Neurofibromin
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[Image:greenTriad.png|200 px|thumb|Figure 2. Triad of Residues that keep Neurofibromin in the Closed Conformation.]] | [[Image:greenTriad.png|200 px|thumb|Figure 2. Triad of Residues that keep Neurofibromin in the Closed Conformation.]] | ||
=====Open Conformation===== | =====Open Conformation===== | ||
- | The <scene name='90/904326/Open/1'>open state</scene> of neurofibromin has one protomer in a open conformation and the other in a closed conformation. The protomer in the open conformation allows for the binding of Ras because of reorientation of the GRD and Sec14-PH domains. In the open conformation, the metal binding site found in the closed conformation is lost due to separation of the N-HEAT/ARM and the cysteine residue from the histidine residues founds in the GRD-Sec14-PH linker. The loss of the metal binding site allows for Ras to bind to the Gap-related domain due to the loss of steric hinderance. | + | The <scene name='90/904326/Open/1'>open state</scene> of neurofibromin has one protomer in a open conformation and the other in a closed conformation. The protomer in the open conformation allows for the binding of Ras because of reorientation of the GRD and Sec14-PH domains. In the open conformation, the metal binding site found in the closed conformation is lost due to separation of the N-HEAT/ARM and the cysteine residue from the histidine residues founds in the GRD-Sec14-PH linker. The loss of the metal binding site in one of the monomers allows for Ras to bind to the Gap-related domain due to the loss of steric hinderance. |
=====Transition Between Open and Closed Conformation===== | =====Transition Between Open and Closed Conformation===== | ||
In the transition from the closed state to the open state, several of the domains of neurofibromin rotate to make the binding site of neurofibromin more accessible . This rotation is able to occur due to the rotation of three connective linkers, L1, L2, and L3. <scene name='90/904326/L1/1'>L1</scene> is located between an alpha helix 48 in N-HEAT and an alpha helix 49 in GRD. G1190 is a potential hinge point when L1 rotates and pushes the alpha helices outwards to move the Gap-related domain. <scene name='90/904326/L3/1'>L3</scene> is located between the Sec14-PH domain and the C-HEAT/ARM and aids in the movement of the Sec14-PH domain. The proximity of L1 and L3 has to be close to facilitate the rotation of the domains. <scene name='90/904326/L2/1'>L2</scene> starts at the last helix in the Gap-related domain and extends to the Sec14-PH domain. Its primary role is to move the Sec14-PH domain away from the GRD. Without these rotations, the membrane binding sites are occluded and inaccessible. <ref name="Naschberger"/> | In the transition from the closed state to the open state, several of the domains of neurofibromin rotate to make the binding site of neurofibromin more accessible . This rotation is able to occur due to the rotation of three connective linkers, L1, L2, and L3. <scene name='90/904326/L1/1'>L1</scene> is located between an alpha helix 48 in N-HEAT and an alpha helix 49 in GRD. G1190 is a potential hinge point when L1 rotates and pushes the alpha helices outwards to move the Gap-related domain. <scene name='90/904326/L3/1'>L3</scene> is located between the Sec14-PH domain and the C-HEAT/ARM and aids in the movement of the Sec14-PH domain. The proximity of L1 and L3 has to be close to facilitate the rotation of the domains. <scene name='90/904326/L2/1'>L2</scene> starts at the last helix in the Gap-related domain and extends to the Sec14-PH domain. Its primary role is to move the Sec14-PH domain away from the GRD. Without these rotations, the membrane binding sites are occluded and inaccessible. <ref name="Naschberger"/> |
Revision as of 12:40, 21 April 2022
|
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Bergoug M, Doudeau M, Godin F, Mosrin C, Vallee B, Benedetti H. Neurofibromin Structure, Functions and Regulation. Cells. 2020 Oct 27;9(11). pii: cells9112365. doi: 10.3390/cells9112365. PMID:33121128 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9112365
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Naschberger A, Baradaran R, Rupp B, Carroni M. The structure of neurofibromin isoform 2 reveals different functional states. Nature. 2021 Nov;599(7884):315-319. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04024-x. Epub 2021, Oct 27. PMID:34707296 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04024-x
