminal sequence which binds the g-protein and promotes downstream signaling. The MRGPRX4 receptor consists of the same key structures and interacts with ligands and g-proteins in the same structural regions. | The MRGPRX2 receptor consists of 7 transmembrane helices, 3 intracellular loops, and 3 extracellular loops. The N-terminus, which is in the extracellular domain, is involved in ligand binding to the receptor. The intracellular domain consists of helix VII and a specific c-terminal sequence which binds the g-protein and promotes downstream signaling. The MRGPRX4 receptor consists of the same key structures and interacts with ligands and g-proteins in the same structural regions. | ||
+ | |||
When comparing the structures of MRGPRX2 and MRGPRX4, they are very similar in their intracellular domains. However, they differ in their extracellular domains which highlight key differences in the functions of the two receptors. First, the extracellular tip of transmembrane helix 3 (TM3) is displaced 5.2 Å inward in the MRGPRX4 structure. This results in a more compact binding site. In addition, because of the displacement of TM3, extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) shifts into the orthosteric binding pocket in between TM3 and TM6 affecting the binding pocket of MRGPRX4, which will be discussed later. | When comparing the structures of MRGPRX2 and MRGPRX4, they are very similar in their intracellular domains. However, they differ in their extracellular domains which highlight key differences in the functions of the two receptors. First, the extracellular tip of transmembrane helix 3 (TM3) is displaced 5.2 Å inward in the MRGPRX4 structure. This results in a more compact binding site. In addition, because of the displacement of TM3, extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) shifts into the orthosteric binding pocket in between TM3 and TM6 affecting the binding pocket of MRGPRX4, which will be discussed later. | ||
== Active Site == | == Active Site == | ||
- | The active site of MRGPRX2 is comprised of two binding sub pockets. Sub pocket 1 is formed by TM3, TM6, and ECL2. This sub pocket is both small and deep which results in the binding of only a single amino acid residue, namely arginine or sometimes lysine. The binding is mediated by two key residues on the MRGPRX2 protein within the binding site, glutamic acid 164 (E164) and aspartic acid (D184). The strong charge interactions of these two residues create a highly negatively charged electrostatic interaction within this sub pocket. | + | The active site of MRGPRX2 is comprised of two binding sub pockets. Sub pocket 1 is formed by TM3, TM6, and ECL2. This sub pocket is both small and deep which results in the binding of only a single amino acid residue, namely arginine or sometimes lysine. The binding is mediated by two key residues on the MRGPRX2 protein within the binding site, glutamic acid 164 (E164) and aspartic acid (D184). The strong charge interactions of these two residues create a highly negatively charged electrostatic interaction within this sub-pocket. |
Sub pocket 2 is formed by TM1, TM2, TM6, and TM7. This binding sub pocket is much more shallow and allows for the binding of larger structures. The key residues involved are tryptophan 243 (W243) and phenylalanine 170 (F170) which allow for binding through hydrophobic interactions. The hydrophobicity of this binding pocket accounts for the large electrostatic difference observed between the two sub pockets. | Sub pocket 2 is formed by TM1, TM2, TM6, and TM7. This binding sub pocket is much more shallow and allows for the binding of larger structures. The key residues involved are tryptophan 243 (W243) and phenylalanine 170 (F170) which allow for binding through hydrophobic interactions. The hydrophobicity of this binding pocket accounts for the large electrostatic difference observed between the two sub pockets. | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
== Substrates/Ligands == | == Substrates/Ligands == | ||
- | + | Some ligands that bind to MRGPRX2 and X4 are discussed below. There are many more ligands that can bind to these receptors, especially MRGPRX2 because of the electrostatic surface of its binding pocket. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | === (R)-zinc-3573 === | |
+ | |||
+ | (R)-zinc-3573 is an agonist that binds to MRGPRX2 when it is associated with a G<sub>i</sub> or G<sub>q</sub> protein with no change in molecular interactions. This agonist is a small cationic molecule that forms largely ionic interactions with the negatively-charged sub-pocket 1 and has no interactions with sub-pocket 2. (R)-zinc-3573 forms hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions with D184 and E164 of sub-pocket 1. In experimental research, this agonist was manufactured to further research the characteristics of mast cells including mast cell proliferation, receptor expression, mediator release and inhibition, and signaling. This agonist was created to stimulate LAD2 mast cell degranulation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === C48/80 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | C48/80 is a peptide agonist that can bind to MRGPRX2 when it is associated with a G<sub>i</sub> or G<sub>q</sub> protein. The binding interactions of C48/80 with G<sub>i</sub> and G<sub>q</sub> do not change, but their binding efficacies are different. The structure of the peptide itself consists of three phenethylamine groups that are arranged in a Y shape with a semicircular arrangement. Upon its binding, the D184 and E164 within sub-pocket 1 interact only with the central phenethylamine ring, forming hydrogen bonds and charge-charge interactions. The central phenethylamine ring is inserted into the binding pocket at a depth of 5.6 A. The binding of this ligand causes the separation of all of the ECLs from the receptor's N-terminus. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Cortistatin-14 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cortistatin-14 is an endogenous peptide agonist which interacts with MRGPRX2 the same way whether it is coupled to G<sub>i</sub> or G<sub>q</sub> proteins. This is a fairly large ligand and it binds near the ECLs in the shallow binding pocket of the receptor, which reduces its local resolution. Specifically, a basic lysine residue (L3) on Cortistatin-14 will bind in the negatively charged sub-pocket 1 and forms strong charge interactions with D184 and E164. This structure will bind to both binding pockets, so the remaining residues of Cortistatin-14 will extend over to sub-pocket 2 and bind through hydrophobic interactions. | ||
