Journal:MicroPubl Biol:000606

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
Pseudoenzymes are a relatively new concept in biochemistry in which a catalytically dead enzyme (e.g. based on loss of catalytic amino acids) still retains a function in the cell. This (sometimes essential) function can include allosteric regulation, protein scaffolding, signaling, and other roles. Based on new structural information and previously published biochemical work (Charette and Baserga, 2010), we suggest that the ribosome assembly protein Utp25/def (Charette and Baserga, 2010; Goldfeder and Oliveira, 2010) is a pseudoenzyme. More specifically, we propose that Utp25 is the first fully validated pseudohelicase, a new class of pseudoenzyme. This is based on Utp25 being an essential protein with vestigial but non-functional helicase motifs (both loss of catalytic residues and mutation of functional motifs resulting in no discernable phenotype (Charette and Baserga, 2010)). Here, we show that the Utp25 AlphaFold predicted structure adopts, both globally and locally at functional motifs, a structure that is highly similar to that of DEAD-box RNA helicases (Figure 1) making it an essential but catalytically-dead pseudohelicase.
Pseudoenzymes are a relatively new concept in biochemistry in which a catalytically dead enzyme (e.g. based on loss of catalytic amino acids) still retains a function in the cell. This (sometimes essential) function can include allosteric regulation, protein scaffolding, signaling, and other roles. Based on new structural information and previously published biochemical work (Charette and Baserga, 2010), we suggest that the ribosome assembly protein Utp25/def (Charette and Baserga, 2010; Goldfeder and Oliveira, 2010) is a pseudoenzyme. More specifically, we propose that Utp25 is the first fully validated pseudohelicase, a new class of pseudoenzyme. This is based on Utp25 being an essential protein with vestigial but non-functional helicase motifs (both loss of catalytic residues and mutation of functional motifs resulting in no discernable phenotype (Charette and Baserga, 2010)). Here, we show that the Utp25 AlphaFold predicted structure adopts, both globally and locally at functional motifs, a structure that is highly similar to that of DEAD-box RNA helicases (Figure 1) making it an essential but catalytically-dead pseudohelicase.
-
Normally, changes in a protein sequence resulting in a gain or loss of function are constrained by selective pressures. However, when a gene duplication event occurs, one of the two gene products can continue to fulfill the original function(s). The second gene product is then under reduced selective pressures and is free to accumulate sequence changes that can result in the loss of some of the original function(s). These sequence changes, such as the loss of catalytic residues, can result in the formation of a pseudoenzyme, a protein that is catalytically inactive but homologous to a functional, catalytic enzyme family (Murphy et al., 2017). This was first seen in catalytically dead kinases - the so-called pseudokinases - where it is estimated that 10%, or 50 out of 500, human kinases are pseudokinases. Pseudoenzymes as functional but catalytically dead enzymes are in contrast to pseudogenes. Both share the property of possessing sequence changes from their ancestral counterpart. However, pseudogenes are typically non-coding such as through the loss of start codons and sequence frameshifts. Based on previous work (Charette and Baserga, 2010), we propose that a DEAD-box RNA helicase underwent a gene duplication in the last common eukaryotic ancestor. RNA helicases possess two functions - RNA binding and ATP binding/hydrolysis. Thus, we suggest that the catalytic residues responsible for ATP binding and hydrolysis were lost - hence being a pseudohelicase - while the RNA binding function was retained in what might be a case of evolutionary subfunctionalization. (It remains to be determined if Utp25’s RNA binding activity (Charette and Baserga, 2010; Goldfeder and Oliveira, 2010) is direct or mediated through an unknown RNA-binding protein). The continued cataloging of pseudoenzymes, such as this identification of pseudohelicases as a new category, will increase our understanding of pseudoenzyme function and protein evolution. As pseudoenzymes participate in signal transduction (as allosteric regulators and pseudokinases) and ribosome assembly (here as pseudohelicases), they expand our knowledge of cell mechanisms and are potential new drug targets for diseases such as cancer.
+
