1tml

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 20: Line 20:
</jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=1tml ConSurf].
</jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=1tml ConSurf].
<div style="clear:both"></div>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
 +
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;">
 +
== Publication Abstract from PubMed ==
 +
One way to improve the economic feasibility of biomass conversion is to enhance the catalytic efficiency of cellulases through protein engineering. This requires that high-resolution structures of cellulases be available. Here we present the structure of E2cd, the catalytic domain of the thermophilic endocellulase E2 from Thermomonospora fusca, as determined by X-ray crystallography. The structure was solved by multiple isomorphous replacement at 2.6-A resolution and has been refined at 1.8-A resolution to an R-value of 18.4% for all reflections between 10- and 1.8-A resolution. The fold of E2cd is based on an unusual parallel beta-barrel and is equivalent to the fold determined for the catalytic domain of cellobiohydrolase II, an exocellulase from Trichoderma reesei [Rouvinen et al. (1990) Science 249, 380-385]. The active site cleft of the enzyme, approximately 11 A deep and running the entire length of the molecule, is seen to be completely free for ligand binding in the crystal. A 2.2-A resolution analysis of crystals of E2cd complexed with cellobiose, an inhibitor, shows how cellobiose binds in the active site and interacts with several residues which line the cleft. Catalytic roles are suggested for three aspartic acid residues at the active site. A comparison of the E2cd and CBHIIcd structures reveals a large difference in their active site accessibilities and supports the hypothesis that the main difference between endo- and exocellulases is the degree to which their active sites are accessible to substrate.
 +
 +
Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of a thermophilic endocellulase.,Spezio M, Wilson DB, Karplus PA Biochemistry. 1993 Sep 28;32(38):9906-16. PMID:8399160<ref>PMID:8399160</ref>
 +
 +
From MEDLINE&reg;/PubMed&reg;, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="pdbe-citations 1tml" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div>
==See Also==
==See Also==
*[[Glucanase 3D structures|Glucanase 3D structures]]
*[[Glucanase 3D structures|Glucanase 3D structures]]
 +
== References ==
 +
<references/>
__TOC__
__TOC__
</StructureSection>
</StructureSection>

Revision as of 05:36, 5 June 2024

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE CATALYTIC DOMAIN OF A THERMOPHILIC ENDOCELLULASE

PDB ID 1tml

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

OCA

Personal tools