== Mechanism == | == Mechanism == | ||
- | + | As mentioned above, the ligands for this g-coupled receptor can vary, but they often interact with the binding pockets through charge interactions, hydrogen bonding, or hydrophobic interactions. When considering agonistic interactions, once bound to the receptor, the ligand triggers a conformational change in the C-terminus of the receptor. This conformational change results in the activation of the coupled G protein. This alpha subunit of this G protein will then exchange a GDP for GTP which will allow the α subunit to dissociate from the βγ dimer and bind to downstream target proteins to allow the signaling pathway to continue. However, when considering the activity of the G proteins, it is important to remember that G<sub>q</sub> proteins are stimulatory and will drive forward the signaling pathway, while G<sub>i</sub> proteins are inhibitory and will stop signaling pathways. G<sub>q</sub> proteins are seen in signaling pathways that rely on phospholipase C enzymes, while G<sub>i</sub> proteins regulate pathways that involve adenylate cyclase. GPCR pathways can be regulated by a variety of modulators. For example, there are many known agonists, inverse agonists, and antagonists that are capable of binding to the human itch GPCRs. | |
- | signaling | + | |
- | + | ||
= Relevance = | = Relevance = | ||
Line 71: | Line 79: | ||
== Clinical Relevance == | == Clinical Relevance == | ||
- | drug hypersensitivity | + | Most often MRGPRs, specifically MRGPRX2, have been studied in response to anaphylactic reactions. In an article written by Porebski et al., they focused on IgE-mediated and MRGPRX2-mediated anaphylactic reactions. In which they looked at the characteristics of the two pathways and how mutations to the receptors affected the responses generated. They found that MRGPRX2-mediated responses occur more quickly that IgE-mediated responses, but the responses tended to be more transient. They also demonstrated that common commercial drugs, like icatibant and cetrorelix, activate mast cells through the MRGPRX2 pathway and that neuromuscular blocking agents also activated responses through MRGPRX2. |
+ | |||
+ | Porebski et al. also determined many mutations that affect the actions of MRGPRX2. For example, a single residue mutation in sub-pocket 1 (Glu164Arg) prevented interactions between the receptor and ligands like C48/80. In addition, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been linked to many variations of MRGPRX2 which predispose patients to hyperactivation of the receptors. Two of the most common SNPs are Asn62Thr which affects the cytoplasmic domain and Asn16His which affects the extracellular domain. Ultimately, there have only been 5 SNPs detected that can potentially affect the extracellular domains and binding pockets of the receptors: Asn16His, Pro6Thr, Gly165Glu, Asp252Tyr, and His259Tyr. These mutations can potentially protect patients from drug-induced mast cell degranulation and hypersensitivity reactions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, even within the MRGPRX2-mediated pathway reactions can still differ in frequency which leads to many theoretical possibilities which need further exploration. Notably, in the same patients, it has been shown that reactions can occur through both pathways and that both mechanisms may be responsible for cross-reactivity between drugs. If the findings of Porebski et al. are accurate it could point to drugs interacting with MRGPRX2 on different active sites within the receptor or that the intracellular signaling pathways triggered by the binding of varying drugs have different responses thus producing different overall reactions. | ||
+ | |||
This is a sample scene created with SAT to <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/1">color</scene> by Group, and another to make <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/2">a transparent representation</scene> of the protein. You can make your own scenes on SAT starting from scratch or loading and editing one of these sample scenes. | This is a sample scene created with SAT to <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/1">color</scene> by Group, and another to make <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/2">a transparent representation</scene> of the protein. You can make your own scenes on SAT starting from scratch or loading and editing one of these sample scenes. |
Revision as of 02:36, 29 March 2022
This Sandbox is Reserved from February 28 through September 1, 2022 for use in the course CH462 Biochemistry II taught by R. Jeremy Johnson at the Butler University, Indianapolis, USA. This reservation includes Sandbox Reserved 1700 through Sandbox Reserved 1729. |
To get started:
More help: Help:Editing |
Human Itch G-Protein Coupled Receptor
|
article about drug hypersensitivity [5]
References
- ↑ Davidson S, Giesler GJ. The multiple pathways for itch and their interactions with pain. Trends Neurosci. 2010 Dec;33(12):550-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.09.002. Epub, 2010 Nov 5. PMID:21056479 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2010.09.002
- ↑ Edward Zhou X, Melcher K, Eric Xu H. Structural biology of G protein-coupled receptor signaling complexes. Protein Sci. 2019 Mar;28(3):487-501. doi: 10.1002/pro.3526. Epub 2018 Dec 13. PMID:30311978 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.3526
- ↑ Edward Zhou X, Melcher K, Eric Xu H. Structural biology of G protein-coupled receptor signaling complexes. Protein Sci. 2019 Mar;28(3):487-501. doi: 10.1002/pro.3526. Epub 2018 Dec 13. PMID:30311978 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.3526
- ↑ Kamato D, Thach L, Bernard R, Chan V, Zheng W, Kaur H, Brimble M, Osman N, Little PJ. Structure, Function, Pharmacology, and Therapeutic Potential of the G Protein, Galpha/q,11. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Mar 24;2:14. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2015.00014. eCollection, 2015. PMID:26664886 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2015.00014
- ↑ Porebski G, Kwiecien K, Pawica M, Kwitniewski M. Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptor-X2 (MRGPRX2) in Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. Front Immunol. 2018 Dec 20;9:3027. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03027. eCollection, 2018. PMID:30619367 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03027