15.5kD/Snu13/L7Ae protein

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

Kelly Hrywkiw (Talk | contribs)
(New page: == Structure of the protein homologues: 15.5kD, Snu13, and L7Ae == by Kelly Hrywkiw {{STRUCTURE_1e7k | PDB=1e7k | SCENE= }} __TOC__ =Introduction= The human protein 15.5kD and ...)
Next diff →

Revision as of 02:18, 15 August 2012

Structure of the protein homologues: 15.5kD, Snu13, and L7Ae

by Kelly Hrywkiw Template:STRUCTURE 1e7k

Contents


Introduction

The human protein 15.5kD and its yeast (Snu13p) and archaeal (L7Ae) homologues function in the processing of pre-ribosomal RNA as part of the box C/D and H/ACA small ribonucleoprotein particle (sRNP – archaea) or small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein particle (snoRNP – eukarya) nucleotide modification complexes (s(no)RNPs)[1][2]. In addition, 15.5kD and Snu13p function in U4 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) spliceosomal biogenesis[2]. The capability to function in dual roles lies in the ability to recognize a helix-bulge-helix (kink-turn) RNA motif that is present in the different RNPs[3]

A variation of the kink-turn motif, known as the kink-loop motif, can be found in the C/D and H/ACA RNAs [1]. Interestingly, the eukaryotic proteins and their archaeal homologue do not interact with the different motifs in the same manner, even though share a conserved sequence similarity [3]. For example, while L7Ae exhibits the same binding affinity for both the kink-turn and kink-loop sRNA motifs, its eukaryotic homologues only bind specifically to the kink-turn motif and discriminate against the kink-loop motif [3][1].

Solved structures of the proteins include: 15.5kD in complex with a U4 snRNA fragment 1E7K, 15.5kD in complex with hPrp31 and a U4 snRNA fragment 2OZB, Snu13p without RNA 1ZWZ, Archaeoglobus fulgidus L7Ae-box C/D with RNA 1RLG, Methanococcus jannaschii L7Ae-H/ACA with RNA 1RA4, and Pyrococcus abyssi L7Ae without RNA 1PXW.

Role in pre-ribosomal RNA processing

Ribosomes consist of both RNA and protein, and are designated large ribonucleprotein (RNP) particles. Each ribosome contains two subunits (60S and 40S), four ribosomal RNAs (5S, 5.8S, 18S, and 25/28S rRNA), and approximately 75 associated proteins [4]. The processing of the pre-rRNAs requires a complex set of posttranscriptional modification steps after transcription [4]. One such step involves extensive processing through pseudouridylation and 2’-O-ribose methylation at sites specified by various s(no)RNAs (C/D box s(no)RNAs specify 2’-O-ribose methylation and H/ACA s(no)RNA specify pseudouridylation) and associated proteins to form s(no)RNPs [4][5]. Specifically, the 5’ region of U3 s(no)RNA containing C’/D and B/C box pairs interacts with 5’-ETS and 17S/18S areas of the pre-rRNA[5]. U3 also binds a set of proteins to form the U3 s(no)RNP complex [1].

Snu13p/15.5kD/L7Ae interacts with U3 s(no)RNA through a kink-turn RNA motif [4]. The protein initiates box C/D assembly by binding the kink-turn of the C/D RNAs [1]. Once the s(no)RNP is fully assembled the RNA regions bind to complementary regions in target pre-rRNA. This is followed by catalysis of the methyl transferase reaction by the associated proteins [1].

Role in pre-messenger RNA splicing

The processing of pre-mRNA takes place through the use of a large dynamic machine known as the spliceosome, through which introns are removed and exons are spliced together to create a mature mRNA[6][7]. The spliceosome is comprised of five snRNA molecules (snRNAs U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6) and over one hundred associated proteins[6][7]. Assembly of the spliceosome is thought to take place in a stepwise manner around the pre-mRNA transcript[6][7]. The first step involves recognition of the 5’ splice site by U1 snRNP, followed by recognition of the branch point sequence by U2 snRNP[6][7]. From this point the tri-snNRP consisting of U4/U6•U5[6][7] together with the five snRNPs form the precatalytic spliceosome, which must undergo a series of changes before it can actively splice[8][7][9][6].

U4 snRNA has a 5’ stem-loop containing a kink-turn that has been shown to interact with 15.5kD [10]. There is evidence to suggest that 15.5kD plays a role in late stage spliceosomal assembly, prior to splicing catalysis [10]. In addition, it may be involved in binding other proteins that have been found to indirectly associate with U4 snRNA such as 61k (Prp31p in yeast), as well as the 20/60/90k complex which interacts with the U4/U6 duplex [10]. The homologues for 60k and 90k in yeast are Prp4p and Prp3p respectively; there is no yeast homologue for 20k.

