User:Nir London/FunHunt
From Proteopedia
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==FunHunt== | ==FunHunt== | ||
| - | FunHunt is a classifier of correct protein-protein complex orientations. The input to FunHunt are two possible orientations of a complex. A local docking run is performed on the two complexes using RosettaDock. FunHunt then uses features gathered from these docking runs - representing the local energy landscapes of the orientations, and chooses the near-native orientation among both (assuming that one of the orientations is the near native one). | + | FunHunt <ref>London N., Schueler-Furman O. (2008) Funnel hunting in a rough terrain: learning and discriminating native energy funnels. Structure. 16:269-79. </ref><ref>London N., Schueler-Furman O. (2007) Assessing the energy landscape of CAPRI targets by FunHunt. Proteins. 69:809-15</ref>is a classifier of correct protein-protein complex orientations. The input to FunHunt are two possible orientations of a complex. A local docking run is performed on the two complexes using RosettaDock. FunHunt then uses features gathered from these docking runs - representing the local energy landscapes of the orientations, and chooses the near-native orientation among both (assuming that one of the orientations is the near native one). |
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| - | + | <references/> | |
| - | + | ||
Revision as of 11:41, 18 September 2008
|
|
Quiz
To the right and left are two docking models for the complex of recombinant human Stefin B with cysteine proteinase Papain. One of the models is correct while the other is incorrect, can you tell which is which ? to color the correct model blue and find out if you were correct. Let's try this: color the second one .
FunHunt
FunHunt [1][2]is a classifier of correct protein-protein complex orientations. The input to FunHunt are two possible orientations of a complex. A local docking run is performed on the two complexes using RosettaDock. FunHunt then uses features gathered from these docking runs - representing the local energy landscapes of the orientations, and chooses the near-native orientation among both (assuming that one of the orientations is the near native one).
