| Structural highlights
Disease
[MDM2_HUMAN] Note=Seems to be amplified in certain tumors (including soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas and gliomas). A higher frequency of splice variants lacking p53 binding domain sequences was found in late-stage and high-grade ovarian and bladder carcinomas. Four of the splice variants show loss of p53 binding.
Function
[MDM2_HUMAN] E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that mediates ubiquitination of p53/TP53, leading to its degradation by the proteasome. Inhibits p53/TP53- and p73/TP73-mediated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by binding its transcriptional activation domain. Also acts as an ubiquitin ligase E3 toward itself and ARRB1. Permits the nuclear export of p53/TP53. Promotes proteasome-dependent ubiquitin-independent degradation of retinoblastoma RB1 protein. Inhibits DAXX-mediated apoptosis by inducing its ubiquitination and degradation. Component of the TRIM28/KAP1-MDM2-p53/TP53 complex involved in stabilizing p53/TP53. Also component of the TRIM28/KAP1-ERBB4-MDM2 complex which links growth factor and DNA damage response pathways. Mediates ubiquitination and subsequent proteasome degradation of DYRK2 in nucleus. Ubiquitinates IGF1R and promotes it to proteasomal degradation.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
Publication Abstract from PubMed
Protein flexibility poses a major challenge in binding site identification. Several computational pocket detection methods that utilize small-molecule probes in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been developed to address this issue. Although they have proven hugely successful at reproducing experimental structural data, their ability to predict new binding sites that are yet to be identified and characterized has not been demonstrated. Here, we report the use of benzenes as probe molecules in ligand-mapping MD (LMMD) simulations to predict the existence of two novel binding sites on the surface of the oncoprotein MDM2. One of them was serendipitously confirmed by biophysical assays and X-ray crystallography to be important for the binding of a new family of hydrocarbon stapled peptides that were specifically designed to target the other putative site. These results highlight the predictive power of LMMD and suggest that predictions derived from LMMD simulations can serve as a reliable basis for the identification of novel ligand binding sites in structure-based drug design.
Benzene Probes in Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal Novel Binding Sites for Ligand Design.,Tan YS, Reeks J, Brown CJ, Thean D, Ferrer Gago FJ, Yuen TY, Goh ET, Lee XE, Jennings CE, Joseph TL, Lakshminarayanan R, Lane DP, Noble ME, Verma CS J Phys Chem Lett. 2016 Sep 1;7(17):3452-7. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01525. Epub, 2016 Aug 22. PMID:27532490[12]
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
See Also
References
- ↑ Girnita L, Girnita A, Larsson O. Mdm2-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8247-52. Epub 2003 Jun 23. PMID:12821780 doi:10.1073/pnas.1431613100
- ↑ Li M, Brooks CL, Kon N, Gu W. A dynamic role of HAUSP in the p53-Mdm2 pathway. Mol Cell. 2004 Mar 26;13(6):879-86. PMID:15053880
- ↑ Bernardi R, Scaglioni PP, Bergmann S, Horn HF, Vousden KH, Pandolfi PP. PML regulates p53 stability by sequestering Mdm2 to the nucleolus. Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Jul;6(7):665-72. Epub 2004 Jun 13. PMID:15195100 doi:10.1038/ncb1147
- ↑ Sdek P, Ying H, Chang DL, Qiu W, Zheng H, Touitou R, Allday MJ, Xiao ZX. MDM2 promotes proteasome-dependent ubiquitin-independent degradation of retinoblastoma protein. Mol Cell. 2005 Dec 9;20(5):699-708. PMID:16337594 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.017
- ↑ Brady M, Vlatkovic N, Boyd MT. Regulation of p53 and MDM2 activity by MTBP. Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Jan;25(2):545-53. PMID:15632057 doi:25/2/545
- ↑ Stevenson LF, Sparks A, Allende-Vega N, Xirodimas DP, Lane DP, Saville MK. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP2a regulates the p53 pathway by targeting Mdm2. EMBO J. 2007 Feb 21;26(4):976-86. Epub 2007 Feb 8. PMID:17290220 doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601567
- ↑ Chen D, Zhang J, Li M, Rayburn ER, Wang H, Zhang R. RYBP stabilizes p53 by modulating MDM2. EMBO Rep. 2009 Feb;10(2):166-72. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.231. Epub 2008 Dec 19. PMID:19098711 doi:10.1038/embor.2008.231
- ↑ Busso CS, Iwakuma T, Izumi T. Ubiquitination of mammalian AP endonuclease (APE1) regulated by the p53-MDM2 signaling pathway. Oncogene. 2009 Apr 2;28(13):1616-25. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.5. Epub 2009 Feb 16. PMID:19219073 doi:10.1038/onc.2009.5
- ↑ Taira N, Yamamoto H, Yamaguchi T, Miki Y, Yoshida K. ATM augments nuclear stabilization of DYRK2 by inhibiting MDM2 in the apoptotic response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 2010 Feb 12;285(7):4909-19. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.042341. Epub 2009 , Dec 4. PMID:19965871 doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.042341
- ↑ Gilmore-Hebert M, Ramabhadran R, Stern DF. Interactions of ErbB4 and Kap1 connect the growth factor and DNA damage response pathways. Mol Cancer Res. 2010 Oct;8(10):1388-98. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0042. Epub , 2010 Sep 21. PMID:20858735 doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0042
- ↑ Fu X, Yucer N, Liu S, Li M, Yi P, Mu JJ, Yang T, Chu J, Jung SY, O'Malley BW, Gu W, Qin J, Wang Y. RFWD3-Mdm2 ubiquitin ligase complex positively regulates p53 stability in response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 9;107(10):4579-84. doi:, 10.1073/pnas.0912094107. Epub 2010 Feb 19. PMID:20173098 doi:10.1073/pnas.0912094107
- ↑ Tan YS, Reeks J, Brown CJ, Thean D, Ferrer Gago FJ, Yuen TY, Goh ET, Lee XE, Jennings CE, Joseph TL, Lakshminarayanan R, Lane DP, Noble ME, Verma CS. Benzene Probes in Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal Novel Binding Sites for Ligand Design. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016 Sep 1;7(17):3452-7. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01525. Epub, 2016 Aug 22. PMID:27532490 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01525
|
