Regulator of G protein signaling

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 35: Line 35:
Gα<sub>i1</sub> subunits adopt a conserved fold composed of <scene name='70/701447/All-helical-domain/6'>α helical domain</scene> , a helical domain of six α helices shown as blue cartoon and a GTPase domain shown in gray cartoons. The GTPase domain hydrolyzes GTP and provides most of Gα's binding surfaces for Gβγ, receptors, effectors and RGS proteins. <scene name='70/701447/Gi-rgs4/20'>The GTPase domain</scene> contains three flexible regions designated switch-I presented as blue sticks, switch-II presented as magenta sticks and switch-III presented as green sticks that change conformation in response to GTP binding and hydrolysis, GDP–Mg<sup>+2</sup>, bound in the active site of Gα<sub>i1</sub> is shown as a ball-and-stick model. The three switch regions of Gα<sub>i1</sub>: residues 176–184, 201–215, and 233–241, respectively . <ref>PMID: 9108480</ref>
Gα<sub>i1</sub> subunits adopt a conserved fold composed of <scene name='70/701447/All-helical-domain/6'>α helical domain</scene> , a helical domain of six α helices shown as blue cartoon and a GTPase domain shown in gray cartoons. The GTPase domain hydrolyzes GTP and provides most of Gα's binding surfaces for Gβγ, receptors, effectors and RGS proteins. <scene name='70/701447/Gi-rgs4/20'>The GTPase domain</scene> contains three flexible regions designated switch-I presented as blue sticks, switch-II presented as magenta sticks and switch-III presented as green sticks that change conformation in response to GTP binding and hydrolysis, GDP–Mg<sup>+2</sup>, bound in the active site of Gα<sub>i1</sub> is shown as a ball-and-stick model. The three switch regions of Gα<sub>i1</sub>: residues 176–184, 201–215, and 233–241, respectively . <ref>PMID: 9108480</ref>
-
== RGS-G proteins interactionS ==
+
== RGS-G proteins interactions ==
There are many RGS protein residues in the vicinity of the RGS domain–Gα interface that contribute to RGS-G proteins interaction. These residues classified into two major groups. First group is Significant & Conserved residues that located mainly in the center of the RGS domain–Gα interface and have the primary role in accelerating Gα GTPase by stabilizing Gα in a conformation optimal for GTP hydrolysis. Whereas the second group is putative Modulatory residues that located mostly at the periphery of this interface where they contribute to Gα subunit recognition.<ref>PMID: 21685921</ref>
There are many RGS protein residues in the vicinity of the RGS domain–Gα interface that contribute to RGS-G proteins interaction. These residues classified into two major groups. First group is Significant & Conserved residues that located mainly in the center of the RGS domain–Gα interface and have the primary role in accelerating Gα GTPase by stabilizing Gα in a conformation optimal for GTP hydrolysis. Whereas the second group is putative Modulatory residues that located mostly at the periphery of this interface where they contribute to Gα subunit recognition.<ref>PMID: 21685921</ref>

Revision as of 12:08, 23 May 2015

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) interactions with G proteins – RGS4-Gαi as a model structure.

RGS4-Gα complex

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

References

  1. Kosloff M, Travis AM, Bosch DE, Siderovski DP, Arshavsky VY. Integrating energy calculations with functional assays to decipher the specificity of G protein-RGS protein interactions. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011 Jun 19;18(7):846-53. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2068. PMID:21685921 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2068
  2. Milligan G, Kostenis E. Heterotrimeric G-proteins: a short history. Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Jan;147 Suppl 1:S46-55. PMID:16402120 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706405
  3. Tesmer JJ, Berman DM, Gilman AG, Sprang SR. Structure of RGS4 bound to AlF4--activated G(i alpha1): stabilization of the transition state for GTP hydrolysis. Cell. 1997 Apr 18;89(2):251-61. PMID:9108480
  4. Kosloff M, Travis AM, Bosch DE, Siderovski DP, Arshavsky VY. Integrating energy calculations with functional assays to decipher the specificity of G protein-RGS protein interactions. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011 Jun 19;18(7):846-53. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2068. PMID:21685921 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2068

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Ali Asli, Denise Salem, Michal Harel, Joel L. Sussman, Jaime Prilusky

Personal tools