2dfy
From Proteopedia
(New page: 200px<br /><applet load="2dfy" size="450" color="white" frame="true" align="right" spinBox="true" caption="2dfy, resolution 1.650Å" /> '''Crystal structure o...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | [[Image:2dfy.jpg|left|200px]]<br /><applet load="2dfy" size=" | + | [[Image:2dfy.jpg|left|200px]]<br /><applet load="2dfy" size="350" color="white" frame="true" align="right" spinBox="true" |
caption="2dfy, resolution 1.650Å" /> | caption="2dfy, resolution 1.650Å" /> | ||
'''Crystal structure of a cyclized protein fusion of LMO4 LIM domains 1 and 2 with the LIM interacting domain of LDB1'''<br /> | '''Crystal structure of a cyclized protein fusion of LMO4 LIM domains 1 and 2 with the LIM interacting domain of LDB1'''<br /> | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| - | The study of protein-protein interactions can be hampered by the | + | The study of protein-protein interactions can be hampered by the instability of one or more of the protein complex components. In this study, we showed that intein-mediated cyclization can be used to engineer an artificial intramolecular cyclic protein complex between two interacting proteins: the largely unstable LIM-only protein 4 (LMO4) and an unstructured domain of LIM domain binding protein 1 (ldb1). The X-ray structure of the cyclic complex is identical to noncyclized versions of the complex. Chemical and thermal denaturation assays using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence and dynamic light scattering were used to compare the relative stabilities of the cyclized complex, the intermolecular (or free) complex, and two linear versions of the intramolecular complex (in which the interacting domains of LMO4 and ldb1 were fused, via a flexible linker, in either orientation). In terms of resistance to denaturation, the cyclic complex is the most stable variant and the intermolecular complex is the least stable; however, the two linear intramolecular variants show significant differences in stability. These differences appear to be related to the relative contact order (the average distance in sequence between residues that make contacts within a structure) of key binding residues at the interface of the two proteins. Thus, the restriction of the more stable component of a complex may enhance stability to a greater extent than restraining less stable components. |
==About this Structure== | ==About this Structure== | ||
| - | 2DFY is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_protein Single protein] structure of sequence from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mus_musculus Mus musculus] with ZN and GOL as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ligands ligands]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http:// | + | 2DFY is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_protein Single protein] structure of sequence from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mus_musculus Mus musculus] with <scene name='pdbligand=ZN:'>ZN</scene> and <scene name='pdbligand=GOL:'>GOL</scene> as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ligands ligands]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=2DFY OCA]. |
==Reference== | ==Reference== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Category: Mus musculus]] | [[Category: Mus musculus]] | ||
[[Category: Single protein]] | [[Category: Single protein]] | ||
| - | [[Category: Collyer, C | + | [[Category: Collyer, C A.]] |
| - | [[Category: Graham, S | + | [[Category: Graham, S C.]] |
| - | [[Category: Guss, J | + | [[Category: Guss, J M.]] |
| - | [[Category: Jeffries, C | + | [[Category: Jeffries, C M.J.]] |
| - | [[Category: Matthews, J | + | [[Category: Matthews, J M.]] |
[[Category: GOL]] | [[Category: GOL]] | ||
[[Category: ZN]] | [[Category: ZN]] | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[[Category: zinc finger]] | [[Category: zinc finger]] | ||
| - | ''Page seeded by [http:// | + | ''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Thu Feb 21 16:58:23 2008'' |
Revision as of 14:58, 21 February 2008
|
Crystal structure of a cyclized protein fusion of LMO4 LIM domains 1 and 2 with the LIM interacting domain of LDB1
Overview
The study of protein-protein interactions can be hampered by the instability of one or more of the protein complex components. In this study, we showed that intein-mediated cyclization can be used to engineer an artificial intramolecular cyclic protein complex between two interacting proteins: the largely unstable LIM-only protein 4 (LMO4) and an unstructured domain of LIM domain binding protein 1 (ldb1). The X-ray structure of the cyclic complex is identical to noncyclized versions of the complex. Chemical and thermal denaturation assays using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence and dynamic light scattering were used to compare the relative stabilities of the cyclized complex, the intermolecular (or free) complex, and two linear versions of the intramolecular complex (in which the interacting domains of LMO4 and ldb1 were fused, via a flexible linker, in either orientation). In terms of resistance to denaturation, the cyclic complex is the most stable variant and the intermolecular complex is the least stable; however, the two linear intramolecular variants show significant differences in stability. These differences appear to be related to the relative contact order (the average distance in sequence between residues that make contacts within a structure) of key binding residues at the interface of the two proteins. Thus, the restriction of the more stable component of a complex may enhance stability to a greater extent than restraining less stable components.
About this Structure
2DFY is a Single protein structure of sequence from Mus musculus with and as ligands. Full crystallographic information is available from OCA.
Reference
Stabilization of a binary protein complex by intein-mediated cyclization., Jeffries CM, Graham SC, Stokes PH, Collyer CA, Guss JM, Matthews JM, Protein Sci. 2006 Nov;15(11):2612-8. Epub 2006 Sep 25. PMID:17001033
Page seeded by OCA on Thu Feb 21 16:58:23 2008
