1rrr
From Proteopedia
(New page: 200px<br /><applet load="1rrr" size="450" color="white" frame="true" align="right" spinBox="true" caption="1rrr" /> '''RNA DUPLEX CONTAINING A PURINE-RICH STRAND, ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | [[Image:1rrr.gif|left|200px]]<br /><applet load="1rrr" size=" | + | [[Image:1rrr.gif|left|200px]]<br /><applet load="1rrr" size="350" color="white" frame="true" align="right" spinBox="true" |
caption="1rrr" /> | caption="1rrr" /> | ||
'''RNA DUPLEX CONTAINING A PURINE-RICH STRAND, NMR, 10 STRUCTURES'''<br /> | '''RNA DUPLEX CONTAINING A PURINE-RICH STRAND, NMR, 10 STRUCTURES'''<br /> | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| - | The structures of d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC). | + | The structures of d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), and r(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC) have been determined in solution from NMR data. Globally, the pure DNA and RNA duplexes were in the B and A forms, respectively. The two DNA.RNA hybrids were neither A nor B, but closer globally to the A than the B form. However, the thermodynamically less stable d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) duplex has a significantly different conformation from r(GAAGAGAAGC). d(GCTTCTCTTC). Structures were calculated based on the NMR data, using restrained molecular dynamics. A new approach to the treatment of conformational averaging based on a prioriprobabilities has been used. The nucleotides were treated by fitting the scalar coupling data and NOE time courses to a two-state model comprising N and S sugar puckers each with a different glycosidic torsion angle, and the mole fraction of the S state. Restraint sets for different distributions of N and S states within molecules were constructed, such that each nucleotide was weighted in the ensemble according to the mole fractions (or a prioriprobabilities). The individual nucleotide conformations were strongly restrained, whereas the internucleotide restraints were set relatively loosely. Ensembles of conformations were generated and assessed by comparison of the NOEs calculated from ensemble-averaged relaxation matrices with the experimental NOEs. The ensemble averages accounted for the experimental data much better than any individual member, or for structures calculated assuming a single unique conformation. The two hybrids populated different degrees of conformational space. There was a general trend in minor and major groove widths in the order d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) and a similar progression in global character from B-like to A-like structures. Furthermore, r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC) showed a greater dispersion of conformations in the ensemble than d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), reflecting the greater flexibility of the sugars. If conformational averaging of the nucleotides is ignored, incorrect virtual structures are produced that nevertheless are able to satisfy a substantial fraction of the experimental data. |
==About this Structure== | ==About this Structure== | ||
| - | 1RRR is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_complex Protein complex] structure of sequences from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ ]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http:// | + | 1RRR is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_complex Protein complex] structure of sequences from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ ]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=1RRR OCA]. |
==Reference== | ==Reference== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Category: Protein complex]] | [[Category: Protein complex]] | ||
[[Category: Brown, T.]] | [[Category: Brown, T.]] | ||
| - | [[Category: Conn, G | + | [[Category: Conn, G L.]] |
| - | [[Category: Gyi, J | + | [[Category: Gyi, J I.]] |
| - | [[Category: Lane, A | + | [[Category: Lane, A N.]] |
[[Category: a-form]] | [[Category: a-form]] | ||
[[Category: purine/pyrimidine-rich strands]] | [[Category: purine/pyrimidine-rich strands]] | ||
[[Category: rna duplex]] | [[Category: rna duplex]] | ||
| - | ''Page seeded by [http:// | + | ''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Thu Feb 21 14:53:55 2008'' |
Revision as of 12:53, 21 February 2008
|
RNA DUPLEX CONTAINING A PURINE-RICH STRAND, NMR, 10 STRUCTURES
Overview
The structures of d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), and r(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC) have been determined in solution from NMR data. Globally, the pure DNA and RNA duplexes were in the B and A forms, respectively. The two DNA.RNA hybrids were neither A nor B, but closer globally to the A than the B form. However, the thermodynamically less stable d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) duplex has a significantly different conformation from r(GAAGAGAAGC). d(GCTTCTCTTC). Structures were calculated based on the NMR data, using restrained molecular dynamics. A new approach to the treatment of conformational averaging based on a prioriprobabilities has been used. The nucleotides were treated by fitting the scalar coupling data and NOE time courses to a two-state model comprising N and S sugar puckers each with a different glycosidic torsion angle, and the mole fraction of the S state. Restraint sets for different distributions of N and S states within molecules were constructed, such that each nucleotide was weighted in the ensemble according to the mole fractions (or a prioriprobabilities). The individual nucleotide conformations were strongly restrained, whereas the internucleotide restraints were set relatively loosely. Ensembles of conformations were generated and assessed by comparison of the NOEs calculated from ensemble-averaged relaxation matrices with the experimental NOEs. The ensemble averages accounted for the experimental data much better than any individual member, or for structures calculated assuming a single unique conformation. The two hybrids populated different degrees of conformational space. There was a general trend in minor and major groove widths in the order d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) and a similar progression in global character from B-like to A-like structures. Furthermore, r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC) showed a greater dispersion of conformations in the ensemble than d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), reflecting the greater flexibility of the sugars. If conformational averaging of the nucleotides is ignored, incorrect virtual structures are produced that nevertheless are able to satisfy a substantial fraction of the experimental data.
About this Structure
1RRR is a Protein complex structure of sequences from [1]. Full crystallographic information is available from OCA.
Reference
Solution structures of DNA.RNA hybrids with purine-rich and pyrimidine-rich strands: comparison with the homologous DNA and RNA duplexes., Gyi JI, Lane AN, Conn GL, Brown T, Biochemistry. 1998 Jan 6;37(1):73-80. PMID:9425027
Page seeded by OCA on Thu Feb 21 14:53:55 2008
