BASIL2023GVP76586

This is a default text for your page BASIL2023GVP76586. Click above on edit this page to modify. Be careful with the < and > signs.

You may include any references to papers as in: the use of JSmol in Proteopedia ^[1] or to the article describing Jmol ^[2] to the rescue.

The Initial Search

We were given a Protein with a predicted structure from Uniport and an unknown function. We are trying to find the function of the protein. We did this by first using computational tools like Blast, Dali, and Interpro to help us find potential substrates. The first computational tool we used was Blast the results of which are shown below on Table 1. (blast figure). From the Blast results we saw that it was from the ROK family and that it was a putative kinase. The next tool we used was Dali shown in table 2.(Dali figure). From the Dali results the best results we saw were from a putative kinase, glucokinase and a DNA-binding kinase. These results are what showed us that there could be potential nucleosides though we weren't for sure which one it could be until we go to docking. The next tool we used was InterPro which can be seen in Table 3 (InterPro figure). The InterPro figure really help us narrow down that it could be either of those to substrates because again it shown a sugar kinase and a ATPase which would mean that there is potentially a nucloeside or something to with ATP.

Molecular Docking

From the initial search throughout all of the computational tools, we decided that our putative kinase was potentially a glucokinase. We docked other sugars along with glucose in figure 1. Taking in consideration of the DNA binding domain found in the InterPro results we docked DNA nitrogenous bases and nucleosides, the structures of the nitrogenous bases are shown in figure 2 Image:Nitrogenous bases structures.png

[table 4 results docked sugars]

[docked nucleoside structures figure 2] [table 5 results docked nucleosides-bases] From the results of the docked sugars, nitrogenous bases, and nucleosides, we determined that guanosine was a strong potential substrate but still wanted to test glucose due to the computational tools results since glucokinase was a common output in all of our searches. We used Pymol to visualize the intermolecular interactions in the active site with guanosine (figure 3) and glucose (figure 4).

Structural Highlights

with 397 amino acids. It's secondary structure is made up of alpha helices, beta sheets, and random coil. Through docking we were able to identify possible amino acids involved in the of P76586. Potential amino acids in the active site are Tyr23, Asp81, Arg183, Gln393, and Tyr389.

Results

Our protein of interest has a weight of ≈44.53kD. When analyzing SDS PAGE (figure 5) we were slightly concerned we weren't working with our protein of interest. We didn't get a great image out of SDS, if there were more time we would run again with more protein in the well so that we could see it better. We ran two coupled kinase assays, one with glucose and one with guanosine. After calculating the specific activity of our protein with glucose and guanosine we determined there was not enough activity for glucose or guanosine to be the substrate.

Conclusions

In conclusion we learned that neither glucose or guanosine were substrates. This project also made us realize just how frustrating research can be. We also hope that the research we did can help groups in the future that work with this protein. Some other things that we learned was amazing pipetting skills that we can take with us in future classes and our careers in the future.