Sandbox Reserved 1653
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
==='''CTD and Beam'''=== | ==='''CTD and Beam'''=== | ||
- | CTD and <scene name='86/868186/Beam_1_couleurs/1'>beams</scene> are intracellular. The beam interacts with the CTD, and both are required for mechanical activation of the channel. | + | CTD and <scene name='86/868186/Beam_1_couleurs/1'>beams</scene> are intracellular. The beam interacts with the CTD, and both are required for mechanical activation of the channel.<ref name="architecture"/> |
- | The <scene name='86/868186/Ctd_trimeric/1'>CTD</scene> is a trimeric structure and is a part of the pore module of piezo channel. The CTD interacts with the long <scene name='86/868186/Anchor/1'>anchorα</scene>, and forms a hydrophobic interface. This forms a tripartite interaction with the <scene name='86/868186/E_dans_ctd/1'>glutamate-rich regions of the CTD</scene> | + | The <scene name='86/868186/Ctd_trimeric/1'>CTD</scene> is a trimeric structure and is a part of the pore module of piezo channel. The CTD interacts with the long <scene name='86/868186/Anchor/1'>anchorα</scene>, and forms a hydrophobic interface. This forms a tripartite interaction with the <scene name='86/868186/E_dans_ctd/1'>glutamate-rich regions of the CTD</scene><ref name="mechanogating"> DOI 10.1038/nature25743 </ref> |
It forms an intracellular vestibule along the z-axis, and it is essential for ion permeation properties. More precisely, the pore module of | It forms an intracellular vestibule along the z-axis, and it is essential for ion permeation properties. More precisely, the pore module of | ||
- | Piezo channels comprises the C-terminal region from residues 2172 to 2547. | + | Piezo channels comprises the C-terminal region from residues 2172 to 2547.<ref name="architecture"> DOI 10.1038/nature15247 </ref> The CTD triangular plane has a beam-facing side of the triangular, and it is separated into two surfaces with negative and positive electrostatic potentials.<ref name="mechanogating"/> |
- | The beam is a 90 Å-long intracellular structure in the central region of the ion channel. It is a part of the three-bladed, propeller-shaped architecture characteristic of piezo1. It is a piece of the “beam-CTD-anchor-OH-IH” relaying interface that forms the central pore module. It is because the beam connects the THU, to the CTD and the outer helix (OH) that it enables the transmission of the mechanical force, and thus the opening of piezo1’s pore. | + | The beam is a 90 Å-long intracellular structure in the central region of the ion channel. It is a part of the three-bladed, propeller-shaped architecture characteristic of piezo1. It is a piece of the “beam-CTD-anchor-OH-IH” relaying interface that forms the central pore module. It is because the beam connects the THU, to the CTD and the outer helix (OH) that it enables the transmission of the mechanical force, and thus the opening of piezo1’s pore.<ref name="mechanogating"/> It delivers the mechanical signals from the blades, or the plasma membrane, to the central pore module region.<ref name="structural analysis"> DOI 10.4236/jbm.2019.712012 </ref> |
Indeed, the beams are connected to the transmembrane helical units (THUs), which forms a triangular plane above its proximal end, more precisely to the intracellular surface of THU7–THU9. The THU7-THU8 makes the largest intracellular loop of piezo1. This loop starts at the distal end of the beam, interacts with the CTD, and then folds back to the distal end of the beam before connecting to a transmembrane region. Moreover, the beam crosses through the beam-facing side of the triangular CTD, forming interactions with both CTDα 1 and CTDα 2. | Indeed, the beams are connected to the transmembrane helical units (THUs), which forms a triangular plane above its proximal end, more precisely to the intracellular surface of THU7–THU9. The THU7-THU8 makes the largest intracellular loop of piezo1. This loop starts at the distal end of the beam, interacts with the CTD, and then folds back to the distal end of the beam before connecting to a transmembrane region. Moreover, the beam crosses through the beam-facing side of the triangular CTD, forming interactions with both CTDα 1 and CTDα 2. | ||
This position and connections of the beam render it an ideal structure for mechanical transmission from the distal THUs to the central ion-conducting pore. | This position and connections of the beam render it an ideal structure for mechanical transmission from the distal THUs to the central ion-conducting pore. | ||