Normally, changes in a protein sequence resulting in a gain or loss of function are constrained by selective pressures. However, when a gene duplication event occurs, one of the two gene products can continue to fulfill the original function(s). The second gene product is then under reduced selective pressures and is free to accumulate sequence changes that can result in the loss of some of the original function(s). These sequence changes, such as the loss of catalytic residues, can result in the formation of a pseudoenzyme, a protein that is catalytically inactive but homologous to a functional, catalytic enzyme family (Murphy et al., 2017). This was first seen in catalytically dead kinases - the so-called pseudokinases - where it is estimated that 10%, or 50 out of 500, human kinases are pseudokinases. Pseudoenzymes as functional but catalytically dead enzymes are in contrast to pseudogenes. Both share the property of possessing sequence changes from their ancestral counterpart. However, pseudogenes are typically non-coding such as through the loss of start codons and sequence frameshifts. Based on previous work (Charette and Baserga, 2010), we propose that a DEAD-box RNA helicase underwent a gene duplication in the last common eukaryotic ancestor. RNA helicases possess two functions - RNA binding and ATP binding/hydrolysis. Thus, we suggest that the catalytic residues responsible for ATP binding and hydrolysis were lost - hence being a pseudohelicase - while the RNA binding function was retained in what might be a case of evolutionary subfunctionalization. (It remains to be determined if Utp25s RNA binding activity (Charette and Baserga, 2010; Goldfeder and Oliveira, 2010) is direct or mediated through an unknown RNA-binding protein). The continued cataloging of pseudoenzymes, such as this identification of pseudohelicases as a new category, will increase our understanding of pseudoenzyme function and protein evolution. As pseudoenzymes participate in signal transduction (as allosteric regulators and pseudokinases) and ribosome assembly (here as pseudohelicases), they expand our knowledge of cell mechanisms and are potential new drug targets for diseases such as cancer.
RNA helicases comprise a large family of proteins involved in nearly all aspects of RNA function, including ribosome assembly and translation. Historically, the main ascribed function of helicases is to unwind (i.e. unzip) DNA and RNA duplexes, though their function is now recognized to include the association, dissociation, or remodeling of RNA-RNA and RNA-protein complexes. The focus of our article, Utp25, was first discovered as a component of the small subunit (SSU) processome, a 6 MDa ribonucleoprotein complex responsible for most pre-rRNA processing and assembly steps of the SSU of the ribosome (Charette and Baserga, 2010; Goldfeder and Oliveira, 2010). Sequence analysis identified in Utp25 partial sequence motifs (Figure 1-Top) that are hallmarks of the DEAD-box family of RNA helicases. These conserved motifs mediate the binding of RNA and/or the binding and hydrolysis of ATP. Interestingly, Utp25 has significant sequence changes in most of these motifs. Mutational loss of the remaining conserved sequence motifs 1a and partial motif VI resulted in no change in growth (Charette and Baserga, 2010).
RNA helicases comprise a large family of proteins involved in nearly all aspects of RNA function, including ribosome assembly and translation. Historically, the main ascribed function of helicases is to unwind (i.e. unzip) DNA and RNA duplexes, though their function is now recognized to include the association, dissociation, or remodeling of RNA-RNA and RNA-protein complexes. The focus of our article, Utp25, was first discovered as a component of the small subunit (SSU) processome, a 6 MDa ribonucleoprotein complex responsible for most pre-rRNA processing and assembly steps of the SSU of the ribosome (Charette and Baserga, 2010; Goldfeder and Oliveira, 2010). Sequence analysis identified in Utp25 partial sequence motifs (Figure 1-Top) that are hallmarks of the DEAD-box family of RNA helicases. These conserved motifs mediate the binding of RNA and/or the binding and hydrolysis of ATP. Interestingly, Utp25 has significant sequence changes in most of these motifs. Mutational loss of the remaining conserved sequence motifs 1a and partial motif VI resulted in no change in growth (Charette and Baserga, 2010).

Revision as of 13:20, 29 August 2022

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Alexander Berchansky, Jaime Prilusky

This page complements a publication in scientific journals and is one of the Proteopedia's Interactive 3D Complement pages. For aditional details please see I3DC.
Personal tools