Journal:IUCrJ:S2052252520001840
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)

Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*<scene name='83/835837/Cv/10'>Interface 1</scene> | *<scene name='83/835837/Cv/10'>Interface 1</scene> | ||
*<scene name='83/835837/Cv/9'>Interface 2</scene>. | *<scene name='83/835837/Cv/9'>Interface 2</scene>. | ||
- | Interestingly, the rigid <scene name='83/835837/Cv/10'>interface 1</scene> included a <scene name='83/835837/Cv/ | + | Interestingly, the rigid <scene name='83/835837/Cv/10'>interface 1</scene> included a <scene name='83/835837/Cv/11'>D231(MICU1)-R352(MICU2) salt bridge</scene>, and D231 is a highly conserved residue for Ca<sup>2+</sup> coordination in MICU1 EF-hand 1. Thus, MICU1 EF-hand 1 can bind calcium when the salt bridge dissociates. The tight interaction in apo state of MICU1-MICU2 might hinder the conformational changes required for the Ca<sup>2+</sup> binding, resulting in a lower Ca<sup>2+</sup> binding affinity in the MICU1-MICU2 heterodimer as compared to that of MICU1 homodimer. |
<b>References</b><br> | <b>References</b><br> |
Revision as of 18:39, 24 February 2020
|
This page complements a publication in scientific journals and is one of the Proteopedia's Interactive 3D Complement pages. For aditional details please see I3DC.