Sandbox Reserved 1701

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 25: Line 25:
=== G-Protein ===
=== G-Protein ===
-
[https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/G_protein GTP-binding proteins], also known as G-proteins, are heterotrimeric complexes consisting of <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_alpha/2'>alpha</scene>, <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_beta/2'>beta</scene>, and <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_gamma/2'>gamma</scene> subunits that interact with the intracellular transmembrane region at an <scene name='90/904306/Interface_2/2'>interface</scene> ( '''Figure 2b'''). G-proteins are responsible for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_transduction transmitting] extracellular signals into the cell upon activation. Activation leads to a substitution of GDP with GTP within the alpha subunit, causing the alpha subunit to disassociate from the beta and gamma subunits to initiate an intracellular signaling cascade. There are different families of G-alpha subunits, Gαi, Gαs, Gα12/13, and Gαq <ref name="Kamato">PMID: 26664886</ref>. MRGPRX2 binds to both Gαi and Gαq subunits with nearly identical structures despite slightly different amino acids present ( '''Figure 2a''') <ref name= "Cao" /> <ref name= "Yang" />. Throughout this page, MGPRX2 is always shown with Gq. The major difference between the Gq and Gi bound structures comes from one amino acid difference (valine on Gq versus phenylalanine on Gi) that pushes the Gi subunit 2Å away from the arginine residue on helix 6 of the transmembrane protein.
+
[https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/G_protein GTP-binding proteins], also known as G-proteins, are heterotrimeric complexes consisting of <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_alpha/2'>alpha</scene>, <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_beta/2'>beta</scene>, and <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_gamma/2'>gamma</scene> subunits that interact with the intracellular transmembrane region at an <scene name='90/904306/Interface_2/2'>interface</scene> ('''Figure 2b'''). G-proteins are responsible for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_transduction transmitting] extracellular signals into the cell upon activation. Activation leads to a substitution of GDP with GTP within the alpha subunit, causing the alpha subunit to disassociate from the beta and gamma subunits to initiate an intracellular signaling cascade. There are different families of G-alpha subunits, Gαi, Gαs, Gα12/13, and Gαq <ref name="Kamato">PMID: 26664886</ref>. MRGPRX2 binds to both Gαi and Gαq subunits with nearly identical structures despite slightly different amino acids present ('''Figure 2a''') <ref name= "Cao" /> <ref name= "Yang" />. Throughout this page, MGPRX2 is always shown with Gq. The major difference between the Gq and Gi bound structures comes from one amino acid difference (valine on Gq versus phenylalanine on Gi) that pushes the Gi subunit 2Å away from the arginine residue on helix 6 of the transmembrane protein.
[[Image:Gq and gi overlay.png|500px|center|thumb|'''Figure 2a.''' Overlay of MGPRX2-Gq (red-dark blue) and MGPRX2-Gi (cyan-yellow). '''Figure 2b.''' Important residues involved in the interface between MGPRX2 and Gq/ Gi subunits. Arrow pointing to the major difference between the interfaces, which comes from the final C-terminus residue on the G-alpha subunit. In Gq, there is a valine while in Gi, there is a phenylalanine. This pushes the Gi subunit 2Å away from the arginine residue on helix 6 of the transmembrane protein. All other interactions are nearly identical. PDBs: (MRGPRX2-Gq):7s8l and (MRGPRX2-Gi):7s8m]]