Sructure of 15.5kD in complex with U4 snRNA fragment

Structure of 15.5kD bound with a U4 snRNP fragment (1e7k)

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

Structure comparison between 15.5kD, Snu13p, and L7Ae homologues

Structurally, Snu13p and 15.5kD are more similar than either to L7Ae; however, they exhibit different binding affinities to cognate RNAs[5][3]. The eukaryotic proteins exhibit very specific binding (ie. will only bind to RNA with the kink-turn motif), whereas their archaeal homologue does not (ie. will bind to RNA exhibiting either the kink-turn or kink-loop motifs)[5][3]. Differences in structure between the archaeal and eukaryotic proteins lie in the α2-β2 loop and the β4-α6 loop which do not directly bind DNA, however have been shown to contribute to the structural integrity of the RNA binding elements[3]. In the eukaryotic proteins there is the addition of two amino acids that creates further hydrogen bonding between β2 and β4, which in turn may provide further stabilization to α2[3]. The N-terminus also carries an area of structural differentiation; preceding α1 in L7Ae is a random coil, whereas in 15.5kD and Snu13p there is a β-strand which may participate in further stabilization of the protein[3]. Overall, the structures are very similar, such that the small differences do not seem likely to contribute to their differential binding.

The structure itself may not the most important aspect when comparing the homologues, rather the amino acid composition. There are five amino acids located at the RNA binding region that are conserved within each of archaea and eukarya, however vary between the two. One such amino acid lies towards the N-terminal side of the RNA binding region, in L7Ae it is Lys26 (Methanocaldococcus jannashii), and in 15.5kD it is Gln34. Towards the C-terminal side of the RNA binding region located in loop 9 lie the four remaining residues Leu-Glu-Aal-Ala (L7Ae) and (15.5kD). It is the difference between these amino acids that allow L7Ae to bind the kink-loop motif[5].

Additional Resources

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 PMCID:PMC2802039
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Dobbyn HC, McEwan PA, Krause A, Novak-Frazer L, Bella J, O'Keefe RT. Analysis of pre-mRNA and pre-rRNA processing factor Snu13p structure and mutants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Sep 7;360(4):857-62. Epub 2007 Jul 9. PMID:17631273 doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.06.163
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Oruganti S, Zhang Y, Li H. Structural comparison of yeast snoRNP and spliceosomal protein Snu13p with its homologs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Jul 29;333(2):550-4. PMID:15963469 doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.141
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Venema J, Tollervey D. Ribosome synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet. 1999;33:261-311. PMID:10690410 doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.261
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Marmier-Gourrier N, Clery A, Senty-Segault V, Charpentier B, Schlotter F, Leclerc F, Fournier R, Branlant C. A structural, phylogenetic, and functional study of 15.5-kD/Snu13 protein binding on U3 small nucleolar RNA. RNA. 2003 Jul;9(7):821-38. PMID:12810916
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 van der Feltz C, Anthony K, Brilot A, Pomeranz Krummel DA. Architecture of the Spliceosome. Biochemistry. 2012 Apr 10. PMID:22471593 doi:10.1021/bi201215r
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 Sperling J, Azubel M, Sperling R. Structure and function of the Pre-mRNA splicing machine. Structure. 2008 Nov 12;16(11):1605-15. PMID:19000813 doi:10.1016/j.str.2008.08.011
  8. Zhang L, Xu T, Maeder C, Bud LO, Shanks J, Nix J, Guthrie C, Pleiss JA, Zhao R. Structural evidence for consecutive Hel308-like modules in the spliceosomal ATPase Brr2. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009 Jul;16(7):731-9. Epub 2009 Jun 14. PMID:19525970 doi:10.1038/nsmb.1625
  9. Zhang L, Xu T, Maeder C, Bud LO, Shanks J, Nix J, Guthrie C, Pleiss JA, Zhao R. Structural evidence for consecutive Hel308-like modules in the spliceosomal ATPase Brr2. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009 Jul;16(7):731-9. Epub 2009 Jun 14. PMID:19525970 doi:10.1038/nsmb.1625
  10. 10.00 10.01 10.02 10.03 10.04 10.05 10.06 10.07 10.08 10.09 10.10 10.11 Vidovic I, Nottrott S, Hartmuth K, Luhrmann R, Ficner R. Crystal structure of the spliceosomal 15.5kD protein bound to a U4 snRNA fragment. Mol Cell. 2000 Dec;6(6):1331-42. PMID:11163207

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Wayne Decatur, Kelly Hrywkiw, Alexander Berchansky

Personal tools