- | The lever-like mechanotransduction apparatus constituted by the beam is possible because of its uneven movement. It displays large motion at the distal beam while subtle movement at the proximal end. It enables Piezo channels to effectively convert a large conformational change of the distal blades to a relatively slight opening of the central pore, allowing cation-selective permeation. The L1342 and L1345 residues of the beam act as a pivot to form the lever-like apparatus. <ref name="mechanogating"/> | + | The lever-like mechanotransduction apparatus constituted by the beam is possible because of its uneven movement. It displays large motion at the distal beam while subtle movement at the proximal end. It enables Piezo channels to effectively convert a large conformational change of the distal blades to a relatively slight opening of the central pore, allowing cation-selective permeation. The L1342 and L1345 residues of the beam act as a pivot to form the lever-like apparatus.<ref name="mechanogating"/> |
==='''CED or cap'''=== | ==='''CED or cap'''=== |
Revision as of 21:28, 9 January 2021
|
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Zhao Q, Wu K, Geng J, Chi S, Wang Y, Zhi P, Zhang M, Xiao B. Ion Permeation and Mechanotransduction Mechanisms of Mechanosensitive Piezo Channels. Neuron. 2016 Mar 16;89(6):1248-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.046. Epub 2016, Feb 25. PMID:26924440 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.046
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Parpaite T, Coste B. Piezo channels. Curr Biol. 2017 Apr 3;27(7):R250-R252. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.048. PMID:28376327 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.048
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Wei L, Mousawi F, Li D, Roger S, Li J, Yang X, Jiang LH. Adenosine Triphosphate Release and P2 Receptor Signaling in Piezo1 Channel-Dependent Mechanoregulation. Front Pharmacol. 2019 Nov 6;10:1304. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01304. eCollection, 2019. PMID:31780935 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01304
- ↑ Lin YC, Guo YR, Miyagi A, Levring J, MacKinnon R, Scheuring S. Force-induced conformational changes in PIEZO1. Nature. 2019 Sep;573(7773):230-234. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1499-2. Epub 2019 Aug, 21. PMID:31435018 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1499-2
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Zhou, Z. (2019). Structural Analysis of Piezo1 Ion Channel Reveals the Relationship between Amino Acid Sequence Mutations and Human Diseases. 139–155. DOI 10.4236/jbm.2019.712012
- ↑ Zhao Q, Zhou H, Chi S, Wang Y, Wang J, Geng J, Wu K, Liu W, Zhang T, Dong MQ, Wang J, Li X, Xiao B. Structure and mechanogating mechanism of the Piezo1 channel. Nature. 2018 Feb 22;554(7693):487-492. doi: 10.1038/nature25743. Epub 2018 Jan, 22. PMID:29469092 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature25743
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Liang X, Howard J. Structural Biology: Piezo Senses Tension through Curvature. Curr Biol. 2018 Apr 23;28(8):R357-R359. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.078. PMID:29689211 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.078
- ↑ Guo YR, MacKinnon R. Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity. Elife. 2017 Dec 12;6. pii: 33660. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33660. PMID:29231809 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33660
- ↑ Guo YR, MacKinnon R. Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity. Elife. 2017 Dec 12;6. pii: 33660. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33660. PMID:29231809 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33660
- ↑ Lin YC, Guo YR, Miyagi A, Levring J, MacKinnon R, Scheuring S. Force-induced conformational changes in PIEZO1. Nature. 2019 Sep;573(7773):230-234. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1499-2. Epub 2019 Aug, 21. PMID:31435018 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1499-2
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Ge J, Li W, Zhao Q, Li N, Chen M, Zhi P, Li R, Gao N, Xiao B, Yang M. Architecture of the mammalian mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nature. 2015 Nov 5;527(7576):64-9. doi: 10.1038/nature15247. Epub 2015 Sep 21. PMID:26390154 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature15247
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Zhao Q, Zhou H, Chi S, Wang Y, Wang J, Geng J, Wu K, Liu W, Zhang T, Dong MQ, Wang J, Li X, Xiao B. Structure and mechanogating mechanism of the Piezo1 channel. Nature. 2018 Feb 22;554(7693):487-492. doi: 10.1038/nature25743. Epub 2018 Jan, 22. PMID:29469092 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature25743
- ↑ doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2019.712012
- ↑ Ge J, Li W, Zhao Q, Li N, Chen M, Zhi P, Li R, Gao N, Xiao B, Yang M. Architecture of the mammalian mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nature. 2015 Nov 5;527(7576):64-9. doi: 10.1038/nature15247. Epub 2015 Sep 21. PMID:26390154 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature15247