[[Image:Gq and gi overlay.png|500px|center|thumb|'''Figure 2a.''' Overlay of MGPRX2-Gq (red-dark blue) and MGPRX2-Gi (cyan-yellow). '''Figure 2b.''' Important residues involved in the interface between MGPRX2 and Gq/ Gi subunits. Arrow pointing to the major difference between the interfaces, which comes from the final C-terminus residue on the G-alpha subunit. In Gq, there is a valine while in Gi, there is a phenylalanine. This pushes the Gi subunit 2Å away from the arginine residue on helix 6 of the transmembrane protein. All other interactions are nearly identical. PDBs: (MRGPRX2-Gq):7s8l and (MRGPRX2-Gi):7s8m]]
Line 47: Line 47:
==== Sodium Site ====
==== Sodium Site ====
-
The allosteric sodium site in class A GPCRs has been characterized as important in inactive state GPCR stabilization <ref name="Katritch">PMID:24767681</ref>. Katritch et al <ref name="Katritch">PMID:24767681</ref> describe that class A GPCRs lacking conserved D2.50 and other polar residues within the sodium pocket are typically inactive. The MRGPRX2 <scene name='90/904306/Sodium_site_2/2'>sodium binding site</scene> consists of conserved D2.50, or ASP-75, and GLY-116 <scene name='90/904306/Alignment_sodium/1'>compared to 5HT2AR</scene> and to the [https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/Neurotensin_receptor#sodium%20binding%20pocket previously conserved] polar residues in the neurotensin receptor binding pocket such as S3.39. Other class A GPCRs demonstrate a larger sodium binding pocket with a higher negative character allowing for a suitable environment for sodium ions to bind. In MRGPRX2, this sodium binding pocket lacks the same amount of <scene name='90/904306/Sodium_site_charge/3'>negative character</scene> with the shift to a glycine residue rather than serine. However, evidence suggests that sodium is still able to bind in X2's sodium binding site even with fewer conserved residues.
+
The allosteric sodium site in class A GPCRs has been characterized as important in inactive state GPCR stabilization <ref name="Katritch">PMID:24767681</ref>. Katritch et al <ref name="Katritch">PMID:24767681</ref> describe that class A GPCRs lacking conserved D2.50 and other polar residues within the sodium pocket are typically inactive. The MRGPRX2 <scene name='90/904306/Sodium_site_2/2'>sodium binding site</scene> consists of conserved Asp2.50, or Asp-75, and Gly-116 <scene name='90/904306/Alignment_sodium/1'>compared to 5HT2AR</scene> and to the [https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/Neurotensin_receptor#sodium%20binding%20pocket previously conserved] polar residues in the neurotensin receptor binding pocket such as Ser3.39. Other class A GPCRs demonstrate a larger sodium binding pocket with a higher negative character allowing for a suitable environment for sodium ions to bind. In MRGPRX2, this sodium binding pocket lacks the same amount of <scene name='90/904306/Sodium_site_charge/3'>negative character</scene> with the shift to a glycine residue rather than serine. However, evidence suggests that sodium is still able to bind in X2's sodium binding site even with fewer conserved residues.
==== PIF/LLF Motif ====
==== PIF/LLF Motif ====
Line 65: Line 65:
==== DRY/ ERC Motif ====
==== DRY/ ERC Motif ====
[[Image:Screen Shot 2022-03-15 at 10.23.20 AM.png|200px|left|thumb|'''Figure 4.''' ERC Motif of MRGPRX2 with key residues shown as ball and stick. PDB: 7s8l.]]
[[Image:Screen Shot 2022-03-15 at 10.23.20 AM.png|200px|left|thumb|'''Figure 4.''' ERC Motif of MRGPRX2 with key residues shown as ball and stick. PDB: 7s8l.]]
