Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; AMPA IGluRs form **homotetramers**. Each subunit includes an extracellular **amino terminal domain** (ATD) which is responsible for receptor trafficking and modulation, a **ligand-binding domain** (LBD) which activates the receptor upon binding glutamate, and a **transmembrane domain** (TMD) which forms the membrane-spanning ion channel. Also present is a carboxy-terminal domain involved in receptor localization and regulation, although the structure of this domain has not been solved.<ref name="Sobo"/>The structure of AMPA IGluRs or in this case GluA2, is unique in that the symmetry of the receptor changes depending on the domain. The ATD has a local two-fold symmetry, the LBD has a two-fold symmetry, while the TMD has a four-fold symmetry. This symmetry mismatch has implications for function of the receptor with subunits behaving differently depending upon their orientation despite identical primary sequence.<ref name="Sobo"/> For an excellent analysis, see: [[WAYNES PAGE]]
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; AMPA IGluRs form **homotetramers**. Each subunit includes an extracellular **amino terminal domain** (ATD) which is responsible for receptor trafficking and modulation, a **ligand-binding domain** (LBD) which activates the receptor upon binding glutamate, and a **transmembrane domain** (TMD) which forms the membrane-spanning ion channel. Also present is a carboxy-terminal domain involved in receptor localization and regulation, although the structure of this domain has not been solved.<ref name="Sobo"/>The structure of AMPA IGluRs or in this case GluA2, is unique in that the symmetry of the receptor changes depending on the domain. The ATD has a local two-fold symmetry, the LBD has a two-fold symmetry, while the TMD has a four-fold symmetry. This symmetry mismatch has implications for function of the receptor with subunits behaving differently depending upon their orientation despite identical primary sequence.<ref name="Sobo"/> For an excellent analysis, see: [[WAYNES PAGE]]
=====The Amino Terminal Domain=====
=====The Amino Terminal Domain=====
-
1. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **The ATD** is responsible for receptor assembly, trafficking and localization. It has two unique sets of interactions which hold the tetramer together. The **first set of interactions** is present in each pair of dimers and includes residues >…>>>>>>>. The **second set**, which includes residues >>>>>>>>>>>>, effectively holds the pair of dimers together at an angle that is roughly 24 degrees off of the overall two-fold axis.<ref name="Sobo"/><ref>PMID: 19461580</ref>
+
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **The ATD** is responsible for receptor assembly, trafficking and localization. It has two unique sets of interactions which hold the tetramer together. The **first set of interactions** is present in each pair of dimers and includes residues >…>>>>>>>. The **second set**, which includes residues >>>>>>>>>>>>, effectively holds the pair of dimers together at an angle that is roughly 24 degrees off of the overall two-fold axis.<ref name="Sobo"/><ref>PMID: 19461580</ref>
=====The Transmembrane Domain=====
=====The Transmembrane Domain=====
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **The TMD** has a pore structure that is nearly identical to that of the [[Potassium Channel]]. With complete four-fold symmetry, 16 helices form a **precise pore** through which cations can flow through. In the current, inhibitor bound structure, the M3 helices cross at a highly conserved **SYTANLAAF motif**, with Thr 617, Ala 621, and Thr 625 **occluding the ion permeation pathway**.<ref name="Sobo"/> The **narrowest part** of the channel includes the residues Met 629, Thr 625, Ala 621, and Thr 617. Located next to this narrow region lies **Alanine 622**, which is replaced with a threonine in the Lurcher mouse model mentioned previously. This mutation, which introduces a significantly bulkier residue, destabilizes the tight helix crossing associated with the closed state of the receptor, resulting in a constitutively open ion channel. <ref name="Sobo"/>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **The TMD** has a pore structure that is nearly identical to that of the [[Potassium Channel]]. With complete four-fold symmetry, 16 helices form a **precise pore** through which cations can flow through. In the current, inhibitor bound structure, the M3 helices cross at a highly conserved **SYTANLAAF motif**, with Thr 617, Ala 621, and Thr 625 **occluding the ion permeation pathway**.<ref name="Sobo"/> The **narrowest part** of the channel includes the residues Met 629, Thr 625, Ala 621, and Thr 617. Located next to this narrow region lies **Alanine 622**, which is replaced with a threonine in the Lurcher mouse model mentioned previously. This mutation, which introduces a significantly bulkier residue, destabilizes the tight helix crossing associated with the closed state of the receptor, resulting in a constitutively open ion channel. <ref name="Sobo"/>
Line 12: Line 12:
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **The LBD** is located just above the TMD. It has an overall two-fold axis of symmetry with two major groups of interactions which hold the homotetramer together. The **first set of interactions** which holds each dimer together includes residues >>>>>>>>>>>>>>. The **second set of interactions** includes residues >>>>>>>>>>>>>, holding the two dimers in their tetrameric position. Within each LBD lies the so-called **“clamshell”**. This structure is responsible for binding glutamate and “sensitizing” the receptor to allow passage of cations through the channel. Residues >>>>>>>>>>>>, which are responsible for **tightly binding glutamate** within the clamshell, are highly conserved. Glutamate binding causes a conformational change in the LBD which pulls the M3 helices in the TMD apart, opening the channel and allowing for cation passage. A morph of the conformational change in the LBD upon glutamate binding can be **seen here**. Uniquely, due to the varied importance of the homotetramer subunits due to symmetry mismatch, the interaction of glutamate with the **distal subunits** is predicted to result in a greater conformational change and thus plays a more critical role in channel sensitization and activation.<ref name="Sobo"/>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **The LBD** is located just above the TMD. It has an overall two-fold axis of symmetry with two major groups of interactions which hold the homotetramer together. The **first set of interactions** which holds each dimer together includes residues >>>>>>>>>>>>>>. The **second set of interactions** includes residues >>>>>>>>>>>>>, holding the two dimers in their tetrameric position. Within each LBD lies the so-called **“clamshell”**. This structure is responsible for binding glutamate and “sensitizing” the receptor to allow passage of cations through the channel. Residues >>>>>>>>>>>>, which are responsible for **tightly binding glutamate** within the clamshell, are highly conserved. Glutamate binding causes a conformational change in the LBD which pulls the M3 helices in the TMD apart, opening the channel and allowing for cation passage. A morph of the conformational change in the LBD upon glutamate binding can be **seen here**. Uniquely, due to the varied importance of the homotetramer subunits due to symmetry mismatch, the interaction of glutamate with the **distal subunits** is predicted to result in a greater conformational change and thus plays a more critical role in channel sensitization and activation.<ref name="Sobo"/>
====Pharmaceutical Relevance====
====Pharmaceutical Relevance====
-
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; As mentioned previously, extensive investigation into the [[Pharmaceutical drugs|pharmaceutical potential]] of IGluRs as a target for treating various ailments including [[Autism Spectrum Disorder]] symptoms is ongoing. In addition to agents which reduce neural excitation such as benzodiazapines and anticonvulsants, small molecules that potentiate AMPA receptor currents have been proven to relieve cognitive deficits caused by neurodegenerative diseases such as [[Alzheimer’s Disease]].<ref name="Purcel"/> Modulators such as aniracetam and CX614 **bind on the backside** of the ligand-binding core through interactions with a proline ceiling and a serine floor, stabilizing the closed-clamshell conformation. Although these compounds would likely be ineffective in the case of Autism patients because they slow the deactivation of the IGluR channels, this class of compounds has exciting therapeutic potential. <ref name="Jin"/>
+
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; As mentioned previously, extensive investigation into the [[Pharmaceutical drugs|pharmaceutical potential]] of IGluRs as a target for treating various ailments including [[Autism Spectrum Disorders]] symptoms is ongoing. In addition to agents which reduce neural excitation such as benzodiazapines and anticonvulsants, small molecules that potentiate AMPA receptor currents have been proven to relieve cognitive deficits caused by neurodegenerative diseases such as [[Alzheimer’s Disease]].<ref name="Purcel"/> Modulators such as aniracetam and CX614 **bind on the backside** of the ligand-binding core through interactions with a proline ceiling and a serine floor, stabilizing the closed-clamshell conformation. Although these compounds would likely be ineffective in the case of Autism patients because they slow the deactivation of the IGluR channels, this class of compounds has exciting therapeutic potential. <ref name="Jin"/>
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__
__NOEDITSECTION__

