BASIL2023GVP76586

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
From the Blast results we saw that it was from the ROK family and that it was a putative kinase.
From the Blast results we saw that it was from the ROK family and that it was a putative kinase.
The next tool we used was Dali shown in table 2.(Dali figure).
The next tool we used was Dali shown in table 2.(Dali figure).
-
From the Dali results the best results we saw were from a putative kinase, glucokinase and a DNA-binding kinase. These results are what showed us that there could be a potential nucleosides though we weren't for sure which one it could be until we go to docking.
+
From the Dali results the best results we saw were from a putative kinase, glucokinase and a DNA-binding kinase. These results are what showed us that there could be potential nucleosides though we weren't for sure which one it could be until we go to docking.
-
The next tool we used was
+
The next tool we used was InterPro which can be seen in Table 3 (InterPro figure).
 +
The InterPro figure really help us narrow down that it could be either of those to substrates because again it shown a sugar kinase and a ATPase which would mean that there is potentially a nucloeside or something to with ATP.
== Molecular Docking ==
== Molecular Docking ==
From the initial search throughout all of the computational tools, we decided that our putative kinase was potentially a glucokinase. We docked other sugars along with glucose in figure 1. taking in consideration of the DNA binding domain found in the InterPro results we docked DNA nitrogenous bases and nucleosides which are show in Table 5.
From the initial search throughout all of the computational tools, we decided that our putative kinase was potentially a glucokinase. We docked other sugars along with glucose in figure 1. taking in consideration of the DNA binding domain found in the InterPro results we docked DNA nitrogenous bases and nucleosides which are show in Table 5.
Line 27: Line 28:
== Conclusions ==
== Conclusions ==
-
 
+
IN conclusion we l
-
This is a sample scene created with SAT to <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/1">color</scene> by Group, and another to make <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/2">a transparent representation</scene> of the protein. You can make your own scenes on SAT starting from scratch or loading and editing one of these sample scenes.
+
-
 
+
</StructureSection>
</StructureSection>
== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 17:39, 22 April 2023

Investigating the Function of Protein P76586

Caption for this structure

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

References

  1. Hanson, R. M., Prilusky, J., Renjian, Z., Nakane, T. and Sussman, J. L. (2013), JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia. Isr. J. Chem., 53:207-216. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300024
  2. Herraez A. Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006 Jul;34(4):255-61. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644. PMID:21638687 doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Brooklyn Mills, Hannah Myli, Bonnie Hall, Jaime Prilusky

Personal tools