-
The E/DRY motif in most class A GPCRs is responsible for forming salt bridges with surrounding residues and TM6<ref name="Rovati">PMID: 17192495</ref>. These salt bridges maintain the inactive conformation of the receptor until ligand binding breaks the ionic "lock" from these interactions. MRGPRX2 has an ERC motif <scene name='90/904306/Alignment_erc/2'>rather than</scene> the typically [https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/A_Physical_Model_of_the_%CE%B22-Adrenergic_Receptor#conserved%20DRY%20motif conserved E/DRY Motif] in other class A GPCRs such as 5HT2AR and the adrenergic receptor. The amino acid residue shift from TYR-174 to CYS-128 allows compaction of the helices in MRGPRX2 where the standard TYR physically pushes the TMD helices apart('''Figure 4'''). The conserved residues E and R still form salt bridges with nearby residues. This and the closer packing of the helices contribute to a less significant TMD conformational change upon ligand binding ('''Figure 10''').
+
The E/DRY motif in most class A GPCRs is responsible for forming salt bridges with surrounding residues and TM6<ref name="Rovati">PMID: 17192495</ref>. These salt bridges maintain the inactive conformation of the receptor until ligand binding breaks the ionic "lock" from these interactions. MRGPRX2 has an ERC motif <scene name='90/904306/Alignment_erc/2'>rather than</scene> the typically [https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/A_Physical_Model_of_the_%CE%B22-Adrenergic_Receptor#conserved%20DRY%20motif conserved E/DRY Motif] in other class A GPCRs such as 5HT2AR and the adrenergic receptor. The amino acid residue shift from Tyr-174 to Cys-128 allows compaction of the helices in MRGPRX2 where the standard Tyr physically pushes the TMD helices apart ('''Figure 4'''). The conserved residues Glu and Arg still form salt bridges with nearby residues. This and the closer packing of the helices contribute to a less significant TMD conformational change upon ligand binding ('''Figure 10''').
Line 83: Line 83:
=====NPxxY Motif=====
=====NPxxY Motif=====
-
The residues in the <scene name='90/904306/Npxxy_motif/5'>NPxxY motif</scene> are pivotal for receptor activation in all Class A GPCRs. This motif is conserved in the MRGPRX2 receptor with residues VAL-231, ASP-75, ASN-275, and TYR-279.
+
The residues in the <scene name='90/904306/Npxxy_motif/5'>NPxxY motif</scene> are pivotal for receptor activation in all Class A GPCRs. This motif is conserved in the MRGPRX2 receptor with residues Val-231, Asp-75, Asn-275, and Tyr-279.
=====CWxP Motif=====
=====CWxP Motif=====
-
The <scene name='90/904306/Cpxw_motif_2/2'>CWxP motif</scene> is almost fully conserved except for TRP-236, or the toggle switch, which is replaced with GLY-236. CYS-235, LEU-237, and PRO-238 are all conserved. CYS6.47 may play a fundamental role in GPCR activity by participating in the rearrangement of TM6 and TM7 upon receptor activation<ref name="Olivella>PMID:23497259</ref>. This residue's role is supported by its conservation in MRGPRX2 as it is a functional GPCR.
+
The <scene name='90/904306/Cpxw_motif_2/2'>CWxP motif</scene> is almost fully conserved except for Trp-236, or the toggle switch, which is replaced with Gly-236. Cys-235, Leu-237, and Pro-238 are all conserved. CYS6.47 may play a fundamental role in GPCR activity by participating in the rearrangement of TM6 and TM7 upon receptor activation<ref name="Olivella>PMID:23497259</ref>. This residue's role is supported by its conservation in MRGPRX2 as it is a functional GPCR.
=== Ligands ===
=== Ligands ===

