1g2k

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
==Overview==
==Overview==
-
We have previously reported on the unexpected flipped conformation in the, cyclic sulfamide class of inhibitors. An attempt to induce a symmetric, binding conformation by introducing P2/P2' substituents foreseen to bind, preferentially in the S2/S2' subsite was unsuccessful. On the basis of the, flipped conformation we anticipated that nonsymmetric sulfamide, inhibitors, with P2/P2' side chains modified individually for the S1' and, S2 subsites, should be more potent than the corresponding symmetric, analogues. To test this hypothesis, a set of 18 cyclic sulfamide, inhibitors (11 nonsymmetric and 7 symmetric) with different P2/P2', substituents was prepared and evaluated in an enzyme assay. To rationalize, the structure-activity relationship (SAR) and enable the alignment of the, nonsymmetric inhibitors, i.e., which of the P2/P2' substituents of the, nonsymmetric inhibitors interact with which subsite, a CoMFA study was, performed. The CoMFA model, constructed from the 18 inhibitors in this, study along with seven inhibitors from previous work by our group, has, successfully been used to rationalize the SAR of the cyclic sulfamide, inhibitors. Furthermore, from the information presented herein, the SAR of, the cyclic sulfamide class of inhibitors seems to differ from the SAR of, the related cyclic urea inhibitors reported by DuPont and DuPont-Merck.
+
We have previously reported on the unexpected flipped conformation in the cyclic sulfamide class of inhibitors. An attempt to induce a symmetric binding conformation by introducing P2/P2' substituents foreseen to bind preferentially in the S2/S2' subsite was unsuccessful. On the basis of the flipped conformation we anticipated that nonsymmetric sulfamide inhibitors, with P2/P2' side chains modified individually for the S1' and S2 subsites, should be more potent than the corresponding symmetric analogues. To test this hypothesis, a set of 18 cyclic sulfamide inhibitors (11 nonsymmetric and 7 symmetric) with different P2/P2' substituents was prepared and evaluated in an enzyme assay. To rationalize the structure-activity relationship (SAR) and enable the alignment of the nonsymmetric inhibitors, i.e., which of the P2/P2' substituents of the nonsymmetric inhibitors interact with which subsite, a CoMFA study was performed. The CoMFA model, constructed from the 18 inhibitors in this study along with seven inhibitors from previous work by our group, has successfully been used to rationalize the SAR of the cyclic sulfamide inhibitors. Furthermore, from the information presented herein, the SAR of the cyclic sulfamide class of inhibitors seems to differ from the SAR of the related cyclic urea inhibitors reported by DuPont and DuPont-Merck.
==About this Structure==
==About this Structure==
Line 20: Line 20:
[[Category: protease inhibitors]]
[[Category: protease inhibitors]]
-
''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Fri Feb 15 15:50:24 2008''
+
''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Thu Feb 21 12:45:25 2008''

Revision as of 10:45, 21 February 2008


1g2k, resolution 1.95Å

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

HIV-1 PROTEASE WITH CYCLIC SULFAMIDE INHIBITOR, AHA047

Overview

We have previously reported on the unexpected flipped conformation in the cyclic sulfamide class of inhibitors. An attempt to induce a symmetric binding conformation by introducing P2/P2' substituents foreseen to bind preferentially in the S2/S2' subsite was unsuccessful. On the basis of the flipped conformation we anticipated that nonsymmetric sulfamide inhibitors, with P2/P2' side chains modified individually for the S1' and S2 subsites, should be more potent than the corresponding symmetric analogues. To test this hypothesis, a set of 18 cyclic sulfamide inhibitors (11 nonsymmetric and 7 symmetric) with different P2/P2' substituents was prepared and evaluated in an enzyme assay. To rationalize the structure-activity relationship (SAR) and enable the alignment of the nonsymmetric inhibitors, i.e., which of the P2/P2' substituents of the nonsymmetric inhibitors interact with which subsite, a CoMFA study was performed. The CoMFA model, constructed from the 18 inhibitors in this study along with seven inhibitors from previous work by our group, has successfully been used to rationalize the SAR of the cyclic sulfamide inhibitors. Furthermore, from the information presented herein, the SAR of the cyclic sulfamide class of inhibitors seems to differ from the SAR of the related cyclic urea inhibitors reported by DuPont and DuPont-Merck.

About this Structure

1G2K is a Single protein structure of sequence from Human immunodeficiency virus 1 with as ligand. Active as HIV-1 retropepsin, with EC number 3.4.23.16 Full crystallographic information is available from OCA.

Reference

Synthesis and comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) of symmetric and nonsymmetric cyclic sulfamide HIV-1 protease inhibitors., Schaal W, Karlsson A, Ahlsen G, Lindberg J, Andersson HO, Danielson UH, Classon B, Unge T, Samuelsson B, Hulten J, Hallberg A, Karlen A, J Med Chem. 2001 Jan 18;44(2):155-69. PMID:11170625

Page seeded by OCA on Thu Feb 21 12:45:25 2008

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

OCA

Personal tools