We apologize for Proteopedia being slow to respond. For the past two years, a new implementation of Proteopedia has been being built. Soon, it will replace this 18-year old system. All existing content will be moved to the new system at a date that will be announced here.

Retractions and Fraud

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: A number of PDB entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes. * 3k78 was removed from the PDB on February 8, 2012 due to fraud. See references at [[3k78...)
Line 1: Line 1:
A number of [[PDB]] entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes.
A number of [[PDB]] entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes.
-
* [[3k78]] was removed from the [[PDB]] on February 8, 2012 due to fraud. See references at [[3k78]].
+
* 2012, February: [[3k78]] was removed from the [[PDB]] because it appears to be fraudlent<ref>PMID: 22552066</ref><ref>[http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/protein-structure-retracted-after-investigation-into-highly-improbable-features-journal-calls-it-fraud/ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud], April 2012</ref>.
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
<references />

Revision as of 01:56, 12 May 2012

A number of PDB entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes.

  • 2012, February: 3k78 was removed from the PDB because it appears to be fraudlent[1][2].

References

  1. Abbott A. Trial tests Austrian integrity body. Nature. 2012 May 1;485(7396):15. doi: 10.1038/485015a. PMID:22552066 doi:10.1038/485015a
  2. Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud, April 2012

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky

Personal tools