Sandbox326
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== How Experimental Data Will Answer the Hypothesis == | == How Experimental Data Will Answer the Hypothesis == | ||
o The different computer modeling strategies used such as Chimera, SPRITE, Dali, BLAST, InterPRO, and SwissDock allowed visualization of the protein’s structure as a whole | o The different computer modeling strategies used such as Chimera, SPRITE, Dali, BLAST, InterPRO, and SwissDock allowed visualization of the protein’s structure as a whole | ||
| - | and at the | + | and at the amino acid level, showed us different alignments and active sites, compared it to other proteins for function analysis, showed different substrate interactions and much |
more which we will dive into in the experimental section. | more which we will dive into in the experimental section. | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
enzyme functioned in an area of the body at that pH). | enzyme functioned in an area of the body at that pH). | ||
| - | == ''' | + | == '''Materials & Methods''' == |
| + | |||
| + | == Computer Modeling Strategies == | ||
| + | o Chimera: allowed visualization of the protein; was used to compare conformation, identity, and conservation of amino acid side chains; was used instead of Dali (Dali didn’t analyze side chains); visualized results from SPRITE in a different way. | ||
| + | |||
| + | o SPRITE: evaluated local alignments- only a small part of the protein; identified active sites; was used to search for configurations of amino acid side chains that have a similar structure to those of known enzyme active sites. | ||
| + | |||
| + | o Dali: aligned the entire 3D protein (global alignment), matched structurally similar proteins rather than sequence similarities like BLAST. Dali is more limited than BLAST since it can only work with protein structures as a whole (there are fewer known structures than known sequences); only had matches based on the backbone of the protein, did not involve amino acid side chains or side chains that would show functionality of the enzyme. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | o BLAST: sequence searching that only matched similar amino acid sequences rather than the whole protein; Looked at the sequence in sections, found matching overlaps with sequences in the database, scored the matches based on similarity, and provided a list of matches. | ||
| + | |||
| + | o InterPro: matched similar sequences rather than the whole protein; matched the unknown protein to a family which gave clues about its function, where it is, and general information about qualities that it might share with other proteins in that family. | ||
| + | |||
| + | o SwissDock: computationally predicted how substrates would interact and bind with the active site or allosteric sites; Tested various ligands and provided binding energies. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Key Information about Chemicals, Equipment, & Instrumentation == | ||
| + | o E. Coli strain | ||
| + | |||
| + | o Buffers (Sodium Phosphate buffer, Tris-HCl, Re-Suspension Buffer, Cell Lysis Buffer, 1X Wash Buffer, 1X Elution Buffer, 10X SDS-PAGE Buffer, Coomassie Blue Stain, and Destain) were prepared by classmates with appropriate techniques and all materials were stored at necessary temperatures. | ||
| + | |||
| + | o Equipment used: computer modeling systems, Bradford Assay, PAGE, sonication, centrifuge, UV-vis, freezer (Glacier, -86°C, ULTRALOW TEMPERATURE FREEZER) | ||
| + | |||
| + | o Protein samples were kept on ice to avoid denaturing due to temperature changes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | o Glassware was cleaned, all equipment was properly prepared prior to the start of the lab, and contamination was reduced through the use of disposable cuvettes and pipette tips. | ||
| + | |||
| + | o | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Revision as of 21:25, 25 April 2024
Identification of Unknown Protein 2QRU
| |||||||||||
References
- ↑ Hanson, R. M., Prilusky, J., Renjian, Z., Nakane, T. and Sussman, J. L. (2013), JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia. Isr. J. Chem., 53:207-216. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300024
- ↑ Herraez A. Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006 Jul;34(4):255-61. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644. PMID:21638687 doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644