Revision as of 01:04, 19 April 2022

MRGPRX2 Human Itch G-Protein Coupled Receptor (GPCR)

Mas-Related G-Protein Coupled Receptor (MRGPRX2) visualized by X-ray crystallography. The transmembrane domain (red) contains 7 transmembrane helices, and the G-protein consists of 3 different domains: alpha (blue), beta (magenta), and gamma (yellow). PDB:7s8l

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

References

  1. Tuteja N. Signaling through G protein coupled receptors. Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Oct;4(10):942-7. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.10.9530. Epub 2009, Oct 14. PMID:19826234 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.10.9530
  2. Hauser AS, Attwood MM, Rask-Andersen M, Schioth HB, Gloriam DE. Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 Dec;16(12):829-842. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.178. Epub, 2017 Oct 27. PMID:29075003 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.178
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Porebski G, Kwiecien K, Pawica M, Kwitniewski M. Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptor-X2 (MRGPRX2) in Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. Front Immunol. 2018 Dec 20;9:3027. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03027. eCollection, 2018. PMID:30619367 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03027
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Dondalska A, Ronnberg E, Ma H, Palsson SA, Magnusdottir E, Gao T, Adam L, Lerner EA, Nilsson G, Lagerstrom M, Spetz AL. Amelioration of Compound 48/80-Mediated Itch and LL-37-Induced Inflammation by a Single-Stranded Oligonucleotide. Front Immunol. 2020 Sep 30;11:559589. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.559589. eCollection, 2020. PMID:33101278 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.559589
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 McNeil BD, Pundir P, Meeker S, Han L, Undem BJ, Kulka M, Dong X. Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions. Nature. 2015 Mar 12;519(7542):237-41. doi: 10.1038/nature14022. Epub 2014 Dec 17. PMID:25517090 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14022
  6. 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 Cao C, Kang HJ, Singh I, Chen H, Zhang C, Ye W, Hayes BW, Liu J, Gumpper RH, Bender BJ, Slocum ST, Krumm BE, Lansu K, McCorvy JD, Kroeze WK, English JG, DiBerto JF, Olsen RHJ, Huang XP, Zhang S, Liu Y, Kim K, Karpiak J, Jan LY, Abraham SN, Jin J, Shoichet BK, Fay JF, Roth BL. Structure, function and pharmacology of human itch GPCRs. Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7887):170-175. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04126-6. Epub 2021, Nov 17. PMID:34789874 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04126-6
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 Yang F, Guo L, Li Y, Wang G, Wang J, Zhang C, Fang GX, Chen X, Liu L, Yan X, Liu Q, Qu C, Xu Y, Xiao P, Zhu Z, Li Z, Zhou J, Yu X, Gao N, Sun JP. Structure, function and pharmacology of human itch receptor complexes. Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7887):164-169. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04077-y. Epub 2021, Nov 17. PMID:34789875 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04077-y
  8. Yu H, Zhao T, Liu S, Wu Q, Johnson O, Wu Z, Zhuang Z, Shi Y, Peng L, He R, Yang Y, Sun J, Wang X, Xu H, Zeng Z, Zou P, Lei X, Luo W, Li Y. MRGPRX4 is a bile acid receptor for human cholestatic itch. Elife. 2019 Sep 10;8. pii: 48431. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48431. PMID:31500698 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48431
  9. Kamato D, Thach L, Bernard R, Chan V, Zheng W, Kaur H, Brimble M, Osman N, Little PJ. Structure, Function, Pharmacology, and Therapeutic Potential of the G Protein, Galpha/q,11. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Mar 24;2:14. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2015.00014. eCollection, 2015. PMID:26664886 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2015.00014
  10. Trzaskowski B, Latek D, Yuan S, Ghoshdastider U, Debinski A, Filipek S. Action of molecular switches in GPCRs--theoretical and experimental studies. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(8):1090-109. doi: 10.2174/092986712799320556. PMID:22300046 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986712799320556
  11. 11.0 11.1 Katritch V, Fenalti G, Abola EE, Roth BL, Cherezov V, Stevens RC. Allosteric sodium in class A GPCR signaling. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014 May;39(5):233-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.03.002. Epub , 2014 Apr 21. PMID:24767681 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.03.002
  12. Rovati GE, Capra V, Neubig RR. The highly conserved DRY motif of class A G protein-coupled receptors: beyond the ground state. Mol Pharmacol. 2007 Apr;71(4):959-64. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.029470. Epub 2006 Dec , 27. PMID:17192495 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.106.029470
  13. Naranjo AN, Chevalier A, Cousins GD, Ayettey E, McCusker EC, Wenk C, Robinson AS. Conserved disulfide bond is not essential for the adenosine A2A receptor: Extracellular cysteines influence receptor distribution within the cell and ligand-binding recognition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Feb;1848(2):603-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.11.010., Epub 2014 Nov 16. PMID:25445670 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.11.010
  14. Olivella M, Caltabiano G, Cordomi A. The role of Cysteine 6.47 in class A GPCRs. BMC Struct Biol. 2013 Mar 15;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-13-3. PMID:23497259 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-13-3
  15. Hoffmann C, Zurn A, Bunemann M, Lohse MJ. Conformational changes in G-protein-coupled receptors-the quest for functionally selective conformations is open. Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;153 Suppl 1:S358-66. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707615. Epub, 2007 Dec 3. PMID:18059316 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707615
  16. Navines-Ferrer A, Serrano-Candelas E, Lafuente A, Munoz-Cano R, Martin M, Gastaminza G. MRGPRX2-mediated mast cell response to drugs used in perioperative procedures and anaesthesia. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 2;8(1):11628. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29965-8. PMID:30072729 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29965-8
  17. Gonzalez-Rey E, Chorny A, Robledo G, Delgado M. Cortistatin, a new antiinflammatory peptide with therapeutic effect on lethal endotoxemia. J Exp Med. 2006 Mar 20;203(3):563-71. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052017. Epub 2006 Feb, 21. PMID:16492802 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20052017
Personal tools