Journal:MicroPubl Biol:000763
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)

Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
To address these issues, we present an <scene name='95/956393/Cv/5'>alternative quaternary structural model for dimerization</scene> of IRE1 luminal domain. In this model, the luminal domain dimer has a side-by-side orientation, which is less stable than the previous model and has a shorter distance of 42.8 Å. A corresponding C-terminal domain that matches it, has a N-terminal separation of 41.7 Å, which has been suggested to be the correct dimerization state of the IRE1 C-terminal domain. In our model, the dimer form of the luminal domain is less stable with an interface area of 1130 Å and theoretical interaction and dissociation free energy values of -12.3 and 0.3 kcal/mol, respectively. On the other hand, other quaternary structure of IRE1 is more stable, with an interface area of 1730 Å and theoretical interaction and dissociation free energy values of -15.2 and 7.2 kcal/mol, respectively. The dimer form, however, still has a reasonably large interface area and low dissociation free energy, which means it can easily switch between a monomer and dimer state. Additionally, the luminal-C-terminal domain separation of approximately 40 Å is more likely to stabilize the full IRE1 protein in its functional form. | To address these issues, we present an <scene name='95/956393/Cv/5'>alternative quaternary structural model for dimerization</scene> of IRE1 luminal domain. In this model, the luminal domain dimer has a side-by-side orientation, which is less stable than the previous model and has a shorter distance of 42.8 Å. A corresponding C-terminal domain that matches it, has a N-terminal separation of 41.7 Å, which has been suggested to be the correct dimerization state of the IRE1 C-terminal domain. In our model, the dimer form of the luminal domain is less stable with an interface area of 1130 Å and theoretical interaction and dissociation free energy values of -12.3 and 0.3 kcal/mol, respectively. On the other hand, other quaternary structure of IRE1 is more stable, with an interface area of 1730 Å and theoretical interaction and dissociation free energy values of -15.2 and 7.2 kcal/mol, respectively. The dimer form, however, still has a reasonably large interface area and low dissociation free energy, which means it can easily switch between a monomer and dimer state. Additionally, the luminal-C-terminal domain separation of approximately 40 Å is more likely to stabilize the full IRE1 protein in its functional form. | ||
- | Furthermore, the <scene name='95/956393/Cv/ | + | Furthermore, the <scene name='95/956393/Cv/10'>head-tail dimer is stabilized by enthalpic contributions from 7 hydrogen bonds and 3 salt bridges</scene>. In contrast, the side-by-side dimer is stabilized by entropic forces from 33 hydrogen bonds and 32 salt bridges, giving it a positive interaction free energy. This suggests that the stability of the side-by-side dimer is highly dependent on its immediate environment. The head-tail dimer, on the other hand, is more stable due to enthalpic contributions and requires more energy to switch its dimerization state. The side-by-side dimer is better suited to act as a sensor protein. Overall, our model of the IRE1 luminal dimer is consistent with the potential side-by-side orientation of the cytoplasmic dimer. |
<b>References</b><br> | <b>References</b><br> |
Revision as of 12:50, 19 March 2023
|
This page complements a publication in scientific journals and is one of the Proteopedia's Interactive 3D Complement pages. For aditional details please see I3DC.