CRISPR-Cas Part II
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<StructureSection load='4qyz' size='450' side='right' scene='74/742625/Cv/4' caption=''> | <StructureSection load='4qyz' size='450' side='right' scene='74/742625/Cv/4' caption=''> | ||
SEE [[CRISPR-Cas|CRISPR-Cas Part I]] | SEE [[CRISPR-Cas|CRISPR-Cas Part I]] | ||
| - | ==CRISPR adaptation (continuation from CRISPR-Cas Part I)== | + | ==CRISPR adaptation (continuation CRISPR adaptation from [[CRISPR-Cas|CRISPR-Cas Part I]])== |
Primed spacer adaptation so far has been demonstrated only in type I systems (50, 65, 66). This priming mechanism constitutes a positive feedback loop that facilitates the acquisition of new spacers from formerly encountered genetic elements (67). Priming can occur even with spacers that contain several mismatches, making them incompetent as guides for targeting the cognate foreign DNA (67). Based on PAM selection, functional spacers are preferentially acquired during naïve adaptation. This initial acquisition event triggers a rapid priming response after subsequent infections. Priming appears to be a major pathway of CRISPR adaptation, at least for some type I systems (65). Primed adaptation strongly depends on the spacer sequence (68), and the acquisition efficiency is highest in close proximity to the priming site. In addition, the orientation of newly inserted spacers indicates a strand bias, which is consistentwith the involvement of singlestranded adaption intermediates (69). According to one proposed model (70), replication forks in the invader’s DNA are blocked by the Cascade complex bound to the priming crRNA, enabling the RecG helicase and the Cas3 helicase/nuclease proteins to attack the DNA. The ends at the collapsed forks then could be targeted by RecBCD, which provides DNA fragments for new spacer generation (70). Given that the use of crRNA for priming has much less strict sequence requirements than direct targeting of the invading DNA, priming is a powerful strategy that might have evolved in the course of the host-parasite arms race to reduce the escape by viral mutants, to provide robust resistance against invading DNA, and to enhance self/nonself discrimination. Naïve as well as primed adaptation in the subtype I-F system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa CRISPR-Cas require both the adaptation and the effector module (69). | Primed spacer adaptation so far has been demonstrated only in type I systems (50, 65, 66). This priming mechanism constitutes a positive feedback loop that facilitates the acquisition of new spacers from formerly encountered genetic elements (67). Priming can occur even with spacers that contain several mismatches, making them incompetent as guides for targeting the cognate foreign DNA (67). Based on PAM selection, functional spacers are preferentially acquired during naïve adaptation. This initial acquisition event triggers a rapid priming response after subsequent infections. Priming appears to be a major pathway of CRISPR adaptation, at least for some type I systems (65). Primed adaptation strongly depends on the spacer sequence (68), and the acquisition efficiency is highest in close proximity to the priming site. In addition, the orientation of newly inserted spacers indicates a strand bias, which is consistentwith the involvement of singlestranded adaption intermediates (69). According to one proposed model (70), replication forks in the invader’s DNA are blocked by the Cascade complex bound to the priming crRNA, enabling the RecG helicase and the Cas3 helicase/nuclease proteins to attack the DNA. The ends at the collapsed forks then could be targeted by RecBCD, which provides DNA fragments for new spacer generation (70). Given that the use of crRNA for priming has much less strict sequence requirements than direct targeting of the invading DNA, priming is a powerful strategy that might have evolved in the course of the host-parasite arms race to reduce the escape by viral mutants, to provide robust resistance against invading DNA, and to enhance self/nonself discrimination. Naïve as well as primed adaptation in the subtype I-F system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa CRISPR-Cas require both the adaptation and the effector module (69). | ||
Revision as of 10:01, 18 December 2016
| |||||||||||
References
- ↑ Hochstrasser ML, Doudna JA. Cutting it close: CRISPR-associated endoribonuclease structure and function. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015 Jan;40(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.007. Epub, 2014 Nov 18. PMID:25468820 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.007
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Mohanraju P, Makarova KS, Zetsche B, Zhang F, Koonin EV, van der Oost J. Diverse evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Science. 2016 Aug 5;353(6299):aad5147. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5147. PMID:27493190 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5147
Categories: Topic Page | Crispr | Crispr-associated | Endonuclease | Cas9 | Cas6
