Sandbox Reserved 1600
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Because there is no proton pump present, the most likely proton transfer mechanism is facilitated by intracellular water molecules. | Because there is no proton pump present, the most likely proton transfer mechanism is facilitated by intracellular water molecules. | ||
| - | One potential proton pathway is formed from the four-helix bundle (a1-4) of CydA. It is called the <scene name='83/838655/Bdoxidase_cyda_pathway/3'>CydA pathway</scene>. The location of Glu108 in our structure, together with previous mutagenesis experiments supports the proposal that this glutamate residue is a redox state-dependent mediator of proton transfer to a charge compensation site. <ref name=”Safarian” | + | One potential proton pathway is formed from the four-helix bundle (a1-4) of CydA. It is called the <scene name='83/838655/Bdoxidase_cyda_pathway/3'>CydA pathway</scene>. The location of Glu108 in our structure, together with previous mutagenesis experiments supports the proposal that this glutamate residue is a redox state-dependent mediator of proton transfer to a charge compensation site. <ref name =”Safarian” /> With the CydA pathway leading to Glu101, this residue could be the protonatable group used for charge compensation upon heme b595 reduction. It is still unknown whether protons entering the CydA pathway can be transferred from Glu101 to Glu378, to allow the spread of the negative charge of a second electron used to reduce the two high-spin hemes. Proto- nation of Glu378 could alternatively also be accomplished by a proton accessing from the extracellular side. More research needs to be done to determine whether the CydA pathway is solely providing protons for charge compensation or whether Glu108 can be a branching point that is able to pass protons via the heme b595 propionates to the oxygen-binding site. |
| - | Another potential entry site is related to the a1-4 four-helix bundle of CydB. Therefore, this is called the <scene name='83/838655/Bdoxidase_cydb_pathway/2'>CydB pathway</scene>. In this pathway, Asp25 is thought to be the equivalent of the Glu108 in the CydA pathway <ref name=”Safarian” | + | Another potential entry site is related to the a1-4 four-helix bundle of CydB. Therefore, this is called the <scene name='83/838655/Bdoxidase_cydb_pathway/2'>CydB pathway</scene>. In this pathway, Asp25 is thought to be the equivalent of the Glu108 in the CydA pathway <ref name =”Safarian” />. The other residues help facilitate the movement of the proton very similarly to the CydA pathway. There is less known about the CydB pathway, and therefore, the CydA pathway is the most accepted source of protons. |
= Structure Similarity to Bd Oxidase found in ''Ecoli'' = | = Structure Similarity to Bd Oxidase found in ''Ecoli'' = | ||
| - | [[Image:Aligmentbdoidase.jpg|200 px|left|thumb|Figure 4. Alignment of bd oxidase for the organisms ''Geobacillus thermodenitrificans'' (blue) and ''Ecoli'' (purple).]] [[Image:Heme alignment.png|200 px|right|thumb|Figure 5. Heme arrangements for the organisms ''Geobacillus thermodenitrificans'' and ''Ecoli''. Heme D (green); Heme B595 and Heme B558 shown in pink]] The structure of Bd Oxidase for ''Geobacillus thermodenitrificans'' is highly similar to the structure of Bd Oxidase for ''Ecoli'' with the only noticeable difference being the length of the Q-loop. The similarity and differences between the two proteins can be seen in the alignment of their main structures (Fig.4). Although only having one noticeable difference in structure, this difference causes the two proteins to have different active sites (Fig. 5). In particular, the <scene name='83/838655/Hemes_ecoli/1'>hemes</scene> of bd oxidase in ''Ecoli'' are arranged differently than the <scene name='83/838655/Hemes/3'>hemes</scene> in ''Geobacillus thermodenitrificans''. The main reason for this change in heme arrangement is because of the oxygen-binding site being <scene name='83/838655/Oxygen_site_ecoli/1'>blocked</scene> in ''Ecoli'', thus causing oxygen to have to bind at a different binding site on the protein. | + | [[Image:Aligmentbdoidase.jpg|200 px|left|thumb|Figure 4. Alignment of bd oxidase for the organisms ''Geobacillus thermodenitrificans'' (blue) and ''Ecoli'' (purple).]] [[Image:Heme alignment.png|200 px|right|thumb|Figure 5. Heme arrangements for the organisms ''Geobacillus thermodenitrificans'' and ''Ecoli''. Heme D (green); Heme B595 and Heme B558 shown in pink]] The structure of Bd Oxidase for ''Geobacillus thermodenitrificans'' is highly similar to the structure of Bd Oxidase for ''Ecoli'' with the only noticeable difference being the length of the Q-loop. <ref name = ”Theßeling”>PMID:31723136</ref> The similarity and differences between the two proteins can be seen in the alignment of their main structures (Fig.4). Although only having one noticeable difference in structure, this difference causes the two proteins to have different active sites (Fig. 5). In particular, the <scene name='83/838655/Hemes_ecoli/1'>hemes</scene> of bd oxidase in ''Ecoli'' are arranged differently than the <scene name='83/838655/Hemes/3'>hemes</scene> in ''Geobacillus thermodenitrificans''. The main reason for this change in heme arrangement is because of the oxygen-binding site being <scene name='83/838655/Oxygen_site_ecoli/1'>blocked</scene> in ''Ecoli'', thus causing oxygen to have to bind at a different binding site on the protein. <ref name = ”Theßeling” /> |
Revision as of 02:12, 7 April 2020
bd oxidase; Geobacillus thermodenitrificans
| |||||||||||
References
- ↑ Giuffre A, Borisov VB, Arese M, Sarti P, Forte E. Cytochrome bd oxidase and bacterial tolerance to oxidative and nitrosative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Jul;1837(7):1178-87. doi:, 10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 31. PMID:24486503 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.01.016
- ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Safarian S, Hahn A, Mills DJ, Radloff M, Eisinger ML, Nikolaev A, Meier-Credo J, Melin F, Miyoshi H, Gennis RB, Sakamoto J, Langer JD, Hellwig P, Kuhlbrandt W, Michel H. Active site rearrangement and structural divergence in prokaryotic respiratory oxidases. Science. 2019 Oct 4;366(6461):100-104. doi: 10.1126/science.aay0967. PMID:31604309 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aay0967
- ↑ Junemann S. Cytochrome bd terminal oxidase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997 Aug 22;1321(2):107-27. doi:, 10.1016/s0005-2728(97)00046-7. PMID:9332500 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0005-2728(97)00046-7
- ↑ Das A, Silaghi-Dumitrescu R, Ljungdahl LG, Kurtz DM Jr. Cytochrome bd oxidase, oxidative stress, and dioxygen tolerance of the strictly anaerobic bacterium Moorella thermoacetica. J Bacteriol. 2005 Mar;187(6):2020-9. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.6.2020-2029.2005. PMID:15743950 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.6.2020-2029.2005
Student Contributors
Emma H Harris Carson E MIddlebrook