- ↑ Trovo-Marqui AB, Tajara EH. Neurofibromin: a general outlook. Clin Genet. 2006 Jul;70(1):1-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00639.x. PMID:16813595 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00639.x
- ↑ Hall BE, Bar-Sagi D, Nassar N. The structural basis for the transition from Ras-GTP to Ras-GDP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Sep 17;99(19):12138-42. Epub 2002 Sep 4. PMID:12213964 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192453199
- ↑ Cimino PJ, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis type 1. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;148:799-811. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64076-5.00051-X. PMID:29478615 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64076-5.00051-X
- ↑ Yoshimura SH, Hirano T. HEAT repeats - versatile arrays of amphiphilic helices working in crowded environments? J Cell Sci. 2016 Nov 1;129(21):3963-3970. doi: 10.1242/jcs.185710. Epub 2016 Oct , 6. PMID:27802131 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.185710
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Lupton CJ, Bayly-Jones C, D'Andrea L, Huang C, Schittenhelm RB, Venugopal H, Whisstock JC, Halls ML, Ellisdon AM. The cryo-EM structure of the human neurofibromin dimer reveals the molecular basis for neurofibromatosis type 1. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2021 Dec;28(12):982-988. doi: 10.1038/s41594-021-00687-2., Epub 2021 Dec 9. PMID:34887559 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00687-2
- ↑ Scheffzek K, Welti S. Pleckstrin homology (PH) like domains - versatile modules in protein-protein interaction platforms. FEBS Lett. 2012 Aug 14;586(17):2662-73. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.06.006. Epub , 2012 Jun 19. PMID:22728242 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.06.006
- ↑ Dunzendorfer-Matt T, Mercado EL, Maly K, McCormick F, Scheffzek K. The neurofibromin recruitment factor Spred1 binds to the GAP related domain without affecting Ras inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7497-502. doi:, 10.1073/pnas.1607298113. Epub 2016 Jun 16. PMID:27313208 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607298113
- ↑ Frech M, Darden TA, Pedersen LG, Foley CK, Charifson PS, Anderson MW, Wittinghofer A. Role of glutamine-61 in the hydrolysis of GTP by p21H-ras: an experimental and theoretical study. Biochemistry. 1994 Mar 22;33(11):3237-44. doi: 10.1021/bi00177a014. PMID:8136358 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00177a014
- ↑ Bunda S, Burrell K, Heir P, Zeng L, Alamsahebpour A, Kano Y, Raught B, Zhang ZY, Zadeh G, Ohh M. Inhibition of SHP2-mediated dephosphorylation of Ras suppresses oncogenesis. Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 30;6:8859. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9859. PMID:26617336 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9859
- ↑ Abramowicz A, Gos M. Neurofibromin in neurofibromatosis type 1 - mutations in NF1gene as a cause of disease. Dev Period Med. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):297-306. PMID:25182393
- ↑ Cimino PJ, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis type 1. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;148:799-811. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64076-5.00051-X. PMID:29478615 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64076-5.00051-X
- ↑ Ly KI, Blakeley JO. The Diagnosis and Management of Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Med Clin North Am. 2019 Nov;103(6):1035-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.07.004. PMID:31582003 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2019.07.004
- ↑ McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Chappell WH, Abrams SL, Wong EW, Chang F, Lehmann B, Terrian DM, Milella M, Tafuri A, Stivala F, Libra M, Basecke J, Evangelisti C, Martelli AM, Franklin RA. Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Aug;1773(8):1263-84. doi:, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Oct 7. PMID:17126425 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.10.001
Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)
Jordyn K. Lenard, Ryan D. Adkins, Michal Harel, OCA, Jaime Prilusky