User:Anthony Milto/Sandbox 1
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
MyoD is subject to regulation both by complex formation with other proteins and by DNA binding. Differences in E-box sequences, as well as sequences flanking the E-box, and in complex formation determine the transcription factor's effect and allow differentiation into a diverse array of muscle cells <ref>DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-6-226</ref>. MyoD is only functional when bound to DNA. It has been proposed that DNA binding, with its accompanying structural changes, is required in vivo to free the acidic activation domain and activate MyoD's myogenic functions <ref>Weintraub, H., Dwarki, V. J., Verma, I., Davis, R., Hollenberg, S., Snider, L., Lassar, A., Tapscott, S. J. Muscle-specific transcriptional activation by MyoD. Genes & Dev. '''1991'''. 5. 1377-1386 </ref>. | MyoD is subject to regulation both by complex formation with other proteins and by DNA binding. Differences in E-box sequences, as well as sequences flanking the E-box, and in complex formation determine the transcription factor's effect and allow differentiation into a diverse array of muscle cells <ref>DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-6-226</ref>. MyoD is only functional when bound to DNA. It has been proposed that DNA binding, with its accompanying structural changes, is required in vivo to free the acidic activation domain and activate MyoD's myogenic functions <ref>Weintraub, H., Dwarki, V. J., Verma, I., Davis, R., Hollenberg, S., Snider, L., Lassar, A., Tapscott, S. J. Muscle-specific transcriptional activation by MyoD. Genes & Dev. '''1991'''. 5. 1377-1386 </ref>. | ||
| - | MyoD functions as a transcriptional activator only as a heterodimer with E proteins, which are a sub-family of bHLH proteins. This interaction takes place in the bHLH domain of both proteins. In one experiment, forced binding of E12 to MyoD that had been inhibited using E protein fragments substantially restored MyoD's activity | + | MyoD functions as a transcriptional activator only as a heterodimer with E proteins, which are a sub-family of bHLH proteins. This interaction takes place in the bHLH domain of both proteins. In one experiment, forced binding of E12 to MyoD that had been inhibited using E protein fragments substantially restored MyoD's activity <ref>doi: 10.1101/gad.1765109</ref>. The myogenic ability of MyoD is inhibited by the presence of another bHLH protein known as Twist. Twist inhibits MyoD by competitively binding E proteins and preventing MyoD-E protein heterodimers from forming [[6]]. |
The protein IFRD1 is an activating cofactor of MyoD. This protein and MyoD cooperatively activate muscle-specific enhancers. This same cofactor also represses NF-κB, which has been shown to inhibit MyoD mRNA translation <ref>PMID: 21127072</ref> | The protein IFRD1 is an activating cofactor of MyoD. This protein and MyoD cooperatively activate muscle-specific enhancers. This same cofactor also represses NF-κB, which has been shown to inhibit MyoD mRNA translation <ref>PMID: 21127072</ref> | ||
Revision as of 01:51, 13 October 2015
Function and Classification
MyoD, along with Myf5, is responsible for muscle cell differentiation and establishment of the myogenic lineage. It is a member of the basic helix loop helix (bHLH) family and myogenic factors subfamily of proteins [1].
| |||||||||||
References
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC232510/
- ↑ Phospho Site Plus. http://www.phosphosite.org/proteinAction.do?id=3637&showAllSites=true (accessed October 6, 2015)
- ↑ Jones S. An overview of the basic helix-loop-helix proteins. Genome Biol. 2004;5(6):226. Epub 2004 May 28. PMID:15186484 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-6-226
- ↑ Weintraub, H., Dwarki, V. J., Verma, I., Davis, R., Hollenberg, S., Snider, L., Lassar, A., Tapscott, S. J. Muscle-specific transcriptional activation by MyoD. Genes & Dev. 1991. 5. 1377-1386
- ↑ Gerber, A. N., Klesert, T. R., Berstrom, D. A., Tapscott, S. J. Two domains of MyoD mediate transcriptional activation of genes in repressive chromatin: a mechanism for lineage determination in myogenesis. Genes & Dev. 1997. 11. 436-450
- ↑ Kophengnavong, T., Michnowicz, J. E., & Blackwell, T. K. Establishment of Distinct MyoD, E2A, and Twist DNA Binding Specificities by Different Basic Region-DNA Conformations. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2000, 20. 261–272.
- ↑ Jones S. An overview of the basic helix-loop-helix proteins. Genome Biol. 2004;5(6):226. Epub 2004 May 28. PMID:15186484 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-6-226
- ↑ Weintraub, H., Dwarki, V. J., Verma, I., Davis, R., Hollenberg, S., Snider, L., Lassar, A., Tapscott, S. J. Muscle-specific transcriptional activation by MyoD. Genes & Dev. 1991. 5. 1377-1386
- ↑ Yang Z, MacQuarrie KL, Analau E, Tyler AE, Dilworth FJ, Cao Y, Diede SJ, Tapscott SJ. MyoD and E-protein heterodimers switch rhabdomyosarcoma cells from an arrested myoblast phase to a differentiated state. Genes Dev. 2009 Mar 15;23(6):694-707. doi: 10.1101/gad.1765109. PMID:19299559 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1765109
- ↑ Micheli L, Leonardi L, Conti F, Maresca G, Colazingari S, Mattei E, Lira SA, Farioli-Vecchioli S, Caruso M, Tirone F. PC4/Tis7/IFRD1 stimulates skeletal muscle regeneration and is involved in myoblast differentiation as a regulator of MyoD and NF-kappaB. J Biol Chem. 2011 Feb 18;286(7):5691-707. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.162842. Epub 2010, Dec 2. PMID:21127072 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.162842
- ↑ Breitschopf K, Bengal E, Ziv T, Admon A, Ciechanover A. A novel site for ubiquitination: the N-terminal residue, and not internal lysines of MyoD, is essential for conjugation and degradation of the protein. EMBO J. 1998 Oct 15;17(20):5964-73. PMID:9774340 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.20.5964
- ↑ Arnold, H. H.; Braun, T. Targeted inactivation of myogenic factor genes reveals their role during mouse myogenesis: a review. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1996. 40. 345-353
