User:Nathan Marohn/Sandbox 2
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<scene name='10/1037518/Gip_transmembrane_intrxn/10'>Transmembrane Residue Interactions</scene> | <scene name='10/1037518/Gip_transmembrane_intrxn/10'>Transmembrane Residue Interactions</scene> | ||
<scene name='10/1037518/Gip_transmembrane_intrxn/10'>TextToBeDisplayed</scene> | <scene name='10/1037518/Gip_transmembrane_intrxn/10'>TextToBeDisplayed</scene> | ||
| - | <scene name='10/1040161/Ribbon_test/5'>G-protein - GIPR Interface</scene> | ||
<scene name='10/1040161/Peptide_20/1'>Peptide 20</scene> | <scene name='10/1040161/Peptide_20/1'>Peptide 20</scene> | ||
<scene name='10/1043643/Overview_gip_gip-r/1'>GIP ligand binds to the receptor</scene> | <scene name='10/1043643/Overview_gip_gip-r/1'>GIP ligand binds to the receptor</scene> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 25: | ||
=== Transmembrane Domain === | === Transmembrane Domain === | ||
| + | Y1 on the N-terminal end of the GIP ligand is crucial for ligand binding. Analogs of GIP containing a mutation at residue 1 resulted in no ligand binding. Y1 of GIP forms a hydrogen bond to Q224 on GIP-R, pulling the GIP ligand deep into the transmembrane domain. In addition, Y1 parallel pi-stacks with W296 on GIP-R, further increasing the affinity of the ligand for the receptor. For these reasons, Y1 is conserved in Tirzepatide. | ||
| - | + | A key mutation in Tirzepatide is I7T. The mutated T7 can form a hydrogen bond with R190 of GIP-R, an interaction that was not possible with the natural I7 residue. Due to this hydrogen bonding interaction, the alcohol group on Y1 of the ligand is tilted towards R190 and Q220, mediated by polar water molecules. The additional interactions increase the affinity of Tirzepatide for GIP-R, which induces a greater cellular response than the natural ligand GIP. | |
| - | Specifically, with the GIP ligand, Y1 on the N-term is a crucial residue that helps the ligand bind to the receptor. Y1 hydrogen bonds to Q224 on the receptor allowing for a tight binding deep in the transmembrane. Y1 also has parallel pi-stacking with W296 on the receptor promoting further bonding of the ligand. Analogs of the GIP ligand were made without Y1, and no binding in the receptor occurred, validating the importance of this specific residue. Additionally, another important factor is I7 on the GIP ligand which is mutated in the Tirzepatide ligand. Being hydrophobic, I7 does not hydrogen bond to R190 on the receptor as it does in the Tirzepatide ligand. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Specifically, with the Tirzepatide ligand, Y1 still has the same parallel pi-stacking interaction with W296 of the receptor. Furthermore, as stated above, the seventh residue on the Tirzepatide ligand is mutated to a T7, which induces hydrogen bonding between R190, unlike in the GIP receptor. Due to this hydrogen bonding induction, and with additional water-mediated polarization, the alcohol group on Y1 of the ligand points towards R190 and Q220 causing some hydrophilic interactions. All of these interactions help bind the ligand tightly in the receptor for activation to occur. | ||
=== Extracellular Domain === | === Extracellular Domain === | ||
Revision as of 23:45, 24 April 2024
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIP-R)
| |||||||||||
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Dalle S, Quoyer J, Varin E, Costes S. Roles and regulation of the transcription factor CREB in pancreatic β -cells. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;4(3):187-95. PMID:21488836 doi:10.2174/1874467211104030187
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Sun B, Willard FS, Feng D, Alsina-Fernandez J, Chen Q, Vieth M, Ho JD, Showalter AD, Stutsman C, Ding L, Suter TM, Dunbar JD, Carpenter JW, Mohammed FA, Aihara E, Brown RA, Bueno AB, Emmerson PJ, Moyers JS, Kobilka TS, Coghlan MP, Kobilka BK, Sloop KW. Structural determinants of dual incretin receptor agonism by tirzepatide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 29;119(13):e2116506119. PMID:35333651 doi:10.1073/pnas.2116506119
- ↑ Mayendraraj A, Rosenkilde MM, Gasbjerg LS. GLP-1 and GIP receptor signaling in beta cells interactions and co-stimulation. Peptides. 2022 May;151:170749. PMID:35065096 doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2022.170749
- ↑ Seino Y, Fukushima M, Yabe D. GIP and GLP-1, the two incretin hormones: Similarities and differences. J Diabetes Investig. 2010 Apr 22;1(1-2):8-23. PMID:24843404 doi:10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00022.x
- ↑ Yaqub T, Tikhonova IG, Lättig J, Magnan R, Laval M, Escrieut C, Boulègue C, Hewage C, Fourmy D. Identification of determinants of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor that interact with N-terminal biologically active region of the natural ligand. Mol Pharmacol. 2010 Apr;77(4):547-58. PMID:20061446 doi:10.1124/mol.109.060111
- ↑ Zhao F, Zhou Q, Cong Z, Hang K, Zou X, Zhang C, Chen Y, Dai A, Liang A, Ming Q, Wang M, Chen LN, Xu P, Chang R, Feng W, Xia T, Zhang Y, Wu B, Yang D, Zhao L, Xu HE, Wang MW. Structural insights into multiplexed pharmacological actions of tirzepatide and peptide 20 at the GIP, GLP-1 or glucagon receptors. Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 25;13(1):1057. PMID:35217653 doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28683-0