Revision as of 17:22, 12 March 2011

Structure of the Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor, GluA2, (3kg2)

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

Additional Resources

For Additional Information, See: Membrane Channels & Pumps For Additional Information, See: Alzheimer’s Disease

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Jin R, Clark S, Weeks AM, Dudman JT, Gouaux E, Partin KM. Mechanism of positive allosteric modulators acting on AMPA receptors. J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 28;25(39):9027-36. PMID:16192394 doi:25/39/9027
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Sobolevsky AI, Rosconi MP, Gouaux E. X-ray structure, symmetry and mechanism of an AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor. Nature. 2009 Dec 10;462(7274):745-56. Epub . PMID:19946266 doi:10.1038/nature08624
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Purcell AE, Jeon OH, Zimmerman AW, Blue ME, Pevsner J. Postmortem brain abnormalities of the glutamate neurotransmitter system in autism. Neurology. 2001 Nov 13;57(9):1618-28. PMID:11706102
  4. Welsh JP, Ahn ES, Placantonakis DG. Is autism due to brain desynchronization? Int J Dev Neurosci. 2005 Apr-May;23(2-3):253-63. PMID:15749250 doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.09.002
  5. Zuo J, De Jager PL, Takahashi KA, Jiang W, Linden DJ, Heintz N. Neurodegeneration in Lurcher mice caused by mutation in delta2 glutamate receptor gene. Nature. 1997 Aug 21;388(6644):769-73. PMID:9285588 doi:10.1038/42009
  6. Rubenstein JL, Merzenich MM. Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Genes Brain Behav. 2003 Oct;2(5):255-67. PMID:14606691
  7. Jin R, Singh SK, Gu S, Furukawa H, Sobolevsky AI, Zhou J, Jin Y, Gouaux E. Crystal structure and association behaviour of the GluR2 amino-terminal domain. EMBO J. 2009 Jun 17;28(12):1812-23. Epub 2009 May 21. PMID:19461580 doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.140
Personal tools