Connexin
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
'''''Structure:''''' | '''''Structure:''''' | ||
- | The overall structure of the Cx26 gap junction channel, which is formed by two connexons related to each other by a crystallographic two-fold symmetry axis | + | The overall structure of the Cx26 gap junction channel, which is formed by two connexons related to each other by a crystallographic two-fold symmetry axis.The height of the modelled structure of the gap junction channel without disordered cytoplasmic loop and C-terminal segment is approximately 155A °. The transmembrane region and membrane surfaces were deduced from the distribution of hydrophobic and aromatic amino acid residues along the noncrystallographic six-fold axis It is a tsuzumi shape, a traditional Japanese drum.<ref name='Structure'/> [[Image:distances a.jpg]] |
+ | The protomers in each hexameric connexon are related by a sixfold non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS) axis perpendicular to the membrane plane . The transmembrane region of the channel is 38A ° thick.TM2 extends about 19A ° from the membrane surface into the cytoplasm. The extracellular region of the connexon extends 23A ° from the membrane surface and interdigitates to the opposite connexon by 6A °, resulting in the intercellular ‘gap’ of 40A °. The extracellular lobes are not protruding so much, as indicated by the structural analyses of split gap junction channels with atomic force microscopy and electron microscopy. The relatively flat lobes could be attributed to the conformational change of the extracellular region induced by the docking of two connexons. The diameter of the connexon is biggest at the cytoplasmic side | ||
of the membrane, 92A ° , and smallest at the extracellular side, 51A ° . | of the membrane, 92A ° , and smallest at the extracellular side, 51A ° . | ||
- | Viewed from the top, the channel looks like a ‘hexagonal nut’ with a pore in the centre | + | Viewed from the top, the channel looks like a ‘hexagonal nut’ with a pore in the centre .The diameter of the pore is about 40A ° at the cytoplasmic side of the channel, narrowing to 14A ° near the extracellular membrane surface and then widening to 25A ° in the extracellular space.<ref name='Structure'/> |
- | + | [[Image:distances b.jpg]] | |
'''''Structure of the cx26 protomer:''''' | '''''Structure of the cx26 protomer:''''' | ||
The protomer has four transmembrane segments (TM1–4), two extracellular loops (E1 and E2), a cytoplasmic loop, an N-terminal helix (NTH), and a C-terminal segment (Fig. 3). Cx26 forms a typical four-helix bundle in which any pair of adjacent helices is antiparallel. TM1 and TM2 face the interior, whereas TM3 and TM4 face the hydrophobic membrane environment. There has been controversy about the identity of the major pore-lining helix, on the basis of accessibility studies of substituted cysteines and sequence analysis. One set of data favours TM3 as the major pore helix and the other favours TM1 . The helical arrangement of our structure is consistent with the latter model. The major pore-lining helix TM1 is inclined, so that the pore diameter narrows from the cytoplasmic to the extracellular side of the membrane, and ends in a short 310 helix. | The protomer has four transmembrane segments (TM1–4), two extracellular loops (E1 and E2), a cytoplasmic loop, an N-terminal helix (NTH), and a C-terminal segment (Fig. 3). Cx26 forms a typical four-helix bundle in which any pair of adjacent helices is antiparallel. TM1 and TM2 face the interior, whereas TM3 and TM4 face the hydrophobic membrane environment. There has been controversy about the identity of the major pore-lining helix, on the basis of accessibility studies of substituted cysteines and sequence analysis. One set of data favours TM3 as the major pore helix and the other favours TM1 . The helical arrangement of our structure is consistent with the latter model. The major pore-lining helix TM1 is inclined, so that the pore diameter narrows from the cytoplasmic to the extracellular side of the membrane, and ends in a short 310 helix. |
Revision as of 11:09, 12 May 2015
Your Heading Here (maybe something like 'Structure')
|
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Zonta F, Buratto D, Cassini C, Bortolozzi M, Mammano F. Molecular dynamics simulations highlight structural and functional alterations in deafness-related M34T mutation of connexin 26. Front Physiol. 2014 Mar 4;5:85. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00085. eCollection 2014. PMID:24624091 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00085
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Suga M, Maeda S, Nakagawa S, Yamashita E, Tsukihara T. A description of the structural determination procedures of a gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2009 Aug;65(Pt 8):758-66. Epub 2009, Jul 10. PMID:19622859 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909014711
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Ambrosi C, Walker AE, Depriest AD, Cone AC, Lu C, Badger J, Skerrett IM, Sosinsky GE. Analysis of trafficking, stability and function of human connexin 26 gap junction channels with deafness-causing mutations in the fourth transmembrane helix. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e70916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070916. eCollection, 2013. PMID:23967136 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070916
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Oshima A, Tani K, Toloue MM, Hiroaki Y, Smock A, Inukai S, Cone A, Nicholson BJ, Sosinsky GE, Fujiyoshi Y. Asymmetric Configurations and N-terminal Rearrangements in Connexin26 Gap Junction Channels. J Mol Biol. 2011 Jan 21;405(3):724-35. Epub 2010 Nov 20. PMID:21094651 doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.032
Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)
Safaa Salah Hussiesy, Michal Harel, Doaa Naffaa, Jaime Prilusky