User:Nir London/FunHunt
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
(→FunHunt) |
(→FunHunt) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<applet load='1stf_false.pdb' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='this is not how 1stf looks like' /> | <applet load='1stf_false.pdb' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='this is not how 1stf looks like' /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <applet load='1STF_false.pdb' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='Insert caption here' /> | ||
| + | <applet load='1STF_true.pdb' size='300' frame='true' align='left' caption='Insert caption here' /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Quiz== | ||
| + | To the right and left are presented two docking models for the complex of ... One of the models is correct while the other is in-correct, can you tell which is which ? | ||
| + | |||
==FunHunt== | ==FunHunt== | ||
Revision as of 15:34, 14 September 2008
|
|
|
Quiz
To the right and left are presented two docking models for the complex of ... One of the models is correct while the other is in-correct, can you tell which is which ?
FunHunt
FunHunt is a classifier of correct protein-protein complex orientations. The input to FunHunt are two possible orientations of a complex. A local docking run is performed on the two complexes using RosettaDock. FunHunt then uses features gathered from these docking runs - representing the local energy landscapes of the orientations, and chooses the near-native orientation among both (assuming that one of the orientations is the near native one).
Why do we need it ?
why not ?
