Sandbox Reserved 1601

Overview

Article One ^{[1] [1]} Article Two ^{[2] [2]} Article Three ^{[3] [3]} Article Four ^{[4] [4]} Article Five ^{[5] [5]}

Mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) channels exist in most eukaryotic life, but activity is regulated differently in each clade.^[2] The precise identity of the MCU wasn't discovered until 2011 and was discovered using a combination of NMR spectroscopy, cryo-electron microscopy, and x-ray crystallography.^[3] Identification of the structure was difficult because it has no apparent sequence similarity to other ion channels.^[2] However, like other ion channels, it is incredibly selective and efficient. The MCU has the ability to only allow Ca^2+ ions

Structure

Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter Complex

Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter Structure

Selectivity Filter

Movement of Calcium

Mutations

Medical Relevance

Apoptosis and Cancer

Neurodegenerative Disorders

Diabetes

Regulation and Inhibition

The most well-known and commonly used inhibitor of calcium uptake into the mitochondria is ruthenium red (RuRed). RuRed effectively inhibits calcium uptake without affecting mitochondrial respiration or calcium efflux. Additionally, it has been shown to mitigate tissue damage due to IRI and slow cancer cell migration. The issue with RuRed is that its purification has always been a challenging matter.^[3] Interestingly enough, this led to even more developments in the search for an inhibitor. Many scientists had observed that impure RuRed actually had greater inhibition than pure RuRed. One of the common minor impurities of RuRed, Ru360, was found to be the active component of the RuRed mixtures, meaning it responsible for calcium inhibition. Ru360 is now commercially available and has been widely used for the study of calcium-dependent cellular processes and as a therapeutic agent. Very little is known about its mechanism of inhibtion, but studies show that it interacts with the DXXE motif of the loop connecting the TM1 and TM2 helices.^[3]

Ru360 was a very successful inhibitor, but it showed low cell permeability. So, a new inhibitor called Ru265 was developed which could be easily synthesized and didn't need chromatographic purification. Ru265 had all of the benefits of Ru360, with with twice the cell permeability. Additionally, the same mutations didn't seem to affect it. Mutations of D261 and S259 in human MCU reduced inhibitory effect of Ru360, but not Ru265. Additionally, there were other mutations that affected Ru265, but not Ru360.^[3] This shows how much more research is needed before a mechanism is understood for any inhibitor of the MCU.

This is a sample scene created with SAT to by Group, and another to make of the protein. You can make your own scenes on SAT starting from scratch or loading and editing one of these sample scenes.