This old version of Proteopedia is provided for student assignments while the new version is undergoing repairs. Content and edits done in this old version of Proteopedia after March 1, 2026 will eventually be lost when it is retired in about June of 2026.


Apply for new accounts at the new Proteopedia. Your logins will work in both the old and new versions.


Journal:Genes:1

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
<hr/>
<hr/>
<b>Molecular Tour</b><br>
<b>Molecular Tour</b><br>
 +
We observe significant structural differences between DNA in complexes with transcription factors and with histone proteins. To analyze these two types of structures, we used the DNA structural alphabet called CANA, which we had developed earlier by analysis of hundreds of crystal structures containing DNA molecules <ref>pmid 27150812</ref>. The structural alphabet allows to "translate" a three-dimensional (spatial, 3D) structure of DNA building blocks called dinucleotides into a series of letters. Each letter then represents the structure of a dinucleotide and a chain of these letters can be analyzed as a "word" representing the whole 3D DNA structure. The process of translation of a 3D structure to the alphabet letters can be performed at the web server dnatco.org.
 +
 +
Different patterns of the CANA letters observed in complexes with transcription factors and with histone proteins can be interpreted as features discriminating the specific of DNA to transcription factors from non-specific binding to histone proteins. Especially noteworthy is the role of two DNA structural forms, so called A-DNA and BII-DNA ("B-two-DNA"), which are described by the CANA letters AAA and BB2. The AAA structures are found quite frequently in DNA specifically bound to transcription factors at regions where the DNA duplex bends around the protein. AAA is avoided in non-specific complexes with histone proteins, where BB2 plays the essential role: the wrapping of the DNA duplex around the histone proteins can be explained by the periodic occurrence of the CANA letter BB2 every 10.3 steps along the DNA strand.
 +
 +
A high incidence of untypical conformers (e.g. the CANA letter miB and NAN) and a lower occurrence of the most typical DNA structure type called BI-DNA in DNA regions not bound to proteins indicates that the tools crystallographers use to refine DNA structures from diffraction data need to be improved by the combined use of the best geometrical restraints provided by the CANA alphabet and the electron density maps.
 +
 +
In summary, we showed that plasticity of the DNA double helix can be described by the DNA structural alphabet, and characterized different binding strategies of DNA sequences specifically recognized by regulatory proteins and bound non specifically to the histone proteins.
</StructureSection>
</StructureSection>

Revision as of 11:10, 12 December 2017

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate
  1. Schneider B, Bozikova P, Cech P, Svozil D, Cerny J. A DNA Structural Alphabet Distinguishes Structural Features of DNA Bound to Regulatory Proteins and in the Nucleosome Core Particle. Genes (Basel). 2017 Oct 18;8(10). pii: genes8100278. doi: 10.3390/genes8100278. PMID:29057824 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes8100278
  2. Cerny J, Bozikova P, Schneider B. DNATCO: assignment of DNA conformers at dnatco.org. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W284-7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw381. Epub 2016, May 5. PMID:27150812 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw381

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Alexander Berchansky, Jiri Cerny, Jaime Prilusky

This page complements a publication in scientific journals and is one of the Proteopedia's Interactive 3D Complement pages. For aditional details please see I3DC.
Personal tools