We apologize for Proteopedia being slow to respond. For the past two years, a new implementation of Proteopedia has been being built. Soon, it will replace this 18-year old system. All existing content will be moved to the new system at a date that will be announced here.

Alignment of 1rpu vs 1r9f

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

Wayne Decatur (Talk | contribs)
(New page: >lcl|50431 1r9f:A Length=121 Score = 226 bits (576), Expect = 1e-64, Method: Compositional matrix adjust. Identities = 106/119 (89%), Positives = 114/119 (95%), Gaps = 3/119 (2%) 1rp...)
Next diff →

Revision as of 01:53, 16 May 2010

>lcl|50431 1r9f:A Length=121 

Score =  226 bits (576),  Expect = 1e-64, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 106/119 (89%), Positives = 114/119 (95%), Gaps = 3/119 (2%)

1rpu 19 ITSPFKLPDESPSWTEWRLYNDE---NPLGFKESWGFGKVVFKRYLRYDRTEASLHRVLG 75 

          +TSPFKLPDESPSWTEWRL+NDE   NPLGFKESWGFGKVVFKRYLRYDRTEASLHRVLG

1r9f 2 MTSPFKLPDESPSWTEWRLHNDETQDNPLGFKESWGFGKVVFKRYLRYDRTEASLHRVLG 61

1rpu 76 SWTGDSVNYAASRFLGANQVGCTYSIRFRGVSVTISGGSRTLQHLCEMAIRSKQELLQL 134 

          SWTGDSVNYAASRF G +Q+GCTYSIRFRGVS+T+SGGSRTLQHLCEMAIRSKQE+LQ+

1rpf 62 SWTGDSVNYAASRFFGFDQIGCTYSIRFRGVSITVSGGSRTLQHLCEMAIRSKQEMLQM 120

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Wayne Decatur

Retrieved from "http://52.214.119.220/wiki/index.php/Alignment_of_1rpu_vs_1r9f"
Personal tools